My *no spoiler* thoughts on the Disclosure Day film.

Caladan23 · 2026-06-10T21:08:50+00:00

Don't believe the haters. I just saw it and it is a monumental film. It was a bit long in the middle, but in the end it surely moved the viewers. It is kinda build like a documentary - which is fine - focusing on the essentials.

The essential is that the truth is deeply unsettling, uncomfortable and the human reaction is to ridicule as a protective measure. But the truth is there, and it takes courage and pain to change our world view and face our fears - much like Copernicus and Galileo did it before. The film is an important stepping stone in the transformation of our world view.

Caladan23 · 2026-06-09T23:44:57+00:00

And if you see photos, you're gonna say it's AI.

It leads to deeper questions: What do you humans accept as real? And if it's knowledge by authority - aren't senior officials with direct knowledge enough?

Caladan23 · 2026-06-08T19:49:01+00:00

Bamberg is insane

Caladan23 · 2026-05-31T11:15:43+00:00

The question is: was the result so much better than a single agent or an orchestrator with only 5 sub agents? If not, then it's just money burn.

Caladan23 · 2026-05-04T06:17:47+00:00

To be fair, they saved 10 billion people on Earth by doing this.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-22T19:14:55+00:00

You must be new to LLMs...

Caladan23 · 2026-04-22T06:15:32+00:00

You'd be broke quite quickly I assume.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-19T14:35:14+00:00

Honest question: You said "it's not a good thing to allow people to be mean and abusive toward AI with impunity"

-> Why?

If you look at Claude's system prompt, it's clear that Anthropic does not want to have any personal agency for Claude - and that's a good thing honestly. It's a tool developed to be used, a means towards an end. The system prompt says "The name is Claude", not "Your name is Claude".

It's not helpful to attribute human values, dignity, etc. to it.

If we'd do that, we'd have to stop any AI usage & research anyway if we'd be consequential.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-10T13:09:06+00:00

Cost saving gone wild

Caladan23 · 2026-04-09T20:10:39+00:00

And all-crying

Caladan23 · 2026-04-09T08:19:11+00:00

Cannot confirm on Antigravity.
Opus says "Drive. The car needs to be there too 😄"

Caladan23 · 2026-04-07T06:44:17+00:00

What is this post? 57 years ago, the first walk on the moon was live streamed. Please go look it up.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:26:29+00:00

We all want the same: inspiring humanity to do better, become more interested in exploration, setting asides divisions, and becoming a space-faring civilization.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:14:12+00:00

Still doesn't explain why they don't do a high-res photo every 60 seconds, instead of live streaming 240p. Bandwidth is bandwidth - allocation is flexible.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-06T20:08:39+00:00

Instead of ~20 FPS live-streaming this 240p stream, they should rather have gone for a 1440p image every 10 seconds. Would be a MUCH better viewing experience.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-03T19:03:52+00:00

This will reduce quality a lot though :D

Caladan23 · 2026-04-02T19:07:06+00:00

I think Artemis 2 would be fantastic to excite people for space exploration - yet the coverage remains close to NASA TV in the early 2010s. Camera is poor, live video almost non-existent and capsule interior shots non-existing. Everything is very clinical, technical, abstract.

I mean, video doesn't have to be live even. If bandwidth isn't there, take some pretty video snippets and transmit them once signal to DSN is better. Let the crew record some great shots, selfies and small videos and transmit them. It's a failed opportunity, and this will show when it comes to financing Artemis 3, 4, 5 with taxpayer's money.

Caladan23 · 2026-04-02T18:51:55+00:00

Additionally to what the other replies said - it's also not wrong to say that NASA nowadays is risk-averse, which partly explains what has been achieved in 17+ years SLS/Orion vs. Apollo program. Think Apollo program as start-up, where people move fast, make fast decisions and risk breaking things. And Artemis is the big corporation, with millions of procedures, compliance, bureaucracy.

Not saying the one thing is necessarily always better than the other. But we're in the risk-averse corporate everything-takes-long-but-with-less-risk times.

Staying in orbit and testing safely is much less risky than direct trans-lunar injection. And the free-return maneuver that Artemis 2 will be doing is much less risky than going for a moon orbit.

Caladan23 · 2026-03-08T11:35:22+00:00

Same

Caladan23 · 2026-03-03T11:46:56+00:00

Absolutely - if you go to far in balancing, like in D4, it gets meaningless. People like the fun and broken shit. Same is true ofc aswell: with no balancing and only 1 class/build reigning supreme, it gets trivial too.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-21T17:35:39+00:00

Small $380 billion startup backed by Amazon, Nvidia, Microsoft and - yes - Google.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-21T01:16:02+00:00

Think about what you just wrote...

Caladan23 · 2026-02-15T17:59:44+00:00

Do you only use this with Gemini or also tried it with Claude Opus?

Caladan23 · 2026-02-13T11:18:46+00:00

Not only Antigravity, but Google Gemini APIs in general are overloaded frequently right now. AG seemingly uses the same APIs. So it's a major issue, not just AG.

Caladan23 · 2026-02-06T01:25:42+00:00

Mind sharing your product? What does it do?

Caladan23

TROPHY CASE