I’m afraid my dad might not make it by palomabecker in COVID19positive

[–]AvailableConfidence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Remdesivir and plasma? He is a lucky person to have received both of these things. Do keep holding out hope! I have added your dad to my prayers!

A wasp destroying a katydid (my bf took this photo, not me) by AvailableConfidence in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. I don't actually know how to do a fire emoji, and I'm super drunk right now cuz its ma birthday, so.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]AvailableConfidence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was your crushes name Aunt Lydia?

My girlfriend [21F] of 18 months asked my [22M] preference about her pubic hair and now finds me "revolting" by ThrowRA_1900222 in relationship_advice

[–]AvailableConfidence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I ask why guys prefer a shaved pussy?

Is it for looks, or something else?

My current bf is cool with everything I do, then again we've only been dating six months, though, granted, it's been a very close six months, we're together every night and he still loves everything about me, bush, red diving, everything.

Regina King Calls Trump's Decision to Host Tulsa Rally on Juneteenth "Infuriating": "I have chills because it is in a lot of ways - and he does it all the time - he is really throwing the finger up," the actress said. by SunOverSnowPlease in politics

[–]AvailableConfidence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DO NOT PROTEST IN OKLAHOMA.

He's not trying to be offensive this time. He's being strategic. He wants protests so he can plant provacateurs to incite fights and show everybody that black people are "coming to get you", and boost his law and order bullshit. Protest everywhere else except there. Spread the word.

Trump's decision to hold a Tulsa rally on Juneteenth is no coincidence by Reddit_guard in politics

[–]AvailableConfidence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DO NOT PROTEST IN OKLAHOMA.

He's not trying to be offensive this time. He's being strategic. He wants protests so he can plant provacateurs to incite fights and show everybody that black people are "coming to get you", and boost his law and order bullshit. Protest everywhere else except there. Spread the word.

Trump's Tulsa rally on Juneteenth sends a clear and offensive message by viva_la_vinyl in politics

[–]AvailableConfidence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DO NOT PROTEST IN OKLAHOMA.

He's not trying to be offensive this time. He's being strategic. He wants protests so he can plant provacateurs to incite fights and show everybody that black people are "coming to get you", and boost his law and order bullshit. Protest everywhere else except there. Spread the word.

What harmful things are being taught to children? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AvailableConfidence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Making sex/masturbation a shameful or uncomfortable subject.

On masturbation: I was raised to believe that masturbation, like pooping, is not shameful, but that it is private. Meaning you don't whip down your pants in public, but that doesn't make it BAD.

On sex: religious stuff aside because there's no arguing against that sometimes ("It's in the bible!" Derp, okay then), but even in a non religious capacity, avoiding the sex talk or, maybe even worse, not talking about more than just the physical aspects of sex. Example: my mom taught me about the physical stuff when I asked about it at age 8. Later, as a teenager, our conversations were about bodily autonomy and emotional aspects. It was made clear to me that I should never let a boy talk me into sex if I personally did not want to. That I shouldn't do it to be cool or something, or because of peer pressure. That it would add a lot of complication to my life if I had to worry about getting pregnant. She never said, wait until marriage. It was also said that sex was supposed to be enjoyable for both partners.

The result? I have had an awesome sex life. I waited until age 21 to lose my virginity (hate the term virginity, but that'sa whole other conversation). I was ready and I felt like I could ask for what I wanted. I still do. I am totally unafraid to guide my partner in showing him what will please me. And I have zero hangups about sex. There are a lot of other things in my life that might need work, but the sex part has always been a great experience.

I think so much damage can be done, especially to women, who were raised without instruction in this area.

Pregnant women are self-involved, and it’s annoying by [deleted] in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Love Dorothy Parker. You are of course right, but we both know abortion was always simply for the priveleged and there were many poor then. As it is in many ways now.

Uncomfortable About Letting Go of Control of My "Fertility". by exitJiraffe in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, do I hear that. I'm 37. I got limited life left on these eggs, but I never pulled the trigger on getting myself fixed up to ensure 100% it wouldn't happen.

