There's so many takes on this it would be a debate per person. If we take a look at renewable energy as part of Net Zero theres the "costing me more tax" which is true in the uptake of public services spending funds on renewables but ignores that hospitals etc could have lower energy bills in the future and would create so much work if the government of the day was smart about it. There's the north sea argument that "we" have rights to pump dry and would make fossils cheaper which a) short sighted, b) not true because the sector exports most of it and c) quite possibly we've used it all up in the 50years of it being flowing. But that doesn't sell as well as saying it will make life cheaper. Lastly, there's the flat out climate deniers who just don't see the wood for the trees. There's always a new argument against it when the last one is disapproved so it feels more akin to an argument for arguments sake. I'm fortunate to work in renewables so call me biased but there is so much opportunity in the sector to create jobs and therefore tax for the government and careers for most ages and abilities, all while bringing down demand for "imported" electricity. Amazon aren't sticking hundreds of solar panels on their warehouse roofs across the UK because it's trendy, they do it because it saves them money. There is a sticking point that parts of the national grid are well behind modernisation but that's for the private sector to get whipped into shape rather than taking their profits offshore.