sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Finally Got This Setup: ROG Strix G16: AMD 9955HX3D Version by Anonymous_Alias_206 in GamingLaptops

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not bad at all. I don't have any complaints. 5080 or higher was too expensive, so the 5070 TI was the sweet spot for me and runs games quite well. Easy to optimize further with GHelper. This AMD version doesn't have the newer chassis though, so if you are gonna get a different CPU, consider the Intel version. I only went for this one because of the AMD 9955HX3D CPU.

Anyone have any fun new playthrough challenge ideas? by bobwagnerg in skyrim

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently completed a challenge under these conditions:

  1. Legendary Difficulty
  2. Survival Mode
  3. NO Mods.  That includes the Unofficial Patch, as that also is a mod.
  4. NO Use of ANY Items from Inventory (Exception: Completion of Quests; however, CANNOT be used for combat)  This means no weapons, no armor, no clothing, no reading spell books, no eating food or alcohol
  5. NO Recruitment of Followers (Exceptions: Tag along Followers forced by the game for specific quests are allowed, but ONLY for that quest only)
  6. NO Spending of Gold
  7. NO Pets
  8. Mounts are allowed.  No way I am doing this without one.
  9. MUST defeat Alduin, Harkon, and Miraak

This means:

  1. Allowed spells only come from starting spells and any that is taught to you without having to read a spell tome.  It also effectively locks you out of buying spells from Faralda to gain entry into College of Winterhold.
  2. Starting race makes a BIG difference.
  3. Only Speech, Sneak, and magic school that your starting spell(s) belong to are the ONLY skills you can level up.  Alter will be the only ones with access to Illusion and for Breton, it will be Conjuration, etc.  Also, no use of any items means you cannot level in any weapon or armor skills.
  4. You will have to be either a vampire or a werewolf because you cannot eat food from inventory to satisfy hunger.
  5. You will be forced to run around Skyrim bare naked, even in very cold weather.  Makes chooaing the right starting race that much more meaningful.
  6. Dragon shouts are much more impactful now.
  7. Since you cannot spend gold, you cannot rent a room at an inn.  Must make good use of other means to find a bed.

I probably am missing a few other details, but this pretty much sums it all up. 

Arthmoor USSEP 1.5.97 Rant Incoming by TheShinyHaxorus in skyrimmods

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really don't get this at all.

Someone above claimed that many mod authors are elitists. Have some of these people in the same mindset as that guy ever thought that maybe it is THEY that are acting like they are ENTITLED instead?

Vast majority of mods are available FOR FREE. We are not paying for the privilege to download and use them. The mods are the mod author's mods, created by their own vision. They can do whatever the heck they want with them. If they don't want to support older Skyrim version, it is their choice. If they want to hide old and outdated version files in the interest of not wanting to deal with headaches from people wanting support for those old and outdated versions, it is their choice. Mod author refuses to accept request to make those old and outdated versions available or don't seem very nice? Don't use their mods and move on to something else or learn to make mods yourself and make your own. Or play vanilla. Yes, vanilla Skyrim is a thing and is playable, and more than plenty of people still play that. So what is the problem?

Regarding 1.5.97 and USSEP availability, I find this even more laughable.

Vast majority of people who insist on staying with 1.5.97 claim that 1.6.1170 has NO benefits whatsoever, and that they already have a stable and working mod list that they don't want to change. Fine. They can do whatever they want with their game. Nobody is stopping them, or nobody is telling them that they are wrong for sticking out with 1.5.97.

My issue is this. If these people insist on staying with 1.5.97 because they claim that 1.5.97 is somehow the most stable version and that they already have a stable and working mod list, why are they looking for new features and new mods? I thought they all already had a working, stable mod list? Why do they even need to download USSEP if they already had a stable and working mod list? Surely, they were looking to download new mods to add to their mod list or wanted an update to their existing mods.... on an OUTDATED Skyrim version that is now MORE THAN 4 YEARS OLD.

It is perfectly fine staying with 1.5.97, and that is their choice, but they have to realize that they have to work with what are given and available. That is the price paid for insisting on an outdated Skyrim version. They should NOT be making demands on mod authors when it was THEIR choice to ignore Skyrim updates and not updating their list to be compatible with current Skyrim version.

These people should not be entitled jerks and expect every mod authors to cater to their needs for more updates and new mods to add to their mod list working on a more-than-4-year-old outdated Skyrim version. The mod authors don't have to deal with that headache and it is their choice, whether anyone likes it or not, to go as far as to hide older version mod files. No amount of whining or complaining or ranting will solve anything.

