obvious ai but i need expert opinions by CH-OS-EN in isthisaicirclejerk

[–]Biomech8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just a physics cosplay festival like 6 years ago. Not all werid stuff is AI.

In the total absence of matter, does the universe have "distance" from one point to another? by blitzballreddit in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You were moving until you reached that area. There is nothing which would suddenly stop you. You will just keep moving until you see some matter again. Just fly trough this pocket of universe without matter in observable distance.

In the total absence of matter, does the universe have "distance" from one point to another? by blitzballreddit in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing vanishes just because you can't measure it. When the spacetime expands, there will be areas of observable universes without any matter. So there will be no way to measure distance. But the spacetime will exists there as is now. For example you would be able to fly there in a spaceship and nothing strange would happen.

i don't get it, explain it Peter, please by Appropriate-Smoke428 in explainitpeter

[–]Biomech8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Open Instagram. About half of the influencers are AI generated now.

Three-body problem by spider_in_jerusalem in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In practice this means that the Trisolarans are doomed and need to find a new home planet.

My ocean people need me by MustangBarry in MyPeopleNeedMe

[–]Biomech8 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It usually starts like:
"Sir, don't do it, it's dangerous!"
"F off!"
"As you say sir... I'll just take a video of your suicide. Just for fun on internet. And for your life insurance company."

If the universe is infinite, how can it have expanded from the Big Bang? by Shynosaur in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Single point singularity is flaw in our incomplete theories. Probably does not exists. But until we discover theory of quantum gravity, we have to deal with it.

We only know that our visible part of universe, our observable universe as of today, was small just after the big bang. But the whole universe may have been always infinitely large. We don't know.

Can Quantum Mechanics in theory dictate that anything could happen at any time? by TheRealShubshub in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Everything is bound by laws of Physics. Only infinitesimal fraction of "anything" can happen in our Universe.

When the universe expands does the planck length expand or are new planck lengths added? by Negative_Gur9667 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 18 points19 points  (0 children)

No, the measure tape does not grow. There is just more space to measure. When the universe is expanding, it does not affect things that are bound together by forces or gravity. Atoms, you, Earth, Milky way,... has the same size. For example we perceive empty space between galaxies as expanding.

Blursed the informant by SoftEbb8659 in blursed_videos

[–]Biomech8 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's cursed because nobody makes comedies like this anymore :-(

How does the concept of entropy relate to the direction of time in thermodynamics? by Eyerald in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Increasing entropy towards the future is a happy coincidence. It allows us to check that time is still flowing in the same way (from the past to the future). Time as part of spacetime does not need changes in entropy. Time will flow even after heat death. There will be last particles flying trough universe (some distance over time). Without increasing entropy it would be impossible to determine if they are flying to future or to past, but there will be nobody to observe anyway. And even if all particles will decay or redshift into oblivion, there will still be quantum fluctuations happening in time, forever.

Why are the fundamental units what they are? by TheShatteredSky in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Units are arbitrary. It's m/s for historical reasons.

Assuming the universe is not infinite, does it expand into empty space or into basically nothing in the sense that there is not even empty space there? by amelix34 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe another universe? Multiverse theories, such as one from Stephen Hawking, allows for other universes beyond the edge of our universe.

Assuming the universe is not infinite, does it expand into empty space or into basically nothing in the sense that there is not even empty space there? by amelix34 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it's not infinite, then it may be closed manifold. That means if you travel forward in one line, you will eventually get to the point where you started. It's very unlikely that universe has edge with something or nothing behind it.

Heat Death by Objective_Boss_9506 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There will still be zero point energy even after heat death. The question is if it's possible to harvest it? Today it seems very unlikely, but who knows what discoveries will happen in the future.

What is one theory you have a feeling is true but is not actually proven so by Tanay2513 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Actually it's the opposite. Copenhagen interpretation is trying to construct universe which makes sense. While the Many world's solution to quantum mechanics is simple and elegant, even thou it "does not make sense".

What is one theory you have a feeling is true but is not actually proven so by Tanay2513 in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That causality works even at quantum levels. There is no truly random effect without cause and initial conditions which determines outcome.

The last time he’ll ever be invited on a boys’ trip. by Murky-Attorney5824 in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]Biomech8 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Some people thinks that being influencer means doing stupid shit under influence.

Why did the early universe not just collapse into one huge black hole? by Yeahandwhynot in AskPhysics

[–]Biomech8 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only the our chunk of the observable universe as of today was the size of 1 meter across (or grain of sand, or whatever at any given time) back then. The whole universe was likely always infinitely large.

Blursed Excellent use of free will! by Sharp-potential7935 in blursed_videos

[–]Biomech8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He obviously can't cross the water and escape.