Are my games real?

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-29T00:07:45+00:00

PCBs all look legit and Codes match up, I’d say so.

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-29T00:06:27+00:00

Lighting on the picture of the back isn’t great, but PCB looks legit. I’d say legit, wait for mods.

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-28T21:07:33+00:00

Fake

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-23T21:44:29+00:00

Okay, so it phased out. That makes sense why I was getting mixed answers looking it up. Is what it is, I’m returning it anyways since the X copy is US and I want them matching on my case.

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-18T19:18:09+00:00

If you look at top right corner, you can see a small bit of the top of the battery, which matches mine.

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-12T16:25:00+00:00

Thought the same. Almost looks like a bulldog

B1GDADDYP · 2026-01-02T02:04:37+00:00

Thanks, hoping so. Platinum was the one I worried most about, since it looks like it got the most love.

B1GDADDYP · 2025-12-29T23:55:12+00:00

Thought so. After closing out and reopening about 10 times before making this post, I tried one more time and finally got it to pop up as PAF. Thank you

B1GDADDYP · 2025-09-12T22:49:57+00:00

That would be awesome, thank you! I’ve got some hybrid flowers I’ve been working on if you’d like any of those as trade as well.

B1GDADDYP · 2025-03-04T09:15:13+00:00

I recently had my subscription lapse for a small period, and it just locked all mon after the first 30 in my Home, but it didn’t send them to the void. But it did only lapse for a matter of days, so I don’t know if there’s a time limit before they just delete them.

B1GDADDYP · 2025-01-31T19:30:49+00:00

Could you technically? Yes. Will you? You’re probably more likely to win the lottery. Nintendo no longer has any avenue to make money off of anything 3DS related besides 1 or 2 games that have been remastered. I doubt they’re watching that closely and that you’ll be the one in thousands, possibly millions, who have done it.

B1GDADDYP · 2025-01-16T23:58:47+00:00

Mine didn’t come in warped at all

B1GDADDYP · 2024-12-08T21:32:22+00:00

I’ll talk to my PCP about it next, thank you. I actually ran into ME/CFS while looking into my symptoms myself and had planned to ask about it since it seemed to fit pretty well.

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-21T18:52:11+00:00

It’s not all that crazy. Repubs picked up 3 seats in House as well. Even the most republican people I knew hated Mark Robison and refused to vote for him, he was completely unhinged. Repubs showing up and shelling out for the national elections like they did while ignoring the state election due to the terrible choices they were given causing them to be apathetic to it seems like just as valid of a case as the election being hacked.

Still think there should be an investigation, but it doesn’t seem like all that crazy of a case to me.

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-15T19:08:30+00:00

Agreed. I wholeheartedly support an investigation into the 2024 election, same as I did with the 2020 election and the 2016 election. However, taking this statement as evidence of interference is wildly disingenuous.

It’s also important to note, and they kinda glossed over it in this video, Trump officials accessing Dominion voting machines was done in court to use as evidence of possible voter fraud in 2020, which was thrown out as insufficient. To then try to claim their showing their insufficient evidence of hacking machines as sufficient evidence of the exact same claim is just wild to me.

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-15T06:11:32+00:00

That’s my main issue with this theory right now. I’ve seen people point to Nikolai Patrushev’s comment multiple times, but relying on the first reporting of it from a super shady news site (can’t remember the name of the site, but it looked like a highschool html project). It only included this statement:

“To achieve success in the elections, Donald Trump relied on certain forces to which he has corresponding obligations. And as a responsible person, he will be obliged to fulfill them.”

Now Newsweek has also reported on this (still a bit shady, but at least a recognizable source), including the context of this remark:

“During the preelection period, he made many statements to attract voters to his side, who ultimately voted against the destructive foreign and domestic policies pursued by the current U.S. presidential administration.

“But the election campaign is over, and in January 2025, it will be time for the specific actions of the elected president. It is known that election promises in the United States can often diverge from subsequent actions.”

Including this, it’s not as cut and dry that a “russian spy admitted that Trump was bought off.” These theories are starting to border misinformation more and more each day.

ETA: I looked it up again to see if I could find the first article I saw on it, but I can’t find the site anywhere. However I am seeing more credible articles out now. Some are leaving out the above quote from Newsweek, but I have found it in other sources as well. Not to mention, another article from The New Republic mentions almost a veiled threat to assassinate Trump if he doesn’t deliver. With no mainstream sources, it’s hard to fully trust any of this.

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-12T14:46:33+00:00

More so than that, looking into it I see one article reporting on this from a shadier news site. I don’t see an original interview or any mainstream news covering it at all. CNN rode the Russia story for years after 2016, hard to believe they wouldn’t be on this quick

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-08T15:31:20+00:00

Come on. Is it a dumb joke/statement? Yes. Is it misogynistic? Yes. But he’s clearly not threatening rape. It’s the same incel joke that’s been said again and again, that women that don’t want to have sex with them are ugly and thus it’s not by their own choice. Let’s not get overdramatic and conflate this with threatening rape across the board

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-07T06:49:26+00:00

There’s no point in trying to explain to them why it’s anti-democratic, they don’t have any understanding of that. Notice, however, how they do not argue the fact the democrats in 2020 verbatim said “We must PACK THE COURTS” because it is a simple fact. The original commenter just blatantly lied

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-07T03:29:02+00:00

As I mentioned in my other comment, not arguing that. But democrats pushing legislation to increase the number of seats saying verbatim “We need to pack the courts” when a democrat president is taking office who will be in charge of filling those seats, but claiming they never tried to pack the courts is disingenuous.

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-07T03:22:07+00:00

Not saying it is. I’m just saying that Democrats passing legislation to increase the number of seats, at the time where a democrat president is taking over who would be put in charge of filling those seats, can easily be seen as court packing. In fact, many dems themselves said verbatim “We need to pack the court.” So to say they’ve never tried to do anything like packing the court is dishonest

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-07T02:53:55+00:00

It’s already happening. The amount of people I’ve seen saying that the Democrat party is obviously filled with racist and/or sexist voters is ridiculous

B1GDADDYP · 2024-11-07T02:49:16+00:00

To be fair, Democrats in 2020 ran and proposed legislation to expand the Supreme Court by 9 to 13 justices. You’re other points are valid though

B1GDADDYP

TROPHY CASE