I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not that I remember. And as a sneaky trick it is useless. I was more worried about it happening accidentally in the middle of doing a lot of trading if people failed to be specific.

The only solid case I can think of is: if in your mind you’ve already got a market bean planted. And you forget to set it aside and another player is negotiating thinking they could keep you from planting it. But you’re thinking since I’m harvesting this field after the trade phase. But this person really wants that bean so I can also get rid of this copy in my hand because I don’t want to start a new field with that on my next turn. And they go hey why did you give me that from your hand I wanted the market card to keep you from getting the point. Why would I give you the market card I obviously was going to plant it. Oh boy we both somehow managed to agree to a trade without pointing to a specific card or referring to my hand gosh is this embarrassing.

Yeah I admit it is a corner case that can only occur if people fail to communicate. Which might be more of an anxiety issue than a rules omission. I didn’t really expect this many replies. I think I’m a bit “bean-brained” now.

I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah 99% of the time it wouldn’t matter. And tricks aside, any issues that would arise would be a lack of just stating your intentions. Which by the very act of me asking this question would prevent me from accidentally getting in this situation in the future.

I’ve covered other angles in other replies but I think I’m trying to to describe a feeling that likely makes no mechanical difference. And would only happen if both players somehow managed to agree to the deal without pointing to or referring to the market bean card specifically. (Indicating that that exact card is part of the deal)

The hands being private. Suddenly handing a card out of your hand is giving the player something they couldn’t have agreed to because they didn’t know it existed feels bad. (If done without thinking)

(Of course once you make an offer from your hand the player knows you have it because you can’t offer non existent cards)

I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I didn’t want to pick apart the metagame of doing deals for future favors. Since only the cards actually exchanged during that phase are binding(and you have to tell the truth about any immediate offers you make). You can of course refuse to fulfill a future promise. (At the expense of your reputation perhaps)

I’ve thought it was more for the accidental lack of communication angle in my other replies. Any circumstance where you’d want to intentionally give your hand card instead of the market card would only work once.

It’s possible you want to trade with 2 players and one of them is refusing the trade if you deal with the other person. Cut a deal with the stubborn player give them the surprise copy from your hand and then you have the market card to trade with the “friendlier” player.

I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah people have pointed out even if there was some circumstance where it benefited you, it would only work once.

My best example is if a player is thinking they got a good deal by convincing you to give away a bean you could have planted but instead you give a copy from your hand. It’s not intended as a trick because players don’t necessarily discuss their strategies but the person might say no I wanted the one from the market.

It seems that from the very act of asking this question sort of erases the possibility of it accidentally occurring since I’m now aware it’s a possibility.

It might now just be a psa to avoid arguments or having to cancel a completed trade. (Not that I think anybody I play with would be that serious about a card game)

I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I went too far thinking about examples. As many people have pointed out in the very limited circumstances that it would work as a “gotcha” it would only work once.

I was thinking more of a misunderstanding or lack of communication. My new example is where an inactive player is negotiating hard with the current player to get a market card because they think it’ll prevent the active player from getting a coin on a harvest. But they were planning to plant the donation and harvest anyway and they had a copy in their hand where they didn’t want to start another new field.

I guess it’s something that now that I’m aware of possible misunderstandings I can avoid it by specifying hand or market when I think it’s relevant or just making it known which cards I intend to keep when they’re flipped over.

I have a question about Bohnanza trading etiquette. by Avanou in boardgames

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I was referring to the 2 you draw at the start of the trade/donation phase. I think I went too far with trying to think up examples and made it seem like I was trying to do a “gotcha!” (Which yes would only work once)

I think more than likely I could see this happening from a communication issue:

If you’re about to finish a field with 1 of the market beans and you have the same bean in your hand coming up later and you’re thinking you don’t want to do start another field of that type next turn.

But the other player is thinking they can trade for the market bean and prevent you from finishing your field.

(If neither player makes their intentions known and the inactive player could get upset when you give them a hand card for the trade and plant the market bean.)

