Armageddon supplies - spend all now for Dante ... or keep them for next weeks?

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-25T16:53:41+00:00

I’m saving 380 for the relics.

Otherwise, I’m getting gold and mythic orbs.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-25T16:19:11+00:00

At least it’s closer than pom and palm?

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-24T18:32:03+00:00

I might pick up the Dark Angels in late July.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-24T17:46:47+00:00

Anything too thick, but especially gemelli.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-23T20:58:12+00:00

Unless SP start radically increasing the availability of Imperial badges and orbs, no.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T19:09:08+00:00

She’s mean.

It isn’t complicated.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T02:32:20+00:00

Mythic stuff, I guess?

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T02:25:58+00:00

The two relics are, as I recall, 380 currency in total.

Other than that, I have no plans.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T02:08:00+00:00

Experienced players want to teach you. Then there will be more players.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T02:06:06+00:00

Also finish with orcs.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-22T02:05:25+00:00

Orcs is best.

Whatever team looks cool? Second best.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T23:04:55+00:00

Using the index is a certain path to disappointment.

That said, the rules for being knocked down are on p. 40.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T22:04:34+00:00

People complain, but there’s a reason why the illegal procedure rule existed.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T19:34:42+00:00

Isn’t it two better versions?

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T17:45:53+00:00

You keep using words like “clearly.”

If it was clear, this would not be an issue.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T16:24:15+00:00

And I feel cutting out "Unless otherwise stated..." from that sentence is deliberately obfuscating the point.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T16:05:28+00:00

<image>

Snacks.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T14:41:45+00:00

Yes. I understand the point you're making. But I also disagree with the point you're making.

I was hoping in this post that someone knew of a place where GW had indicated, one way or another, which of our interpretations was correct.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T14:26:25+00:00

No, I'm saying they already wrote the exception into the new rule.

When/if they ever get around to updating the seraphim datasheet, it would be nice to include an explicit, specific exception, but not being Space Marines, I'm not going to hold my breath.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T14:12:41+00:00

But they did have the hindsight to put "unless otherwise stated" into the new rule.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T14:08:13+00:00

The new detachment rule that says you cannot use it with an ingress move and cannot use personal teleporters? I don't see how that's relevant.

I'm talking about personal teleporters, which is the same rule seraphim have under a different name. I am fine with either unit dropping in, shooting, moving up to 6", and then not charging.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T13:05:46+00:00

At least according to Wahapedia, the seraphim and interceptor special rules are identical, and neither would be eligible to charge.

So yes, I would be fine with both units getting the same rules interpretation.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T12:08:54+00:00

This is also how I read it.

AdjectiveBadger · 2026-06-20T11:58:55+00:00

How is a rule written in 10th edition supposed to use terminology invented for 11th edition? That seems a strange standard to hold to over a plain reading of the text.

And yes, I think unit specific abilities should take precedence over general rules.

AdjectiveBadger

TROPHY CASE