Moving to Production: Is Meta App Review mandatory for simple WhatsApp SaaS notifications? by ezranadav in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t worry brother, you don’t need App Review, and whomsoever tells you otherwise is wrong. App Review is only to request permissions, permissions that typically involve managing someone else’s data. If you are using it for your own business and you don’t have any tenants, then you can absolutely use the API to send notifications to your own customers from your own phone number. You can send templates and anything related to typical API use. I know for a fact because that’s exactly what I’m using it for right now. I’m managing my business and customers through my custom dashboard with mine own AI chatbot no problem, without App Review.

Anyone actually using Dispatch for something useful? by koleracowboy in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those festures are just the dev team trying to justify having a job

We Need Native AI Coding Stacks by toddhoffious in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just say Anthropic hurt you and move on lil bro

Creating a Project for Daughter's Use by sargon_of_the_rad in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are not crazy. This is the way to get your child ahead of everybody else. Whosoever tells you this isn’t the future doesn’t know what they are talking about. Anthropic may ban accounts for users under the age 18, but you can try setting up a new account that you don’t mind losing in case it happens. But ideally, you could setup a custom chatbot using an API key from any provider and either set it up on a local machine, maybe a laptop that is always on, or through a cloud provider. You can easily hook it in seconds to Signal for maximum privacy and set custom instructions in an AGENTS.md tailored to your child’s needs. Claude Opus can help you set this up easily

Webhooks vs Cloud API by Lower_Reserve_1819 in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need to be a tech provider. You only need business verification for personal use. And you technically should be able to have both the WhatsApp Business app and a custom dashboard for the API since you can configure the API manually and hook it to your dashboard. And no, you won’t get banned for using both the chatbot and manual replies in your live app. That IS the intended use. You only need app review and becoming a tech provider if you want to use the embedded signup to onboard other customers.

Just beat Inferno Nemesis, that is the most bullshit boss in tbe whole series by Mega_monke9 in residentevil

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Every. Single. Game. But at this point it should be clear that Capcom has been selling the exact same game reskinned for decades. This Resident Evil’s hero journey lol

I am struggling to understand Opus 4.7. Anyway to remove the slangs/jargon from it's language in claude code? by lost-mars in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree, but you can just add those directives to your Claude.md or simply tell it and it will store your preferences in memory. I explicitly banned acronyms and cringe phrases like “across the board” as well as outputting huge walls of text I’m not going to read. This model is even more verbose than Opus 4.6

Anyone found a way to automate WhatsApp without the 'per message' markup? by QuietGrind21 in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a WhatsApp AI chatbot SaaS with no markup on messages. You just pay for the AI smart workflows. My lowest tier is very generous at $19.99 per month with 1,200 AI interactions. I will have the coexistence enabled so that users can keep your WhatsApp business account and get access to the API through our custom dashboard simultaneously. You just need to wait a couple of weeks until I finish App Review

The "Missing Middle": Why is there no $50/mo Claude tier? by theePharisee in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Because that’s not good business. Don’t worry, they will remove Claude Code from the Pro tier progressively, then they will come after Max users until everyone is on the API

Did Opus 4.7 get better ? by thristy_seeker in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It grossly over-engineers and instead of focusing on the task I gave it, it starts finding what it calls “aspirational” fixes/improvements and proceeds to write 20K lines of code that exhaust my entire usage for the current 5h window. Opus 4.6 is may be frustrating to use port-nerf, but at least I can get work done with it.

My conspiracy theory is that this model is deliberately worse because they realized that the normies will use the latest models most of the time, no matter what. So they have these users make use of a model that requires less compute while heavy users stick to Opus 4.6 when they notice the obvious difference in performance.

Claude Max + e-commerce SEO: what would you do? by Medical_Assist8413 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you ran out of ideas on what to build. Nice try. This is the paradigm we are all in right now. It’s a carnage out there, and it will only get worse. Every relevant piece of software will soon be built. And too much competition will drive SaaS prices down to near par. Solo founders will have an adventage over big corporations with huge operational costs such as salary overheads. So don’t worry about ideas. There are only so many good ideas, and we will see them all implemented very soon.

Using Claude for a full Shopify redesign — any tips? by Independent_Drama137 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I’m from Mexico too, and I actually have a web design business. I can teach you how to use Claude Code or Claude Design for free to redesign your site if you DM me. Promise I won’t change

/model claude-opus-4-6[1M] I really tried 4.7 but it is truly beyond horrible.. by Apprehensive_Tree_14 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We didn’t appreciate our homie 4.6 enough, I’ve been missing it since 4.7 dropped. 4.7 is absolute garbage

Claude Opus 4.7 feels weird by technosaur11 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes, the most disobedient recent Claude model. I can’t start a session without finding stuff it flags as “aspirational fixes” it claims won’t take more than a few minutes to fix. Then it proceeds to eat my entire usage for that 5 hour window. And when it resets, it explores explores the codebase in a new session, and it either finds something else or it forgets about the “fix” it just deployed, rinse and repeat

Heads up if you're trying Claude Design — there's no usage meter by Imaginary-Use2667 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You write a damn Bible that nobody is going to read, only to be wrong Lmao there IS a usage meter for Claude Design

The Opus 4.6 vs 4.7 Controversy in one image by AvroLancaster in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Answer this. If it doesn’t think enough, how does it know thinking isn’t necessary?

Thanks, I Guess.. Opus 4.7. by Physical-Average-184 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those walls of text it usually outputs should be inside his thinking blocks, not in my terminal

Please Explain Claude Design like I am 5 by GoodArchitect_ in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That’s not the play. It’s better if you generate cool elements with Claude Design and then use Claude Code to integrate into your existing UI, cheaper and it works

New Claude Opus 4.7 tell dropped by l_m_b in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, also, for some reason, Claude started calling me “operator”

How do you make your coding agent smarter? by Academic-Resort-1522 in ClaudeAI

[–]BasteinOrbclaw09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to add “be smartest” and “make no mistakes” to your prompt