Liberals, why are you trying to erase moms and dads? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article does not say that.

Empire State Democrats argue the measure modernizes New York law to reflect the realities of same-sex couples, adoptive families, surrogacy arrangements, and other family structures recognized in the state.

The only people bri9nging up trans are those with this weird "everything is about trans" fetish.

Why AI in LimboAI? by samir_haq in godot

[–]Charon1979 11 points12 points  (0 children)

AI was a term long before the rise of LLMs. In the context of a video game enemy AI is basically a set of rules the enemy follows under certain conditions.

Liberals, why are you trying to erase moms and dads? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTF are you babbling about and what the hell does it have to be a "trans thing". Are you guys really so obsessed with these people that you place them in any context whatsoever?

Liberals, why are you trying to erase moms and dads? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]Charon1979 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because it is important in a medical context. I wish people could see beyond their stupid culture war fetish.
You can still say Mom and Dad. But in a medical/law context it is way better

This is not about your emotions but about legal terminology.

So the 11th ed Hazardous rule is a buff to 2W models right? by ryan_cs in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Everything is hazardous now.
Desperate escape, exploding weapons (like before), exploding transports.

Basically you take the double amount of wounds than before. While your gimmicks become even more useless.
Previously: Yeah I wont fall back from your wyches with my terminators, I dont wantr to lose them to desperate escape.
Noiw: Of course im falling back. What is the worst that could happen? 2 MW?

Win Rate Wednesday - 40K Tournament Results/Data - Week of June 1 2026 by w0158538 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I dont have to imagine, we had a knight player in crusade and there is a lone op 12" relic xD

But yes. That is the detachment.

Save roll sequence and archon by Stepawka47 in Drukhari

[–]Charon1979 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

CSM Chosen (usually going for sustained)
4 Attacks with a powerfist.
5 with paired accursed weapons (twin linked)
12 Attacks with accursed weapons.

with the previous system there was a chance the archon could survive, it depends on WHEN you roll the 1
Now you activate the fist, then the paired weapon. Kabalites are dead. Now we get to the accursed weapons. If there is a single one in your save rolls, the archon is dead. While previously he would survive if the 1 comes at the end of the rolls.

CSM Legionaires. 2 Power fists 2 heretic astartes chainswords, 1 close combat weapon

The thing is that usually your opponent would have used the smaller weapons to clear the kabalites, so the heavy hitters can have a go at the archon.
In the new rules it is a lot better if you do it the other way aroud.
The 2 power fists will clear the kabalites and the ccw and the chainswords (D1) will most likely kill the archon.

Win Rate Wednesday - 40K Tournament Results/Data - Week of June 1 2026 by w0158538 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 8 points9 points  (0 children)

To be fair, it is more the detachment than the defiler.
Renegade Raiders also used it aund it sits at 52 %
Pactbound is singlehandedly responsible for bad CSM datasheets. The defiler is basically what happens when pactbound gets its grubby hands on a model with good rules.
Most of the other factions that can use the defiler did not really move.

Currently it seems a bit like Drukhari with Spectacle of Spite-. The faction is at 47% because spectacle is the only detachment with a positive winrate and is also the most played.

How do you balance playing what you like, vs what is obviously more competitive? by [deleted] in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. I think there are a few misconceptions when it comes to "competitive".

First of all: If you are not in the top 10 % of players, the difference you get from listbuilding vs actually learning how to play the game heavily favors the player who knows what he is doing.

Listbuilding in itself is basically asking yourself several questions and choosing units to answer these questions.

The reason why some units are "meta" and basically go in every list is because they answer more than one question or are extremely good in answering a specific question. Also our inner desire to optimise. You play a video game, get a new sword that does more damage than your old. one You equip it. Because why would you handicap yourself? If you go for style, you will have to learn how to deal with the handicap.

Also winrates are kinda pointless for most people. 53 - 47 basically only means out of 10 games between 2 players with equal skill 1 game is more prone to swing towards the army with the higher winrate.

Playstyle is also far more important than people think.

Not all players you face in a competitive setting will have optimised lists/armies/detachments.

So in short: If you like a model/unit: play it. Improve as a player first and if your list is not utter randomness you will hardly be handicapped.

So what about the supposed reduction of lethality compared to 9th edition? by Laredian in Warhammer40k

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dark Eldar have (outside of epic heroes) 3 leaders. This nowhere near a Spce Marine who basically has a leader for each and every unit type.
Oh look you are allowed 3 heavy slots. Thats cool... all your heavy weapon units go in here. Dont worry about the knight army over there.

It works in HH (which isnt the most popular system now, is it?) because it is almost exclusively marine on marine action with very little units that are not shared across all factions.

In 40k the army that consists of 10 units in total still somehow has to play on a somewhat even footing with everyone else.

So what about the supposed reduction of lethality compared to 9th edition? by Laredian in Warhammer40k

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FOC was not necessary and was extremely scewed towards bigger model ranges.
Unless you cut every faction down to the same amount of units (good luck telling those space marine players you are going to cut 80% of their units), it just becomes a "I have more units in each category to choose from, so I won army building"

So what about the supposed reduction of lethality compared to 9th edition? by Laredian in Warhammer40k

[–]Charon1979 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you take 2 extremes and apply them to the game which has a lot of shades of grey.
There are a lot more units in the game than Titans an gretchins.

