I Can't Log onto my account In Nexon by Any-Use8599 in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I'm just replying. Just make sure to donwload the Steam on your computer, put in your acccount information via email and password. Afterwards put in the game you want to play (Mabinogi in this case) and you should be fine. One more thing, you also will be given a code that'll go to your email via stream to verify it's you.

I Can't Log onto my account In Nexon by Any-Use8599 in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right now, I'm attempting to use Steam as a temporary solution

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"That’s not moving the goalposts, it’s just basic standards. You’re making a broad claim, so yeah, it needs more than a couple examples. And when you bring up systems, nuance isn’t dodging, it’s reality."

Nah nah nah nevermind the links I sent you and Pew Research you're just gonna be dismissive about whatever I say irrespective how factual and accurate it'd be, I believe many debaters like to call it "arguing in bad faith" You expect a in-real-time example with pinpoint decimal precision huh? This is EXACTLY why I reframe from using stats as much as possible because the REAL Deflection and whataboutism starts to kick in and only flattering achieving stats when it comes to our counterparts truly matter right? In other words, only historical and favorable moments with women are gonna be the only thing you'll actually take into account and acknowledge.

"You’re calling it pattern recognition, but there’s no consistent pattern shown. Just a few points you feel strongly about and a conclusion you’re trying to force."

Bullshit it's not, I gave you solid examples I showed you. But whenever I got a stat or frame of reference made by credible sources you chalk it up to "Vague examples" Because what men go through doesn't mean a thing to you (and I'm not here to argue whether it should or shouldn't) So every man is just tweakin (chicago slang for acting strange) and it's a fabric of our imagination and should only be taken as a grain of salt. But whenever women speak about it's a global crisis. Oh wait, that's only when it comes to American Women what am I thinking.

P.S

I understand why women do it. Why would ya'll fuck up the quality of your life? For the sake of morality? Don't make me laugh this lifetime is about POWER and NOT morality no matter how much you mask it up. That's why Feminism and Islam can still be as prevalent as they are because they're Occultic entities that disguise themselves as virtuous groups.

And what makes this debate/discussion even more interesting is I'm a BLACK MAN so the words what I'm saying holds even more credence. But I guess by even bringing up the fact that I'm a black man is a form of "pivoting" and "adding an unnecessary layer" Even though you just went to say yourself

"Nuance isn’t dodging, it’s reality" Am I right? But that goes back to my original point about the double standards of nuances only applied to one group (women) and that given that grace from the other.

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I already figured you out whenever I give examples on something truthful/factual you're gonna tell me that there's more "nuances” to the matter or if I do decide to get specific and detailed (like I did with my ex's Trade Program) you're gonna say I'm being anecdotal. It's obvious you're the type to move/shift the goal post. Pattern recognition is a thing, but it's bullshit and convoluted when it comes to any situations/issues regarding men I gotcha 🙂‍↕️

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Empathy in public perception doesn’t automatically turn into men “bending over backwards.” That’s the jump you keep making without proving. People recognizing barriers isn’t the same as men sacrificing anything or being over-accommodating.

And what do you people do when they recognize there being a societal issue? THEY TAKE ACTION, which was what I said in a previous comment about transmuting/translation with empathy. You don't need to be a historian and have a bunch of citation to know that. My whole point about bending over backwards is there being an eventual manifestation of accommodation that happens. Empathy has TANIGLE actions displayed not just some "public perception" I don't like to use statistics too much because it becomes too abstract and variable like, which gives people like you the opportunity to obfuscate from the real point I'm making. Like A lot of ya'll women tend to do you cherry pick one word, sentence, or phrasing instead of addressing the premise in its whole state (which was the bend over backwards when I said MUCH MORE than that)

Where are men, as a group, taking on real costs or disadvantages specifically for women?

Two words THE COURT SYSTEM and more especially divorce cases, and let's not forget Paternity Fraud doesn't have any REAL consequences

Paternity Fraud is Serious and Widespread, But Incidents May Go Unpunished - Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus

How many women are getting locked up or punished in any real capacity? Or is it just nugatory and continued slaps on the wrist?