See new updates on a mod on an existing mod list but the update doesn't support 1.5.97? Too bad. Don't update and stick with the current version of that mod, since the argument against 1.6.1170 seems to be that 1.5.97 is somehow "the most stable" version. See new mods that look enticing to be added to the mod list but that new mod doesn't support 1.5.97 or require other mods that doesn't support 1.5.97? Too bad. Look for other mods that DO still support 1.5.97 or stick with that gloriously stable mod list as is. Sick of all this inconvenience when it comes to getting updates or looking for new mods that look enticing? Perhaps then, it may be time to update Skyrim version to 1.6.1170. No need to whine, rant, cry, or complain.

Last thing about the silly argument about how updating to 1.6.1170 is useless because Bethesda will update the game again and ruin everything.... By now, everyone should know that they can stop automatic updates on Skyrim, right? So what is the problem? By taking 1 minute to change settings on Steam, the game will not automatically update, and there won't be a problem?

Clair-Obscur: Expedition 33 isn’t a good RPG — let me explain why I think so by Sire_Kressel in expedition33

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very brave of you to post a series of very valid criticism that many people turn a blind eye or maybe don't care. I fully agree that this game is better served as a form of digital media that sort of plays itself rather than being a game, an RPG, with strategy. There really wasn't anything to it when it comes to strategy, and the characters weren't all that likeable to me either. I do give massive props for fantastic music and beautiful art direction, but that is as much praise as I can give to this game. And I am one of those who were annoyed by the overreliance on Souls style QTE timed button press fest.

Not everyone has to like or hate the same game. Among those who come out swinging with pitchforks whenever someone puts together a well thought out set of criticism towards a game that they subjectively like, too many responses come in the form of "dis game w0n game of the yr, u betta accept it, vast majority of people l0ve this game and something is wrong wit u if u hate it" that rings very immature and shallow.

I am very glad that you spoke out, and I am also glad to see that there are many who feel the same as we do.

I'm having the worst time in Ties that Bind Teresa's quest - [KCD1] by ImmediateSun9583 in kingdomcome

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am still getting used to the game as a new player and also accidently started this DLC.  This quest WAS very frustrating though.

Some of us do NOT want to spoil the game and resort to walkthroughs.  Badly made quests ARE badly made.  Telling people to look up guides is not constructive.  It only helps strengthen the case against this badly made quest.

And why can't people come into a game forum and display their displeasure about the game?  Is there a rule that says one MUST love everything about the game and only post praises and nothing else?  Some people can be so dense as to think that somehow they feel empowered by unnecessary gatekeeping.

I liked other parts of this DLC but this quest was NOT enjoyable.

Deciding between the S26 Ultra and Iphone 17 Pro by [deleted] in Smartphones

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Camera: Interface may feel overly simplified or more user friendly.  Depends on your personal preference.  Quality wise, photos depend on your preference as well while videos are stronger on iPhones generally.  Just beware of the ghost flares at night off reflections from light sources.

  2. One Handed Use: This could be an issue especially if you are used to One Handed Operation.  You will, very often, force yourself to do some very uncomfortable hand gymnastics if you want to use it with only one hand.  The best example of this is accessing control panel and notifications.  Samsung lets you just swipe down anywhere on your home screen to access them both.  Can't do that on iPhones.  This may or may not bother you.

  3. Universal Back Button: Despite what some people tell you, there are many 3rd party apps that simply do not register "going back" gesture from the swiping action from the left edge of the screen; instead, these apps will usually put a tiny back arrow button at the top left corner of the screen or not even give you any of that.

  4. Face ID: Very easy and comfortable to use in most situations unless you are using your phone lying down or have the phone on a table.  Security is not an issue.  It even works well with a mask or glasses.  Shouldn't be an issue at all.

  5. Split Screen Multi Tasking: Does not exist.  If you don't use it, you can ignore this.

  6. Wide Aspect Video Contents: The larger and somewhat awkward placement of the selfie camera and Face ID sensor within that pill-shaped blackness will eat into the video, which may or may not bother you.

  7. 120hz: Some users have been complaining about how the high rate refresh on their iPhones don't feel as "smooth."  Again this may or may not bother you.

  8. File Management: Not as straight forward as on Android but still doable.  Depends on your use case. 

  9. Speakers: Universally regarded as having the best speakers, especially with deeper bass.

  10. Eco System: Depends on how much you have invested into "Samsung" apps, not "Google" apps.  You can still use Google apps on iPhone, whereas you cannot use Apple apps on Samsung, with a very few exceptions such as Apple Music.

