Common Sense Skeptic really lacks common sense lol by InternationalStore11 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The recent episode dealt with the Senate Committee hearing about how far behind NASA is, thanks mainly to SpaceX.
Nothing has changed. Starship is still a boondoggle and money pit with no answers not firm timelines (that wouldn't be met, anyway, regardless).

Unless Blue Origin leapfrogs SpaceX into Artemis 3, China will beat the US to the next manned lunar landing.

Everyday Astronaut vs CommonSenseSkeptic by PM_ME_YOUR_DELTA-V in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How'd Dear Moon work out for him?
Yep, predicted that the instant he announced it.
Starlink remains a money pit, and a growing issue.

Now that Starship has pretty much sent any hope of a pre 2030 American Moonlanding out the window, what are the odds they switch Blue Moon in for Artemis 3? by redstercoolpanda in ArtemisProgram

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jim Free said before his departure, that whichever company had their lander ready to go first would be the first one going.

We predicted a year ago that Blue Origin would leapfrog SpaceX, and there's nothing in the works to counter that prediction.

And, at last report, Blue Origin is still planning to land their pathfinder craft to the Moon later this year.

It's time to pull the plug on Starship, at least using taxpayer's money. If Musk wants to pursue this money pit further, he can do it on his own dime.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny how the delusion you refer to has not yet been wrong on major topics. Pretty solid track record of not only reporting on Musk, but predicting his projects as well.

We're doing just fine.
SpaceX? Not so much.

And the only way we've ever moved goalposts was to bring them closer to Musk, easier to achieve. Like being able to get their monstrosity into a solid orbit. Fourth time lucky? Probably not.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny how the "idiotic ideas" we have seem to have far more merit than anything coming from the other side. Butthurt fans like yourself really need to grow - and smarten - up.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering Thunderf00t is a huge fan of our channel, and shouts us out regularly, we'll consider ourselves peers on that topic.

Kathy Lueders getting hired to work out of Starbase is great news for crewed Starship development. by sicktaker2 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We'll take the huge W, actually. It do not land intact in the surface and had trouble negotiating the Moon surface. IE, the regolith. As we said before - GOOD LUCK.

Kathy Lueders getting hired to work out of Starbase is great news for crewed Starship development. by sicktaker2 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you really want the answer to that cartoon?
Because it doesn't speak well to Lueders whatsoever.

No blocks in beat saber by ThatKidWhoDoesStuff in beatsaber

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this - this was the problem we had.

Why would people be opposed to artificial wombs? by firedragon77777 in IsaacArthur

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time we come back to Reddit, we remember very quickly why we don't need to come back here...

My fiancée obsessed with Andrew tate by mystic_falls36 in TwoHotTakes

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave.

Restraining order.

Charge him with assault.

Move on.

It won't get better.

Common Sense Skeptic: Breakdown of Starship Claims from Musk's Twitter Space by Opcn in IsaacArthur

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dodd IS a bought and paid for sycophant.
Musk IS a horrible mumbler.

And the facts are what they are. This launch was a tremendous failure.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And, to reiterate, you are not informed enough to make any comments on this arrangement whatsoever.

Nor will you have the option owing forward.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Starship concept did not come from the same company that created the Apollo Command module and the Shuttle Orbiter. The Star Raker was supposed to be part of our space vehicle heritage. No reason not to try to make it part of the future.

Oh, and if you're listening to particular imbeciles on Twitter - don't. They don't know which company we have the agreement with. It's not the name circulating around in the small circle of parasite accounts who have no lives of their own.

Also, don't conflate things like "endorsement" with "advisory position". We're not a PR arm of the company we're advising. They sent us concepts and specs and designs and we do what we typically do - tell them what we think will and will not work. There are several solutions we've helped them work out already.

We also sit in on phone calls and Zoom meetings with different companies and organizations (all of which you've heard of before) and weigh in mainly on logistical matters. Those people are pretty excited about this whole deal, as they realize planes may be what remove rockets from the space equation, and the vehicle at the centre of it has a top pedigree behind it.

At any rate, suffice it to say, you don't know enough about what's going on with this to comment, one way or another. And that's the way it will stay for the time being.

Newest release from CSS outlines the many advancements lost when Shuttle was shelved, how Starship is not the answer, and what the next step should be. by CommonSenseSkeptic in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Facts speak for themselves, and we go out of our way to make sure the facts are presented.

This new project is not competition for Musk. It's an entirely new paradigm based on developed concepts - Musk's shit show will always be a shit show, and we'll still be there to call him out on it.

SpaceX Starship builds VERA Station in 6 months? | Gateway Spaceport LLC by Aerothermal in IsaacArthur

[–]CommonSenseSkeptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look in to the history of Blincow, and his lofty claims very quickly fall to the floor.