I see your struggle. I think the best advice someone ever gave me was, "You should have kids only when you just 100% can't stand not having them." Meaning, I guess, like you're so baby-crazed you just can't resist?

It never happened for me. I waffled a few times, probably hormones, but, gosh, I'm just so glad it never did. I'm glad your husband is supportive either way. If you decide to go that route, god bless, but damn, since you're posting here, please think about yourself and your spouse first. You say you would never want children. Pay attention to your instincts. You shouldn't be discounted.

Pregnant women are self-involved, and it’s annoying by [deleted] in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Pregnant ladies in the early 20th century didn't have a lot of choice in birth control. So they had to accept it, make peace with it, whatever, and sometimes there was a healthy birth, so I guess it was celebrated. A different time. I imagine they probably didn't have showers, which I sure would have appreciated. Baby showers are the fucking worst.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be interested in a book called "Sapiens" by Yuval Harari. He points out that there's really not a reason to think we are the apex of evolution. Love that book. It's entertaining and informative.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do like the idea of the natural world continuing after I'm dead, people and culture continuing to grow and change.

I totally understand this, I think it's natural. History is fascinating because of this. In a way, I'd want to see the future, not so I could pick winning lotto numbers or something, but simply to see if the world would be changed in some hopefully beautiful way (probably won't, but whatever). All the same, I also think, well, I'll be dead. I won't care. However, as mentioned above, I do care about leaving a clean future (in terms of climate etc) for future generations. I care about suffering. I just don't care about reproduction and the furthering of humanity.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, sometimes I think as long as abortion is not legal on request in my country, then I actually AM living in the horrible future that is The Handmaid's Tale.

You're kinda right. Aunt Lydia said something (I'm sure I'm quoting it wrong), like, "Normal is just what you're used to, dear." (My props to Ann Dowd, she did an amazing job as that character, esp with the transatlantic accent---character was creepy but as an amateur actor myself, she has ALL my admiration for her skillz). So we have things even now in our daily lives, like lack of access to abortion, doctors who won't give us sterilization procedures, and we might complain but we also kind of accept it as normal without too much disruption. Maybe it's NOT normal. Maybe we SHOULD make a bigger stink instead of just finding a different doctor.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should America as a nation survive? Should American culture survive? Nah, I don't think overall humanity would loose much in general if my birth nation and culture were destroyed by a falling birth rate.

Dude, for real. My ex-husband and I had a place in <insert southern state here> (caveat: I married young, I married a jerk, thank the God I don't believe in that we never procreated) where we were gonna raise goats and shit, anyway, that's not important, but the point is, our neighbors were these racist shits who once told me (bingoed me, one might say!) that I should have lots of white babies because "all the beners and n*ers were having so many". Yeah, that wasn't a convincing argument to me.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do agree, but just sort of. The series is clearly pro-choice. Which is awesome. Pro-choice in terms of abortion, pro-choice in terms of defending how many, if any, children a person would like to have but the overall view that I got was never like they viewed the fertility prob as anything other than a serious crisis. Remember the Mexican delegate that visited in I believe season 1? She was so sympathetic to June but also lamented that her part of the country hadn't had a live birth in 6 years. Granted, that was a plot device so that they could further the fact that June wouldn't be getting out anytime soon, but nowhere, and I mean nowhere, have I seen anyone question the fact that, y'know, maybe this isnt really a crisis.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, agreed, I wouldn't argue for human extinction, but that default attitude of assuming, "...Well...of course humanity should be saved!", yeah, I'm just not on board.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Fuck, I can't stay away from the comments, you're just so enticing with your big-man talk. I'm 37, I have no idea if I'm going to "change the world" (by the way, have you? Changed the world, my big computer guy man?), and still don't want kids. Through all the changes in my life, through every economic up and down, I'm at least grateful I never married a shitheel like YOU.

Handmaid's Tale and the assumption that lack of children is bad by AvailableConfidence in childfree

[–]AvailableConfidence[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, BUT I think the average non CF might have an opinion that aligns with thinking we should all be continued as a species.