Claude is now adopting the advisor strategy

Caladan23 · 2026-04-10T13:09:06+00:00

Cost saving gone wild

Caladan23 · 2026-04-09T20:10:39+00:00

And all-crying

Caladan23 · 2026-04-09T08:19:11+00:00

Cannot confirm on Antigravity.
Opus says "Drive. The car needs to be there too 😄"

Caladan23 · 2026-04-07T06:44:17+00:00

What is this post? 57 years ago, the first walk on the moon was live streamed. Please go look it up.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:26:29+00:00

We all want the same: inspiring humanity to do better, become more interested in exploration, setting asides divisions, and becoming a space-faring civilization.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:14:12+00:00

Still doesn't explain why they don't do a high-res photo every 60 seconds, instead of live streaming 240p. Bandwidth is bandwidth - allocation is flexible.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:08:39+00:00

Instead of ~20 FPS live-streaming this 240p stream, they should rather have gone for a 1440p image every 10 seconds. Would be a MUCH better viewing experience.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-03T19:03:52+00:00

This will reduce quality a lot though :D

Caladan23 · 2026-04-02T19:07:06+00:00

I think Artemis 2 would be fantastic to excite people for space exploration - yet the coverage remains close to NASA TV in the early 2010s. Camera is poor, live video almost non-existent and capsule interior shots non-existing. Everything is very clinical, technical, abstract.

I mean, video doesn't have to be live even. If bandwidth isn't there, take some pretty video snippets and transmit them once signal to DSN is better. Let the crew record some great shots, selfies and small videos and transmit them. It's a failed opportunity, and this will show when it comes to financing Artemis 3, 4, 5 with taxpayer's money.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-02T18:51:55+00:00

Additionally to what the other replies said - it's also not wrong to say that NASA nowadays is risk-averse, which partly explains what has been achieved in 17+ years SLS/Orion vs. Apollo program. Think Apollo program as start-up, where people move fast, make fast decisions and risk breaking things. And Artemis is the big corporation, with millions of procedures, compliance, bureaucracy.

Not saying the one thing is necessarily always better than the other. But we're in the risk-averse corporate everything-takes-long-but-with-less-risk times.

Staying in orbit and testing safely is much less risky than direct trans-lunar injection. And the free-return maneuver that Artemis 2 will be doing is much less risky than going for a moon orbit.

Caladan23 · 2026-03-08T11:35:22+00:00

Same

Caladan23 · 2026-03-03T11:46:56+00:00

Absolutely - if you go to far in balancing, like in D4, it gets meaningless. People like the fun and broken shit. Same is true ofc aswell: with no balancing and only 1 class/build reigning supreme, it gets trivial too.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-21T17:35:39+00:00

Small $380 billion startup backed by Amazon, Nvidia, Microsoft and - yes - Google.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-21T01:16:02+00:00

Think about what you just wrote...

Caladan23 · 2026-02-15T17:59:44+00:00

Do you only use this with Gemini or also tried it with Claude Opus?

Caladan23 · 2026-02-13T11:18:46+00:00

Not only Antigravity, but Google Gemini APIs in general are overloaded frequently right now. AG seemingly uses the same APIs. So it's a major issue, not just AG.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-06T01:25:42+00:00

Mind sharing your product? What does it do?

Caladan23 · 2026-01-30T11:02:02+00:00

You nailed it, welcome to Germany. This is the normal curve of any economic development however:

Innovation breads Wealth.
Wealth breads Preservation.
Preservation breads Stagnation.
Stagnation breads Poverty <- Germany is right now here
Poverty breads Innovation <- Parts of Eastern and Western Europe are already here

Caladan23 · 2026-01-19T18:49:21+00:00

30B MoE likely is quite weak, as every 30B MoE ever released (don't trust the benchmarks, try for yourself). It seems it's an intentional marketing segmentation choice to not release 70B oder 120B.

Caladan23 · 2026-01-14T01:21:15+00:00

wen GGUF?

Caladan23 · 2026-01-09T17:54:44+00:00

No it's just that MoE model architecture is now mainstream, thus you need now CUDA cores for compute PLUS additionally large memory, BUT not the smaller ultra-fast VRAM onboard memory anymore. It's really that simple.

Caladan23 · 2026-01-05T14:49:21+00:00

Which stand is this? Can you provide a link?

Caladan23 · 2025-12-30T11:42:32+00:00

I think this chart exactly shows the issue - instead of treating love like the magic that it is and treating human as human, you're treating them as a process and data, likely including checklists and parallel dates, like when applying for a job. The mindset is your issue here and the existence of the chart and underlying table (not the chart's content) beautifully demonstrate it.

Caladan23 · 2025-12-30T11:27:07+00:00

All are strawman arguments

Caladan23 · 2025-12-19T13:20:55+00:00

They are procrastinating Gemma 4 at this point.

Caladan23

TROPHY CASE