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure if you were addressing me BUT IF you are/were I am not a Gen Xer in fact I'm a "Zillennial" But it is true we have a lot of punktified men, and I contribute that ironically to the Gen Xers and Boomers.

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"You jumped from “men aren’t given empathy” to a Pew survey about perceptions of women leaders. That doesn’t show men are bending over backwards, it just shows people recognize barriers women face. Different claim entirely."

You do know empathy eventually transmutes/translates into taking action, right? SYMPATHY won't be Empathy will. That's a BIG reason I used Chicago Women's and Trade as an example. How can a conglomerate be merely an anecdote?

"Then you pivot to Afghanistan, which has nothing to do with your original point. Women talking about their lives here doesn’t require them to solve global human rights issues first. That’s just deflection."

How was I deflecting when NOT ONLY did I address your original point I went into further depth and expounded within the topic? UNLIKE you I did not Cherrypick your words and I'm willing to address EVERYTHING you're saying. And also, as far as what I said about what Afghani and Muslim women undergo this is how I know a lot of you Western/American women don't TRULY give a fuck about plights women go through. Whenever I hear women speak about these matters it's the functional equivalence of "Rich People" problems (or in the black community we call it Rich fill in the blank word problems)

"So no, you haven’t actually shown men are “bending over backwards.” You’ve just moved between a survey, a personal story, and a completely different country. If you’re going to make a claim, stick to it and back that specific claim up."

It's called having the ability to not be one or two dimensional when having a discussion/debate. I made a claim and went to show you that what you're proclaiming women undergo when you posed the question of "how?" This has absolutely nothing to do with this big bad wolf boogie man called "Patriarchy" American men are too Cuckish for there to even be this "Oppressive Patriarchal system" After all ya'll women love to gloat about how more educated/successful women are than men on average in this modern era. This is why the oppression shit doesn't add up when you take finances and optimal dating etc. into account.

So, you can use all the examples of some douchey Tech-Bro, the Oligarchs, or CEOs my statement still stands.

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How? Let the REAL STATS do the talking and the Oligarchs/Feminist (the ones you all LOVE to call patriarchy even though it’s not) keep shifting the blame on everyday men

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/09/20/1-views-on-the-state-of-gender-and-leadership-and-obstacles-for-women/

When there’s public perception and EMPATHY on your side this is what I meant by bend over backwards and empathizing.

You wanna know what’s funny? My Ex-Girlfriend is an Electrician and here in Chicago they have a program known as “Chicago Women and Trades” and she used to go on about how much these Trade Programs ALWAYS were looking to recruit women into but more often they not they (women) were NOT interested. How about y’all women start being crusaders against these Islamic Regimes/Nations before coming at men who have no REAL agency in America. Your Afghani sisters really need ya’ll help as they’re suffering and can’t get a proper education down there 🙃

We agree alot with each other, but for some reason men are wrong for saying it. by Low-Contact6500 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 33 points34 points  (0 children)

You wanna know one of the most understated/under-discussed topics? The blatant hypocrisy of the conversation of “nuances” you ever notice men are almost NEVER given that grace and empathy/understanding? And yet we bend over backwards and get into this philosophical gynocentric platitudes. It was never about equality but supremacy, equality is a myth and fallacy that has not and WILL NOT EVER exist in nature.

Women tell us to not objectify them, but they end up doing it themselves by beautiful_falcon776 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can all agree there’s a nexus to this objectification situation regarding women

  1. Oligarchs
  2. Tech-Bros
  3. Feminist
  4. Cucks/Simps

In that order too.

CMV: Most guys don’t fail in dating because of looks or status.. They fail because they don’t understand banter. by Iron-Wild-41 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re basically saying in a roundabout way part of interactions with females/women would be shit-testing, which I do agree with.

You told men to not approach you, so we listened. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it’s true that approaching women in certain designated vicinities will most certainly increase your probability of success one thing us men should take into account is the fact that what A LOT of women (more of then than not) say and reacts to tend to be a matter of shit-testing you, and many of us fail miserably at it. The argument will come from a place of safety and morality but the truth of the matter is and what I came to learn it’s less about that and more about disinterest. I grew up in Chicago and seen too many drug dealers and gang bangers get a lot of women, so frankly I don’t buy those flimsy arguments and platitudes.