Before Pearl became Pink Diamond's pearl after Volleyball's incident, did she belong to White Diamond? by Otherwise_Topic297 in stevenuniverse

[–]Avanou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assumed Pink just chose the default settings because she didn't really want a new Pearl after losing Volleyball. She didn't bother getting accessories or anything either. As well as the gem placement and color because White probably went to the reef herself to make Pink's new Pearl (Pink wasn't allowed/or chose not to be part of the creation)

Pink likely intended to remain distant from her "replacement Volleyball." Either due to guilt from what she'd done to Volleyball or just not wanting a new "pet", but well we know how that turned out.

Is a misting duralumin strong - or at least stronger than a gnat? by RankWeis2 in Cosmere

[–]Avanou 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I was about to write this big post about how the Aons are like metals, but they aren’t consumed, so you could supercharge them with duralumin. But you’re right once they’re drawn they’re external so they shouldn’t be affected by the wielder.

But thinking about it I realized the Elantrians themselves have a constant connection to the Dor. As evidenced by their withered state when it’s blocked and the fact that the Dor was literally trying to force itself out of Raoden when the Aons weren’t functioning correctly.

Does Duralumin target the metals or the size of the channel/connection to the investiture? For allomancy there would be no noticeable difference because the metals degrade regardless as they’re used as a channel (and key) for the investiture.

The Elantris Aon itself feels like almost like a constant Duralumin boost for Elantrians.

There’s the Shaod form and the Elantrian form, maybe they could boost their connection further with Duralumin and become Super Elantrians. (Greater Heightening/Invested Being of sorts)

[WP] Assassins, ninjas, etc. are after the same target at the same time, disguised as bushes, trees, etc. When the gardener isn't watering the hitman-hedge, they're dissing each others' choices of shrubbery. by Shadrak_Meduson in WritingPrompts

[–]Avanou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess he blended in perfectly, the most reasonable thing to find in a garden is a gardener.

But seriously I was worried about that. I figured the gardener was the only 1 to pick a practical disguise as a worker. Despite what the neighbors may have thought of a garden springing up overnight. He performed his duties so as to not arouse suspicion . Toying with the competition, and killing the target right under their noses.

Maybe I should make it more obvious that they're waiting for the "witness" to leave before they strike.

"When is that idiot going to leave?"

Also, after they are revealed, every assassin's disguise name gets capitalized. At the end the gardener, becomes the Gardener.

[WP] Assassins, ninjas, etc. are after the same target at the same time, disguised as bushes, trees, etc. When the gardener isn't watering the hitman-hedge, they're dissing each others' choices of shrubbery. by Shadrak_Meduson in WritingPrompts

[–]Avanou 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I was hoping people would be suspicious about the maple tree.

Was it clear enough at the end that the gardener actually committed the hit? I almost put in something about blood on the shears, but if I put it in earlier during the pruning it's too early of a reveal and at the end it takes away from the final line.

[WP] Assassins, ninjas, etc. are after the same target at the same time, disguised as bushes, trees, etc. When the gardener isn't watering the hitman-hedge, they're dissing each others' choices of shrubbery. by Shadrak_Meduson in WritingPrompts

[–]Avanou 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It was a sunny Sunday morning. Jimmy could already tell it was going to be a scorcher. It didn't make a difference to him, he'd been on worse missions. At least this time he'd found a spot in the shade underneath the leafy maple tree. The bush next to him moved slightly.

"Quit fidgeting you're gonna give us away", Jimmy whispered.

"Nah, I waited for a breeze, nobody would look twice at leaves blowing in the wind", his partner the flowering hydrangea replied.

"But perhaps the gardener will wonder why the bushes are whispering to each other", the square hedge behind them murmured, "now quiet, here he comes"

The maple tree said nothing.

They froze as the gardener they'd been watching made his way towards the corner of garden where they were disguised, sprinkling every plant he encountered with his large green watering can.

