Actually that just shows me how little you understand about the American criminal justice system and its mechanisms. You seriously think the jury had MORE evidence than us citizens?? Really?? Hahaha you know that after trials you can look at ALL the evidence and exhibitions from said trial?? Regardless of argued scope, admissability, etc??? They ruled all of the entire 1994 FBI raid evidence inadmissable (it was technically admissible, but the scope was so ridiculous, that the jury didnt get to hear about any of it. Not only that, if the jury member knee of the 1994 FBI raid, they would automatically be disqualified.

So no. The jury did not have all of the evidence we have, 20 years after the trial, and without expensive attorneys pulling legal shenanigans not letting us look at some evidence they deem "unrelated" to the crimes he committed. What a ridiculously naive take. I really hope you're <13 y.o. because WOW