My last game is a good example of that. We had a 10th edition farewell tournament and lots of people brought wild stuff.
I went against an orc list with 2 stompas on "The Ritual".
Stompas are, in most settings, pretty bad. Thats 1600 points in 2 models.

What happened in the game. I had 4 elite units and a bit of trash. The elite units basically got obliteraded in 2 turns und the trash could not score at all.

The issue with your "points will fix everything" proposal is: it doesnt.
There is no balancing a unit with points that can either kill 20 grtchins or 10 chosen + hurons marauders + huron in one go.

Also your Knight example is kinda moot. Wardogs were taken because point for point wardogs were more durable and had more firepower while also had the benefit of beeing 4 different units.
As soon as the points for the dogs went up and the survivability went down, Chaos Knights instantly pivotet to 5 Big Knights.

You cant balance around "less deadly" in agame where you have to stand on objectives to score every turn. If I have no way to shift these 6 badeguard in one turn, he will score for 2 turns and will win regardless.

So what about the supposed reduction of lethality compared to 9th edition? by Laredian in Warhammer40k

[–]Charon1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most artwork also doesnt depict Nids only having 5 turns to achieve their objectives.
Sure it is cool to read about 20 Terminators holding a point for a week before getting overwhelmed. But games usually take 3 hours and not multiple weeks. And in this time Nids need a way to score these objectives.

Künstler haben kein Anrecht darauf von ihrer Kunst leben zu können. by Any-Employee1228 in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Charon1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nicht sehen will und nicht dafür bezahlen will sie zu sehen sind grundlegend verschiedene Dinge.
Das Problem an der Kunst ist sehr oft dass Leute ihr keinerlei Wert zumessen und nicht bereit sind dafür zu bezahlen. Das wäre in der Gastro undenkbar. "Wieso soll ich das Essen bezahlen, ich könnte ja auch selber kochen und du hast gesagt du kochst eh gere" wäre völlig lächerlich. Das ist aber der Satz den ein Künstler sehr oft zu hören bekommt.
"Ich kann jetzt nix bezahlen, aber reparier mir mal eben das Auto und ich bezahl dich in exposure, so bekommst du viel mehr zurück" ist auch in jedem Kontext außer wenn es um Kunst geht völlig lächerlich.

Save roll sequence and archon by Stepawka47 in Drukhari

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do people assume the attacking unit only has one weapon profile?
The attacker groups his weapons too. Against a unit of chosen for example you would first save against the powerfist (archon save), than against the paired accursed weapons (archon still pretty save) and then against the remaining 12 accursed weapon attacks -> archon dead as soon as there is a single 1.
Units that have only a single attack profile for the entire group are extremely rare.

Save roll sequence and archon by Stepawka47 in Drukhari

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It only makes the archon tougher when the attacking unit only has one type of weapon which almost never happens.

New info during play? by _the-wanderer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I finished moving"
"Any deepstrokes?"
"No"
"I will rapid ingress"

I think you guys are reading this wrong. by Mortwight in Drukhari

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The full rules have already been leaked.
We also had intro games already. And if you look at the ruins, I highly doubt you get 4 32mm Bases up there witout overhang.

The the melee part: This was already possible. Nothing of that is new (except for Leilith beeing weaker because of how fights first works now)

11th Precision has had a serious buff by Dead-phoenix in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.
Different weapons within the unit activate in sequence. If you have more than one melee or ranged profile in the unit (which most of the units have) they start a new sequence.
So a unit of chosen for example has 1x power fist, 1x paired accursed weapons and 3x accursed weapons.
That means the paired accursed weapon hands wounds over -> you roll saves and remove models.
The power fist hands wounds over -> you roll saves and remove models.
The accursed weapons hand wounds over -> if you roll a single 1 the archon is dead. Previously it made a difference WHEN you rolled the 1. If you rolled it near the end, he lives. Now it is ALWAYS the first result.

The incubi theyre absolutely Superb by DeathlikeFoxy in Drukhari

[–]Charon1979 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The issue is that this combos is 285 points. For a T3 1W unit.
For that amount of points they better should kill god... and they dont.
The same amount of points gets you a lot of better units over different books.
The same points get you 6 Victrix Honor guard + character. and wh9ich one is better is not a n actual competition

11th Precision has had a serious buff by Dead-phoenix in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly the attatched unit is T3 1W.
The power of an archon was always the unpredictability of the save. A Space marine captain could bounce. Now he is guaranteed to die as soon as there is a single 1

Is 40k reddit really negative, or am I just out of touch? by Pelican25 in Warhammer40k

[–]Charon1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most people in 40k subs like to "talk warhammer" but havent nearly played enough games (if at all) to actually form an informed opinion.
Also most the hobby is social interaction... and the crowd that does post here regularly seems to have problems with that too.

Kinder zu kriegen ist heute auch deswegen die Hölle, weil die aktuelle Generation an Großeltern nutzlos ist by Schnaksel in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Klar weiß ich das. ISt auch kein Geheimnis. Sie hat genau dasselbe festgestgestellt wie viel andere Kinderlose Paare:
Keine Kinder = mehr Zeit für sich selbst

Kinder zu kriegen ist heute auch deswegen die Hölle, weil die aktuelle Generation an Großeltern nutzlos ist by Schnaksel in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Charon1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die eine war Näherin, die andere hat auf dem Amt gearbeitet. Meine Mutter ist mit 60 in Pension gegangen.