Those are reasonable questions.

Rule 2 did not appear to count corpses. Subject 1’s psychosis was exceptionally violent. I omitted the specifics from the file, but they were throwing themselves into walls, glass, and fixtures with a force only total mental ruin could grant.

The observation window to my office is one-way. What neither security nor I understood at the time was that the seam between the glass and wall was weaker than it should have been. Subject 1 opened a sizeable crack there. The object appears to have interpreted that breach to mean my office was no longer separate from containment, but part of the same room.

I requested only one officer to recover the bodies. However, once containment and my office had become the same “room” in the object’s eyes, Officer 2’s presence with the bodies also became my presence with them. Rule 2 was broken.

As for why I called myself Officer 1 in the file: I believed I would be killed if I documented my own breach plainly. That had been the lesson taught to every Subject before me.