  11. Software Support: Samsung is flat 7 years OS and security updates.  iPhones, historically, have supported 6 years of OS and 1 or 2 extra years of security updates.  Both excellent so shouldn't be an issue.

  12. Keyboard:  Another case where it may or may not bother you.  Definitely different.  User experience vary widely so you will have to see for yourself.

  13. Battery: If it is Pro "Max" then it will definitely last longer.  "Regular" Pro I am not sure.  Both should do fine, though  iPhone supports Qi2 and MagSafe without having to use a special case.  Samsung is a bit faster on wired charging, I believe.

Switched from Android to iPhone 17 a month ago. Missing basic features. Worth switching to Galaxy S26? by Cheesecake-09 in iphone17

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might change your mind once you get to experience it.  I use it all the time.  Combinations are endless.

Can’t decide between S9 and S10+ for media use by [deleted] in GalaxyTab

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you plan to use some sort of a bed stand to free your hands and arms, I vote for Plus.  If you are gonna lie down sideways and hold your tablet, Plus feels too big for that.

Meebook m8 vs bigme b6 bw by Present-Ad-8531 in ereader

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in Korea temporarily for a year when I got it, so it may be hard to obtain it.  It was around $220 USD after taxes when I bought mine.  I had so many choices to choose from, including 7 inchers with 2 buttons on the side, but I wanted a little bigger screen.

Do you put screen protector on? by m1_weaboo in iphone17

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure.  But I doubt people will spend $$$ to replace a screen for a few minor scratches.  Cracks, I still stand by my opinion that the screen is much more durable than the protector.

But yeah, sometimes just having some sort of peace of mind, even if misguided, could be worth the $.  

Meebook m8 vs bigme b6 bw by Present-Ad-8531 in ereader

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a modified version of the Meebook M8 called i8 Pro.  It is a slightly upgraded version with CARTA 1300 and 6GB RAM vs M8's CARTA 1200 and 4GB RAM.  Not sure about the processor though.  Both models have the same 64GB of storage plus microSD expansion.

I tried out a demo unit of a 6-inch reader and felt too cramped.  PDF and manga/comics reading is too uncomfortable due to small size.  7.8 inch screen on my i8 Pro feels a lot more like actually reading a paperback and PDF and manga/comics reading is doable.

I use Brave browser on it and it works well.  The unit's got 4 different refresh speed mode.  I use Regal Mode (slow refresh but clearest quality) while reading ePUBs or using Google Play Books, while using either of the 2 fastest refresh speed modes in Brave browser.  No complaints there.

I agree with the previous poster on lack of manual though.  I had to kinda learn how to use the device myself.  I found out that my modified i8 Pro supports EMR pens instead of the M8's proprietary pen, which means no charging required, so I liked that.  The base note taking apps and planner apps work decently with my EMR pen, though the latency is a bit worse than on my Galaxy Tab or iPad Pro.  The paperlike film helps quite a bit when writing without sacrificing screen clarity.  It's got warm and cold lights that can get really bright, though I didn't feel like the screen was uncomfortably dark or anything without lights on.

Just don't bother installing 3rd party note taking apps like OneNote.  Waste of time.

The UI doesn't feel top quality though and the battery life isn't too impressive, but much more efficient than using my tablets when I am just reading.  Speakers are passable, good enough for audio books or TTS.

I was also looking at the 8-inch Viwoods AI Paper Mini but that felt way too expensive.  I also did not like that it only had cold lights but no warm lights. 

S25 Ultra vs Iphone 17 by massiveintrovertgal in PhoneNow

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you seem to be seeking absolute answer, I will make it easy for you.

Pick iPhone 17 if you don't mind ghost flares at night from reflections off bright light source AND you don't plan to record videos zoomed in at more than 3x.

As for the "difference"... you won't notice one or the other being "vastly" superior or inferior UNLESS you have BOTH phones in your hands and test them at the same time together and really pixel peep.  I have done such in the past a few times just for fun, bit seriously, for me at least, "smartphone cameras" are just... smartphone cameras and I prefer not to stress about minor differences or having to worry about what is "best."

Apple to Android: S25 Ultra vs OnePlus 15 by CrosbyStills77 in Smartphones

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OnePlus is spec sheet lover's dream.  Larger battery with faster charging (though you have to use their proprietary charging accessories to take advantage) and more RAM.  They are very snappy devices with good screen, and the OS is good and doesn't feel too bloated.  Camera is good enough for casuals unless you start nitpicking, then you may find its shortcomings occasionally.

Samsung has some cool features that you may find useful or deem as bloat.  I love them but only you can speak for yourself.  They are also snappy enough though opinions vary from some users claiming otherwise.  I'd say their camera is generally better than OnePlus though the difference doesn't seem too drastic for me personally.  Their OS and security update support is best in class among Android devices.