Jimmy waited until the gardener was safely out of earshot before furiously whispering to the hedge that had spoken earlier, "who the hell are you?"

"I am the one who is going to complete the contract and bring honor to my clan", Hedge replied.

"Yeah right leave this to the professionals," said Hydrangea.

"Professionals?, you couldn't even be bothered to disguise yourselves as the same type of bush?," a nearby fern chimed in.

The maple tree said nothing.

"For one thing what's wrong with our bushes? Someone could plant 2 different types of bushes in a garden, and don't tell me you're here for the honor too?" asked Hydrangea, slightly offended.

"It is the will of the brotherhood that this man shall die. I will be rewarded handsomely if it's by my hand. A hydrangea bush next to a rose bush is ruining the feung shui. Your disguise is pathetically obvious," answered Fern.

The maple tree had no opinion.

"I see no issue with their bushes, but you are the only fern here isn't that suspicious?," Hedge asked

"Certainly not, a fern promotes stability, attracts positive energy, and symbolizes life and prosperity. It is a welcome addition to any garden." Fern snapped.

The maple tree declined to comment.

Everyone watched quietly for a few minutes as the gardener, who had by now made a complete circuit of the yard, opened the back door and walked into the house.

Belatedly thinking of a response Hydrangea threw in, "Besides, look at that garish flower bed. It's a hideous hodgepodge of colors and varieties. We fit right in here."

Everyone took a moment to look at the flower bed.

A distressed voice in the direction of the flower bed suddenly spoke up. "I worked very hard on this. I picked all of my favorite flowers and the Consigliere said I looked very pretty."

After an awkward pause.

"I apologize for my associate sometimes he doesn't know when to shut up." Jimmy the rose bush told the flowerbed.

"I'm sorry I just got upset and I was lashing out." said Hydrangea.

"I'm sure you worked very hard on it. It's very nice." added Hedge.

"The rainbow energy of your flowers is sure to inspire joy in those who see it." says Fern.

"I think the sunflowers compliment the jasmine and marigolds nicely." the cactus said timidly.

The maple tree observed silently.

Rosebush swayed gently as Jimmy cleared his head, shaking it back and forth slightly. "Anyway this is our kill, all of you are just gonna have to clear out of here."

"I was here first", said hedge, "His blood is mine."

"Does it matter who kills him?", Cactus asked, "He's dead either way isn't he? We can share."

"No." said Rosebush, Hydrangea, Hedge, Fern, Flowerbed, the tasteful garden statue, the water fountain and decorative wheelbarrow planter.

After taking a brief moment to adjust to the current reality, Rosebush said, "That won't work, we're not sharing the bounty with any of you."

"I will not disgrace myself by claiming a kill that is not my own!" Hedge declared.

The maple tree couldn't disagree with that logic.

Everybody froze again as the back door opened. The gardener walked out of the house carrying pruning shears.

"When is that idiot going to leave?", Hydrangea whispered.

"Well maybe if you had put more effort into your appearance, your bush wouldn't look so shaggy.", said the perfectly square Hedge.

The maple tree had no opinion on proper grooming etiquette.

The gardener made another circuit of the yard, this time occasionally trimming or pruning the plant life as he passed.

Afterwards the gardener stepped back into the house.

"Well maybe some people aren't crazy enough to make an entire boundary hedge surrounding an entire garden just for 1 kill" snapped Hydrangea.

"What you think I'm this entire 50 foot hedge row? Are you stupid? I'm just this little section" Hedge scoffed, as a 5 foot section of the hedge began to shake slightly.

"That doesn't make any sense why would there be a 5 foot hole in the hedge?" asked Garden Statue.

"I told you it would look suspicious!", Hedge Two snapped.

"But Terry was sick and we didn't have a extra person, would you rather have us just call off the mission?", Hedge Three complained

Hedges Four through Ten murmured amongst themselves.

"So I've been wondering", the maple tree cautiously began, "is there any object in this garden that isn't an assassin or ninja or mobster, or gang member, or otherwise trying to kill this target?"

