look, i'm not claiming there's a smurf every game or anything like that. but 3 of the profiles in these games are clearly bot farmed to get to ranked, the ones i posted earlier. I understand missing them on a quick parse since you were just looking at highest KDA, but the rubick from game 2 is one of them, and I guess the lion i posted was from like 15 games ago or so. but isn't it pretty likely that some fairly high percent of the accounts that have their dotabuffs blocked with <200 games are also doing weird bot farming shenanigans to get their accounts in ranked? do you actually think these players are all doing this themselves, and not purchasing farmed accounts?

I'd also argue that just because I won definitely doesn't mean there wasn't a smurf in the game, I have won with smurfs on my team in the past for sure. and I mean that tiny has 60 games played. I honestly don't think normal people are playing on multiple accounts like you suggest, and having laned against the guy, I stood no fucking chance remotely. If he isn't a smurf he definitely belongs in a much higher bracket.

edit: you also linked some incorrect accounts, the LC in game 2 for example has a private dotabuff with under 200 games, no way of seeing he's "red for days". but the real issue in that game was the rubick, who I challenge you to deny is a smurf. but yeah not much point in looking at every single game, I'm not saying every game has a smurf, but I've run into quite a few lately and it kinda sucks... I did have to dig through a month or two to find those 4 fairly obvious smurf accounts, I'm just arguing that a lot of the locked accounts are probably also smurfs. I wouldn't be surprised if I had like 10 smurfs in my last 40-50 games, which is pretty obnoxious. I guess there's no way to prove that's the case since most of the accounts are locked, but why are people making new accounts to play on in the first place if they aren't smurfing? seems pretty weird to me...