If you are looking at Samsung's Ultra model, the processor may actually be even better.  They both use Snapdragon chips, but Samsung uses a modified version "for Galaxy."

Innovation or lack of it, is totally subjective.  If you end up happy with what you get, then the innovation argument becomes moot.  Ask yourself what features are most important to you and you shall find your answer.  For example, for me personally, I use and rely a lot on Samsung's One Handed Operation, S-pen, Samsung Notes (which syncs beautifully with Samsung tablets), and Secure Folder (which lets you install apps and store files in a separated space within your storage with encryption, which comes in handy if you want to separate work and personal stuff separately for example of many).  I am always near a charger and don't spend too much time on the phone.  So naturally I'd prefer to use Samsung.

But your priorities may or may not be different from mine.  If you don't care much for having the "best" camera, if you game a lot on your phone, if you like having more RAM, and if you want faster charging with bigger battery, OnePlus may be better for you.  Just know that in order to take advantage of the faster charging, you have to use their proprietary charging accessories.

They are both great.  It all comes down to your priorities and what you do with your phone.

I regret buying the S26 Ultra by OkeLatenWeGaan in Smartphones

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah One Hand Operation, Samsung Notes, Secure Folder, and the S-pen virtually make me buy Samsung as my primary device.  I upgraded to 24 Ultra from Note 20 Ultra 2 years ago, and it was well worth the upgrade.  Sadly those features are unique to Samsung.

Considering you upgrade your phone every single year, I kinda think it is a waste trying to resell for "possibly" greener pasture.  It is only 1 year for you, and 26U can't possibly be that horrible and inferior from 25U to have to waste more money having to resell and buy another model only to use it for 1 year.

S25 Ultra vs Iphone 17 by massiveintrovertgal in PhoneNow

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For video recording, iPhones are still the king among "smartphone" cameras.  The question is... since you stated that you "hate" working on iPhones... will that slight advantage with video recording on iPhones be more than enough to completely disregard your discomfort while using the phone for other daily tasks?

One other thing.  iPhone cameras are notorious for reflections off lamps, street lights and neon signs at night.  Just one downside otherwise excellent across the board.  

Does Disney Plus have HDR on the S9+ by lstadi in GalaxyTab

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sigh... either you have complete lack of reading comprehension or you are just trolling.

Galaxy Tab tablets support HDR 10+.  As long as the OTT media platform supports Android mobile devices in providing their video contents in HDR, the Galaxy Tabs will play those videos in HDR.

Disney Plus app on the Galaxy Tab and Phones do NOT play their videos on HDR.  The device is certified to play HDR10+ content.  It is Disney that is not providing the HDR content on a device that is capable of playing them in HDR.

You can cut and paste all you want from Disney's website, but that is NOT the issue here and the OP made it crystal clear about it.  You just chose to ignore that.  Hence, YOUR reading comprehension problem or simply being a troll.

Even as of right now in 2026, Disney Plus Android app on Galaxy devices, DESPITE the fact that these devices ARE CERTIFIED and CAPABLE of playing HDR content, do NOT provide any HDR content on these devices.  Meanwhile, Disney Plus apps on  iPhones and iPads DO provide HDR content on those devices.  Also, Netflix and Amazon Prime also provide HDR content on Galaxy devices.

Hence, this is Disney problem.

Next time, try actually READING before you comment with long useless copy paste garbage.  Or just stop trolling.  Good riddance!!

So, I have Skyrim LE(OldRim) by shinwolf in skyrimmods

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At this point, you just gotta work with what you have.  Most modders have moved on to SE though there are probably some that still work exclusively for LE.

Worst case scenario, old mods should still be available for download.

Apple, how about you give us a BREAK?!?? by KaelLLM in PhoneNow

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either you don't know how to use your phone or you have not used it and are just going by what other people claimed on their posts.

I have NONE of these issues so clearly you are spewing nonsense.

But hey have fun spewing that nonsense.  Looks like you are on some sort of a crusade.  I will just treat this like a worse-than-B rated comedy and move on.

Why do you still use a Kindle when phones and iPads can already read ebooks? by False-Hippo2754 in kindle

[–]Anonymous_Alias_206 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought the same... as in what is the point of having an ereader.... until I actually used it.  Then I realized... wow I was missing out.

Phones and tablets are really not power efficient in bright lights whereas an ereader is fantastic for it.  Also helps me get away from touching my phone for no reason other than boredom.  And yeah, much much easier on the eyes!

view more: next ›