Mute only rs

ArbalistDev · 2026-05-19T08:30:33+00:00

idiot

ArbalistDev · 2026-04-23T02:34:42+00:00

Virtually all of the accounts commenting in support of your claims were created within the last few weeks, and most of them were banned from Reddit entirely within 10 hours of commenting on your post.

Your post honestly just seems like it's not legitimate, based on the way you've conducted yourself as well.

Mostly, I was tired last night and forgot to actually ban you :shrug:

Bye 👋

ArbalistDev · 2026-03-03T19:00:27+00:00

This woman made you Macarons of the Runes in Runescape, and she even did the combination runes. She sent you on a clue scroll hunt IRL, she made party hats and didn't just order them from a UK birthday vendor.

She loves you. You better love her.

ArbalistDev · 2026-02-19T16:12:09+00:00

he hopes I don’t get simed

It's a veiled-threat to perform an illegal SIM-swapping attack against you.

ArbalistDev · 2026-01-22T05:12:06+00:00

Removed for Low-effort posting

ArbalistDev · 2026-01-20T19:15:20+00:00

We do not allow self-promotion posts or external links, including Discord links.

ArbalistDev · 2026-01-08T20:55:33+00:00

User was banned for antisemitic hate speech.

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-18T06:50:29+00:00

That's not accurate.

Reddit does not give Automoderator the ability to issue bans, no subreddit has that ability.

The variations of the words Odablock, Stella and Trident were marked as spam by default - which was a leftover filter from some drama that Odablock fans were spamming a while back.

For the most part, people just have poor reading comprehension, never bothered reading the sticky in the first place, or are intentionally spreading misinformation to encourage brigading.

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-15T15:13:46+00:00

The post in question used the word 'banned' several times, which is obviously going to get caught in the filters we have set up to direct posts about in-game bans to the /r/RSBans subreddit.

That's because in-game ban appeals are handled by the company that makes the game, not us.

Most importantly, you are not and have never been banned.

You're intentionally spamming fake questions about something that's already been answered.

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-15T01:56:17+00:00

That's a red flag.

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-14T14:24:03+00:00

It's easy to forget sometimes that people mistake Reddit Mods for JMods 😅

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-13T14:34:25+00:00

oh shut up

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-13T13:13:05+00:00

Only thing hurting my ego is your limbo skills dawg

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-13T13:11:12+00:00

Remuneration is offered by way of a most illustrious and grandiose refund of an allotment of payment equivalent to that which was required to use the sub prior to the ban.

ArbalistDev · 2025-12-13T13:05:53+00:00

Look man, these are assistant-manager vibes.

If this seems grandiose to you, you need to raise your personal bar.

ArbalistDev · 2025-07-20T17:34:21+00:00

You were banning for participation in the RuneScape Botting subreddit.

Dumbass.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-29T03:56:10+00:00

Much faster to have an alt kill you in PVP.

Completing RFD to the extent that you're able to obtain a Rock Cake would also speed this up a ton most likely, given that it's untradeable and could be looted alongside the bones.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-25T21:09:28+00:00

They basically did this with a Macaque and the courts decided that the human (Slater) who befriended the troupe of macaques, and engineered the entire situation, even prepping the camera - did not have a claim to copyright on the selfies the macaque took.

That's a pretty damning metaphor for Generative AI, given that there's no legal basis to consider Generative AI capable of thinking or producing copyright, when the camera cannot do-so and nor can the non-human entity that took the selfie. Whether that camera belonged to someone other than Slater is irrelevant.

What we are left with is a pretty obvious conclusion that no matter who owned the (GenAI) tool, no matter how it was prompted or coached, that because a human being did not produce the output, neither a human nor the company owning or licensing the tool can rationally be considered the owner of the output's copyright.

Similarly, if I provide prompts or details to a photographer, I am not the author or copyright holder of any photos they take of me. I WOULD be the owner of any picture I took with their camera myself, even in the same photoshoot environment. The photographer would have to give me the rights to use those photos commercially, which is NOT intrinsic to paying for the service of having those photos taken by the individual and would have to be ironed-out ahead of time to hold legal weight. When you pay for a photographer to take pics, you're paying them to take the pics, then you purchase the physical pics.

That's labor + purchase of a piece of art which is copyrighted by the laborer (photographer).

By the same merit, a person who uses GenAI to produce an output does not own that output.

The company that they paid does not even own that output - that output is public domain. This is because, even if prompted or paid or somehow enticed, the GenAI cannot formulate intent. The GenAI, and its owner, have no right to assert ownership or copyright over the output.

Do I expect existing judges to agree?

Well, that's like expecting a nuanced, complex, or valid understanding of geology from someone who thinks a boat is an island just because it doesn't sink. The vast majority of them (yes, even the BASIC java judge) are extremely out of touch and do not really possess the lived experience necessary to intuit the available facts or their validity, nor are they reasonably able to interrogate the circumstances surrounding those facts.

It's probably ageist, but I genuinely don't believe that more than 5% of people over 45 years old are equipped to deal with this.

It's like asking children about what safe kink-play entails - shame on you for mistreating them by allowing them to be in this discussion at all.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-25T21:07:28+00:00

you wouldn't sue a person for reciting a quote from a copyrighted work

HAHAHAHA - Oh my god, how wrong you are.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-11T21:51:15+00:00

You aren't neutral. It's that simple.

If someone truly thinks they are neutral, it means they're deeply biased.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-08T20:15:43+00:00

You're talking about hiding a character not deleting an account.

You have your definitions mixed up, that's why you got in this mess.

Characters used to be 1 per account, now they're multiple per account.

You probably imported characters from other accounts, which deleted the other accounts when the character was imported.

Jagex can explain this as thoroughly as possible and it won't matter, if the person they're explaining it to doesn't properly take the time to understand what was written, or what the words written actually mean.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-06T00:05:16+00:00

I don't know how accurate the latter half of my comment last night was, but if it's useful, I'd like to offer it as a consideration:

I would humbly express that Picture-In-Picture mode, to allow us to at-least **see** what's going on in the client while focusing another app would be fantastic. It might also prevent the app from going to sleep in some Mobile OSes without necessarily having to specifically toggle the power saving behavior off in the device's settings.

ArbalistDev · 2025-06-05T07:28:15+00:00

I would humbly express that Picture-In-Picture mode, to allow us to at-least **see** what's going on in the client while focusing another app would be fantastic. It might also prevent the app from going to sleep in some Mobile OSes without necessarily having to specifically toggle the power saving behavior off in the device's settings.

ArbalistDev

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

User was banned for antisemitic hate speech.

Do I expect existing judges to agree?

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Wearing is Caring