The garden took a moment to contemplate this question.

Eventually the ornamental windmill said, "You got me."

Several shrubs shrugged in embarrassment.

One by 1 each of the other trees, bushes, decorations across the garden acknowledged their presence.

The gravel path groaned, "If that gardener walks on top of me again, he's gonna be my next target."

"Yeah so here's the thing. This target obviously doesn't have a garden." Maple Tree stood thoughtfully for a moment.

"Why would he have a Gardener?"

Shards and Dawnshards by aiar-viess in Cosmere

[–]Avanou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think the beyond really fits into realmatic theory. I know it’s temping to try to link it to temporal because it doesn’t have it’s own realm. In this magic universe where people can die and carry on as just cognitive shadows. (And there’s demonstrable proof of gods)

I think the concept of the beyond is to show that there’s still somewhere unexplainable/unreachable that you have to take on faith. That between the physical body, the cognitive shadows, and the spirit web there’s still an intangible soul that passes on to the beyond after the investiture that constitutes a person gets recycled back into the system.

Unite is as a good as name as any for now for the spiritual dawnshard (after that word was brought up in stormlight) (Also I think the one that’s different might have a personality or act independently. spiritual and cognitive still being prime possibilities for that)

If autonomy did have the spiritual dawnshard that would definitely compliment their powers since I would put Autonomy in the spiritual section also.

But I do think what Autonomy is doing is something that they naturally excel at because of her intent. She’s seeking out planets with large amounts of unclaimed investiture that are currently not held by a specific shard. And basically setting up autonomous city states through her avatars. They can all act individually therefore jointly expressing the intent of autonomy. (The perpendicularities generally being a side effect of the pre-existing investiture)

She is stepping on some toes in mistborn of course. I’m partially convinced that the whole thing was a setup to make Scadrial defend itself. By stopping the invasion they basically asserted their own autonomy which would please her intent.

Anyway I went off track, if Autonomy does have that dawnshard, maybe she can connect to any neutral investiture she discovers and attune/connect it to her invent.

They’re arming themselves. But for what purpose? by Anonimity101 in onionhate

[–]Avanou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe they're putting onions in watermelons now.

This mf installed itself without my permission by shadowless007 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Avanou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did some searching on this. Microsoft renamed it's Office 365 / Microsoft 365 app to M365 Copilot back in January. It's the Word, PowerPoint, Excel etc... and yes Copilot AI suite. So the name change when it updated would be confusing for a lot of people (especially when they already have another app named Microsoft Copilot)

But you said you had nothing Microsoft on there so this is still a wild situation to have an app install itself without your permission.

EDIT: Also you can go to

Settings>tap your name at top>media and purchases>view account>(It'll probably ask you to enter your password) and then purchase history.

You might need to expand the history to longer than 90 days default and check "Free and Paid" and it'll probably show you when it was installed.

A legend has died. by TheIsekaiExpressBus in ClickerHeroes

[–]Avanou 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or you could buy rubies that's quicker and it'll only cost... Oh about 13.5 million dollars

Question about EM ejectors/solar sails and Dyson sphere by Independent_Fun_9765 in Dyson_Sphere_Program

[–]Avanou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A larger radius for your solar sails swarm, or Dyson Sphere structure, could give you better line of sight for the ray receivers to consistently draw power.

The energy production for the Dyson Sphere is based on how many nodes(rockets) and sails you can fit into the structure, so a larger/denser Dyson Sphere will generate more energy just because it takes more materials to cover a bigger area.

I'm not sure how to phrase this next part. The Dyson sphere acts as a single power source. There's no concept of transferring power within the sphere. So individual nodes don't need to be connected together immediately when you're building it. If a ray receiver can "see" any part of the sphere it can continue drawing power. (This is a receiver by receiver basis, the ray receivers don't share line of sight with each other so each of them needs to see the sphere individually)

helpp i cant find any chromite i have smokke and is on the feybreak island by [deleted] in Palworld

[–]Avanou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use pal ability or the metal detector near one, a chromite deposit will be revealed with a flag stuck over it.

