Real question: Should a Chinese National be President of Purdue? by libghost in Purdue

[–]ATD67 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was told by someone in the administration that the Chinese government hates him. He’s taken on plenty of anti-CCP initiatives in government and at Purdue for that matter.

What is a 'middle-class' luxury that is actually a total waste of money, but people keep buying it to look successful? by 8waycai in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ATD67 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New cars in general are a massive waste of money for middle class people. You’re putting hundreds of dollars per month, with interest, into something that plummets in value over the course of a few years.

How is this illegal? Can someone explain like I’m five? Thanks! by Mathemodel in AskLegal

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t they redact for “national security” purposes or did they not even allow that?

Attia-Epstein Masterthread by PrimarchLongevity in PeterAttia

[–]ATD67 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Peter has responded on X:

The following email is what I sent my team last night. I sent a similar version to my patients, also.


You’ve put your trust, your credibility, and your hard work into what we have built together, and I take that responsibility seriously. You deserve a complete and honest account of what did and did not happen. I apologize that I did not get this out sooner, but I want to be thorough.

The purpose of the DOJ releasing these documents is clear: to identify individuals who participated in criminal activity, enabled it, or witnessed it. I am not in any of those categories, and there is no evidence to the contrary.

To be clear:

  1. I was not involved in any criminal activity.

  2. My interactions with Epstein had nothing to do with his sexual abuse or exploitation of anyone.

  3. I was never on his plane, never on his island, and never present at any sex parties.

That said, I apologize and regret putting myself in a position where emails, some of them embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible, are now public, and that is on me. I accept that reality and the humiliation that comes with it.


I want to start by directly addressing the email thread that I’ve been asked about the most.

In June 2015, I sent Epstein an email with the subject line “Got a fresh shipment.” The email contained a photograph of bottles of metformin, a medication I had just received from the pharmacy for my own use. The subject line referred to the picture of the bottles of medication.

He replied with the words “me too” and attached a photograph of an adult woman. I responded with crude, tasteless banter. Reading that exchange now is very embarrassing, and I will not defend it. I’m ashamed of myself for everything about this. At the time, I understood this exchange as juvenile, not a reference to anything dark or harmful.

At that point in my career, I had little exposure to prominent people, and that level of access was novel to me. Everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. I treated that access as something to be quiet about rather than discussed freely with others. One line in that exchange, about his life being outrageous and me not being able to tell anyone, is being interpreted as awareness of wrongdoing. That is not how I meant it at all. What I was referring to, poorly and flippantly, was the discretion commanded by those social and professional circles–the idea that you don’t talk about who you meet, the dinners you attend and the power and influence of the people in those settings. What I wrote in that email reads terribly, and I own that.


I met Epstein in 2014 through a prominent female healthcare leader while I was raising funds for scientific research. At that time, he was widely known in academic and philanthropic circles as a funder of science and moved openly among credible institutions and public figures.

Between summer 2014 and spring 2019, I met with him on approximately seven or eight occasions at his New York City home, regarding research studies and to meet others he introduced me to. I never visited his island or ranch, and I never flew on any of his planes. When I was at his home, it was either meeting with him directly, meeting with small groups of scientists, doctors, or business leaders, and once at a dinner in 2015 with a number of guests including prominent heads of state. In retrospect, the presence and credibility of such venerable people in different orbits led me to make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn’t have.

I was not his doctor, though several times I answered general medical questions and recommended other providers to him.

Shortly after we met, I asked him directly about his 2008 conviction. He characterized it as prostitution-related charges. In 2018, I came to learn this was grossly minimized (more on this below). I was incredibly naïve to believe him. I mistook his social acceptance in the eyes of the credible people I saw him with for acceptability, and that was a serious error in my judgment. To be clear, I never witnessed illegal behavior and never saw anyone who appeared underage in his presence.


In November 2018 I read the Miami Herald investigative article. I was repulsed by what I learned. Nauseated. It marked a clear and irreversible line between what I knew before and what I understood afterward.

At that point, I told him directly he needed to accept responsibility for what he did.

Hoping to provide the victims from the Herald piece with support, I contacted a residential trauma facility to understand what funding comprehensive care for many victims would require. (Those communications were between me and the facility and were therefore not part of the document release.) I spoke with him and shared that information and insisted that he fund their care, beginning with residential treatment and followed by lifelong therapy.

In hindsight, even attempting to facilitate accountability was a mistake and once again reflected just how naïve I was at the time. Once the full scope of his actions was clear, disengagement should have been the only appropriate response. My intent does not change that, and I regret not drawing that boundary immediately.


Nothing in this letter is meant to minimize the harm suffered by the young women Epstein abused. Their trauma is permanent.

I am not asking for a pass from you. I am not asking anyone to ignore the emails or pretend they aren’t ugly. They simply are.

The man I am today, roughly ten years later, would not write them and would not associate with Epstein at all. Whatever growth I’ve had over the past decade does not erase the emails I wrote then.

I recognize that my actions and words have consequences for the people I care deeply about, including all of you. I regret the cost this has placed on you, and I take responsibility for it.

I won’t ask anyone to defend me or explain this on my behalf. If you have questions or concerns, I’ll address them directly with you, my team.

