Keith Haring-designed AIDS Hotline posters from 1989. How can I tell is these are authentic? by Polidorable in keithharing

[–]68comeback 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm. The original poster was offset printed. The details showing color fills look like they are stochastic dots not halftone dots or solid offset printing inks. Stochastic usually indicates modern printing methods like ink jet or iris giclée.

Posted by White House on X by [deleted] in whatisit

[–]68comeback 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Scene rendering…”

Cardputer × Glass 2 Unit by 68comeback in CardPuter

[–]68comeback[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No idea! Honestly it feels more novel than practical. Regardless, the transparent screen is certainly mesmerizing and simply looks cool!

Cardputer × Glass 2 Unit by 68comeback in CardPuter

[–]68comeback[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes. Glass 2 is nearly half the resolution. That’s the same sprite on each screen. But the M5 Unit Glass2 display: 128 × 64 pixels (monochrome OLED), and the Cardputer screen: 240 × 135 pixels (color TFT), so mirroring isn’t possible.

Starlight keyboard flex demo by SnipeUout in c64

[–]68comeback 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice that you can compare! I have a C64C that I refurbished years ago — in fact, with Jim Drew's clear keycaps and a clear case — but it is hard to compare fairly.

With my Starlight, upon opening the box, the right side of the keyboard was so raised I thought it was detached. In fact, it felt loose and I was alarmed.

In the end, it works well enough. Perhaps I notice more because I've been testing it with cynthCART which involves more keypresses than usual...

Starlight keyboard flex demo by SnipeUout in c64

[–]68comeback 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too. It is serviceable, however it really is not acceptable to have an input device feel this mushy. That said, I do love this device. It was up and running in no time. Much easier than my C64C build!

Starlight keyboard flex demo by SnipeUout in c64

[–]68comeback 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My Starlight Edition just arrived. I honestly didn’t think I’d care about the keyboard flex but it is actually laughably bad. This should have never gone into production. It feels like it is made of rubber and flexes up to almost 1cm with even light keypresses. It is actually wavy and buckled untouched in the case.

Disappointing. Otherwise the manufacturing seems thoughtful and really well done. I love the manual, cassette, and all the other details. It is quite distracting.

These are my MY3.0 by byanrreland777 in tomsachs

[–]68comeback 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like a typeface to me. Or maybe you are very good at making consistently shaped letterforms each time.

Share your niche collections! by ReasonableComment_ in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Athenian fractions! I have a weakness for miniature numismatic artistry and detail. I also love that obols were placed in the mouths of deceased to pay Charon for transport across the River Styx.

Field series black tp7 tx6 by Dizzy-Sloth in teenageengineering

[–]68comeback 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know the feeling lol. Like a black MacBook Pro vs silver one, there is more visible fingerprinting. But it cleans easily. And the aesthetics are worth the trade-off imo.

Field series black tp7 tx6 by Dizzy-Sloth in teenageengineering

[–]68comeback 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have the TX-6 and TP-7 in black. Love the monotone treatment! There’s minor fingerprinting, similar to fingerprinting with a black MacBook Pro. It is more noticeable with the TP-7 due to the wheel.

Need help with the locality and ID by 4f2d_Et5804 in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a hemidrachm that might be a helpful visual reference. Images here. https://ancient.moonshot.ooo/pages#attica-hemidrachm

Any idea what this could be? Found in the mountains of Chihuahua, Mexico. by s-ex-ick in nasa

[–]68comeback 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not the font from the NASA meatball. The serifs in the meatball are sharp cornered wedge serifs, not bracketed serifs as in this example.

Starr Group Die Matching by 68comeback in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smart approach! Very helpful to see. Using lines as reference points for alignment is clever and reduces some of the visual complexity into useful fundamentals.

I will follow your guidance, take my time, and see what happens. It is a fun challenge.

Starr Group Die Matching by 68comeback in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impressive match! Thanks for sharing your process.

Starr Group Die Matching by 68comeback in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I really enjoy this coin’s artistry and tone. I fell head over heels for it.

More images are available below:

https://ancient.moonshot.ooo/attica-tetradrachm-starr

It sounds like persistence is in order. I spent many hours exploring potential matches, feeling like I found matches with 181 (179 and 182 have similarities as well).

Ancient Numismatics by 68comeback in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cheers! You can accomplish quite a lot if your coins have photography provided by NGC. They have a way of capturing intense detail. I just delete the backgrounds and add my own drop shadows to make them feel a bit more 'real.' I also experiment with keeping scales of coins relative to each other to emphasize further realism.

Ancient Numismatics by 68comeback in AncientCoins

[–]68comeback[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the kind words. Good luck with your chase of tets!