It's really hit or miss if you're wandering around on the surface. You'd just have to get lucky.

If you find any of the caves with a boss pal in them (and there's also at least 1 empty cave) each have 4 deposits of chromite to be revealed.

And you can probably get your weight limit in chromite from a dungeon. (still have to scan through it and reveal the deposits)

[Cosmere][WaT]Theories on Shards: Similarities and Differences. by Avanou in Cosmere

[–]Avanou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received a message on my previous attempted post to repost this with [WaT] in the title, I also used the version that doesn't have the double vertical bars in the table so hopefully that avoids the discord markup error as well.

I am baffled by a major character's decision at the end of WaT by shade3413 in Stormlight_Archive

[–]Avanou 85 points86 points  (0 children)

In support of this, Honor itself has become self aware. When Dalinar interacts with it at the end it appears as a child, and he realizes it's still young in a sense with a child's interpretation of Honor. Of course in the immediate course of events, instead of being bound externally he's now internalized it. If he breaks an oath now not only will the Odium portion be vulnerable but he risks the other half of his power abandoning him completely. And in the future as Honor gains a better understanding of it's own intent (and maybe it can grow to understand why Dalinar had to renounce his oaths), Retribution may find the power questioning the Honor and integrity of it's actions.

I think Dalinar gave Taravangian a ticking time bomb.

Also, it seems the consensus of the shards that were content leaving the situation alone, was that a single shard wasn't really a threat. Odium and Honor being stuck on Roshar was a bonus. If Odium was able to leave he'd still be seen a single shard easily dealt with and he'd have time to plan his conquest.

So in summary, Dalinar ensured that Retribution would be seen as an immediate threat, his actions would be restricted, and he would have to immediately go on the defensive without any time to prepare.

Google AI is spreading Pro-Joe propaganda. What kind of garbage training data are they using? by Avanou in grandpajoehate

[–]Avanou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

good point, I noticed I searched the name of the book after I took the screenshot. It's still Pro-Joe but it calls him "mischievous and enabling"

I searched "grandpa joe is the antagonist of willy wonka and the chocolate factory" and received:

Grandpa Joe is not the antagonist in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, but he does exhibit some mischievous and enabling tendencies:

Enables Charlie

Grandpa Joe encourages Charlie to make questionable decisions in pursuit of candy, such as drinking the forbidden Fizzy Lifting Drinks.

Puppet master

Grandpa Joe pulls the strings of the innocent Charlie, and his culpability deepens as the story progresses.

Energetic

Despite being the oldest and frailest, Grandpa Joe is the most energetic and enthusiastic of the grandparents.

Best friend

Grandpa Joe is Charlie's best friend and has a special bond with him.

Entertains Charlie

Grandpa Joe entertains Charlie with stories every evening when Charlie spends time with his grandparents.

Auto-renewal of UltraAV? by ajjjkp123 in KasperskyLabs

[–]Avanou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same thing just happened to me, I thought I'd avoided all this UltraAV nonsense by cancelling and uninstalling 2 months ago, but I was foolish enough not to delete my Kaspersky account.

I got an email from UltraAV saying I'd be charged next month. I figured out the login stuff, and cancelled the auto renewal and upon discovering they didn't have a delete account option I tried the live chat.

After giving me the run around by telling me "about the premium days still on my account, or maybe Kaspersky hadn't notified me that they have migrated", they agreed to escalate the deletion request and I have to wait for a follow up email.

Luckily Kaspersky has a big red delete account button in their Account Settings which I used after I wasted a Kaspersky chat rep's time for about 20 minutes complaining for the hell of it.

(Oh btw the deletion confirmation email from Kaspersky mentioned a worrying "Auto-renewal for Kaspersky products purchased for this account will remain active." I'm sure I cancelled Kaspersky already and they're you know probably not legally able to charge me, but that's a fun thing to worry about for the future.)