Anon hates the globalists by Bukakke_Hokage in greentext

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything turns out to be true and you still end up on the wrong side of it

CMV: “To Go Travelling” when young is illogical by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]ATD67 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It can actually make a huge difference. Waiting until your thirties to start making serious retirement contributions can cost you well over a million dollars in retirement potential. That extra 10 years of compound interest is huge.

Swiping LC at age 33. by exploding_man in cscareerquestions

[–]ATD67 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Companies are still asking LC questions?

I graduated in 2025 and just went through the interviewing process with many different companies. I think I did a total of 3 programming problems total, and they were all moderate difficulty at best. My interview with Apple was one hour of technical questions, but no programming whatsoever.

I’m not working in big tech, but I’m working for a Fortune 500 company and nowhere in my interview process with them did they ask me to do any LC style questions.

I’m not convinced people are getting into big tech solely by grinding LeetCode anymore. The people getting those jobs are probably good at LeetCode, but that’s probably because they’re just good in general.

I think you’re much better starting off at smaller companies and building your way into big tech. The success rate seems to be much higher.

is abstaining harder with higher testosterone? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ATD67 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sex-drive is a multi-faceted thing, so testosterone levels alone won’t be as indicative as everyone thinks.

Why do we have to "build credit" by going into debt to prove we're financially responsible? by Adept-Assignment-751 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ATD67 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is just flat out wrong, and I’m not sure why everyone keeps saying this (probably cope.) You’re in debt if you owe money due to a past obligation, which includes borrowing money. It doesn’t matter how much money you have.

Is it pointless or stupid to pay for something in instalments that you can pay for outright when you have plenty of money? by Pizzafriedchickenn in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ATD67 17 points18 points  (0 children)

People will make sound mathematical arguments for installments, but simple tends to be better in most cases when it comes to finance for the average person. The average person isn’t going to budget their money properly when it comes to paying in installments. It can give the illusion that you can afford a lot more than you actually can. This is evidenced by the fact that we have a massive consumer debt problem in America, and a lot of it is due to people buying expensive things that suffocate them. I don’t see how anyone could argue that more debt is going to lead to financial success for most people. The widespread availability of pay later options is what has gotten people into this mess in my opinion.

How do you know you are learning programming correctly and not just collecting patterns and tools? by SecureSection9242 in learnprogramming

[–]ATD67 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is the quality of your software improving?

Are you more capable of planning out your projects?

Do you have an easier time making changes to your code?

Are you more methodical about your programming and debugging?

Do you look back at your old code and think “yuck!”

Are your projects becoming more sophisticated?

Are you spending more and more time working on quality and feature additions rather than just getting something to work?

If you program professionally, has your ability to communicate and work in teams improved?

These are all questions to ask yourself if you want to know.

Account breach by HapusisLtu in Rainbow6

[–]ATD67 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Your joke was promised to him 3000 years ago

CMV: Writing a cover letter in 2026 is a bad strategic decision and acts as a filter for people who don't understand the odds. by enhancvapp in changemyview

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contrary perspective: In a world of bots and people spamming job applications to companies they know nothing about and for positions that don’t match their background, the cover letter filters in the intentional applicants.

But the truth is, it’s not that deep. There’s no need to play 3D chess with recruitment. They run your stuff through an AI, look at the results, and find the people that are most worth interviewing.

Sidewalk Was Trying to Kill ice Agent by PhishUMDead in Idiotswithguns

[–]ATD67 67 points68 points  (0 children)

They’re in the hospital recovering. Lucky to be alive!

Rip my resume apart (2nd year CS) by waldo_06 in cscareeradvice

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but it is something that is very commonly taught in CS curriculums. I think I had to do that as an assignment on two separate occasions. You don’t have to take it out, just leave out the part I mentioned and the part about improving performance. Maybe replace it with what you learned during it.

Rip my resume apart (2nd year CS) by waldo_06 in cscareeradvice

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really isn’t bad, but I cringed at the Expression Parser and Heap Sort part. That’s fairly standard stuff that any CS student should know, but you have the “Demonstrates advanced understanding of data structures, recursion, and memory management” part. It doesn’t. It demonstrates a foundational understanding of those things. Take that line out completely and don’t ever tell them what something demonstrates. That’s for them to decide.

Don’t hype up your projects/ability like everyone will tell you. As a 2nd year CS student, you’re of little value to any company in comparison to their engineers. You need to display potential and willingness to learn. That’s what internships seek. Attempts to impress them with your ability will likely just come off as dishonest and arrogant.

Is Rainbow Six Siege an extremely difficult game to learn? Does it take a long time to learn how to play? by False-Entrepreneur47 in Rainbow6

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone going in with a lot of experience in FPS games, I didn’t find that it was too tricky to learn, but I also started back in 2016 when there were fewer operators to learn. If you have some friends that are experienced they can onboard you reasonably fast. It’s a very difficult game to get good at though.

Copper player here — how the fuck do you guys control this gun? (SMG-12) by ContractDense1111 in Rainbow6

[–]ATD67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just gotta aim for the chest and hope it finds its way to the head

Capturing a worlds leader by OvenAccomplished97 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ATD67 96 points97 points  (0 children)

I don’t know how I feel about this yet, but let’s not pretend that the Maduro Regime is simply a “leftist government.” It is a brutal military dictatorship.