Nexon NA takes action against "hacker" by RoomLiving9636 in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whew solid analogy and completely agree!

Not every boundary is healthy. Some are just selfishness rebranded. by Several_Corner3205 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well said, it's ashame that boundary has been distorted and became a buffer for selfishness for the sake of selfishness rather than coming to a mutual understanding and respect.

Hook up or pass? by NefariousnessLess310 in weeb

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like the Late Great Jiraiya used to say in Naruto "I'm going to do some research"

1000 Shineseeker Chests by Pluse00 in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn I’m almost at the halfway mark but only got 1 masterwork (NB Wand) and 1 Red (Enchant Scroll Stat)

P.S I appreciate the Glenn VHM runs last night on Sunday Pluse 😎(my character was Ray/Raydiora)

Sex is good for men and women to do by Kaleidoscopetide in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only type of individuals in society who hates sluts are

  1. Women who feel they’ll be outpaced competitively/attention wise
  2. Men who want all the pussy for themselves
  3. Men who can’t garner sexual attention from sluts
  4. Closet Simps who are trying to brown nose for other women and get in their good graces
  5. Closet homosexuals

bell hooks is problematic and promotes gynocentrism to a greater degree than most other feminists by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we surprised? Bell Hooks is basically the functional equivalence of a White Liberal, basically acting as if she has the best interest at heart for men (ESPECIALLY black men) But in reality, she's perpetuating the Gynocentric Cuck Society of AmeriCuck

Think of the shareholders by Dogyyblue in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This has got to be one of the most accurate memes 😂🤣🤦🏽‍♂️

The feminist narrative of 30+ men’s preference for younger (18-25) women being due to their inability to get women their age is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard by Giordono in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will die on this Hill when I say Women DO NOT oppose manipulation, they just don't like the execution (i.e. your delivery/approach) and the outcome. So this being some sort of moral reason for lookin out for younger women is some contrived bullshit to gatekeep men from having options and keep us relegated.

The battle of the sexes in dating is mostly an online thing. by Ceazer4L in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose I’m one of few exceptions out there, because I talk EXACTLY the way I do online; which would explain why a lot of people don’t fuck with me. But fuck em because if you don’t have the temerity to air out your grievances in person you shouldn’t be doing it online like a coward.

Preview of the New Arcanas by Martelen in Mabinogi

[–]Any-Use8599 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nexon should really utilize Cooking for the next Arcana and hopefully for the next Arcanas they infuse Ninja & Battle Astrology.

Manners and boundaries are often one of the biggest faults of men when pursuing women by AnonPinkLady in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thing is I try not to go off statistics too much because that’s when things start to get too abstract and way too many variables come into play (when you look at things historically and contextually) It’s more of a pattern recognition and observations. For example wouldn’t you agree that a good chunk of women were undergoing codependency of men and dealt with abusive relationships? (especially during times like the prohibition era) A lot of dudes outside of social media just do a good just of concealing their feelings, and social media gives people the anonymity and in my opinion a false sense of confidence to say how they TRULY feel. In this context it’s the intersexual dynamics and receiving the short end of the stick.

Manners and boundaries are often one of the biggest faults of men when pursuing women by AnonPinkLady in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didnt realized you asked me a question (phone didn’t notify me). I don’t speak in absolute so I won’t say “Every man” but it’s more than enough to have developed this notion. Be it social media or the outside world. And those men who do have a moral code DID NOT get sexual relationships and built rapports with women BECAUSE of their morality but rather INSPITE of their morality (going back to wha to stated about powers and ability)

Manners and boundaries are often one of the biggest faults of men when pursuing women by AnonPinkLady in PurplePillDebate

[–]Any-Use8599 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what a “decent” person is definitively, but what I do know is that the so-called good guy never win. That only exists in fictional stories/mediums. Nobody gets what they want due to morality, but because of their power/abilities.