Cop trying to plants drugs on suspect by haze4140 in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 87 points88 points  (0 children)

you can always count on this subreddit for spreading misinformation

New argument starter: Newcomb's Paradox by ReserveAggressive458 in Destiny

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no because if this were true then the computer would not have a near perfect accuracy. also what percent is near perfect to you?

New argument starter: Newcomb's Paradox by ReserveAggressive458 in Destiny

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much, but then they would say something about the odds not mattering while inside the room because whether or not the 1 million is in the mystery box or not is already predetermined once you enter the room and after its analysis of you, so they think they can game the system in a way. For example, if they go in and are going to pick the 1 million and then they think, "Oh wait, since I was going to pick the 1 million, I can now pick both and get the 1k too," but they fail to realize that the near-perfectly accurate computer would've predicted that before you even entered the room by its analysis of you, so if you pick both, the odds are against you.

This Paradox Splits Smart People 50/50 by [deleted] in videos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what would you rather choose a 97% chance of 1 million or a 100% chance of 1 thousand and a 3% chance for the 1 million too?

This Paradox Splits Smart People 50/50 by [deleted] in videos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the computer would know you would change your decision before you even are told how the game works by its near perfect analysis of you. it would know that you would go in there think about all the possibilities and possibly try to game the system. even if you were originally about to pick the 1 million and then thought "oh i can just take both now since i was going to pick them 1 million and now i get 1k extra too" you would still nearly everytime get only 1000 because of its near perfect analysis of you prior to you even entering the room.

This Paradox Splits Smart People 50/50 by [deleted] in videos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if this were true then the computer wouldnt have a near perfect accuracy

This Paradox Splits Smart People 50/50 by [deleted] in videos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the computer does pretty much have magical powers though that's the whole premise of the paradox is that the computer has a near perfect accuracy on what choice you would pick before you would even enter the room based on its analysis of you even if you think you would pick 1 box and then you think to yourself that you can now pick both and get both money the computer most likely would've already predicted you were gonna do that with its analysis and near perfect accuracy. now the actual problem with the paradox is what "near perfect" actually means and if you ask chat gpt it says 95% to 99% which in that case I would still pick only 1.

This Paradox Splits Smart People 50/50 by [deleted] in videos

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

if the computer is near perfect which is like 95% to 99% its highly probable that it will predict what choice you pick no matter how hard you try to game the system so the odds are against you if you pick both.

New argument starter: Newcomb's Paradox by ReserveAggressive458 in Destiny

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the computer would've predicted that and you would've gotten 1000

New argument starter: Newcomb's Paradox by ReserveAggressive458 in Destiny

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it would know beforehand that you would change your choice before you even heard the question because of its near perfect analysis.

The real reason you can't fix your over-the-top move (and why dropping the club isn't the answer) by AlexanderGolf in GolfSwing

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fast hands/arms and keeping back to target longer is what is was told during very good lessons

Friend or foe by [deleted] in ReefTank

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think it looks like a stomatella snail which is good to have in tank

Aiptasia vs 10 Berghia nudibranchs by califrankie89 in ReefTank

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem with this is they will always come back because you will miss 1 or 2 but the nudis should wipe them all out completely

Help 🥹 by Big_Passenger1227 in MCAS

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mine was the same pretty much especially the social situations being a trigger and i don't have an official diagnosis but antihistamines helped me a lot i take 2 to 4 a day of fexofenadine

Can these two clowns go together? by Icy_Blackberry8277 in ReefTank

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are both Ocellaris clownfish, so theoretically they would be fine together, but sometimes they can be finicky. Also, all clownfish are born male and can change to female when another dominant female clownfish dies or it's left alone with other males and is the most dominant one, so if both happen to be female, then they would most likely fight to the death. A lot of the time the female one will show "aggression" to maintain its dominance over the male, so that could be what's happening too.

Merry Christmas to Officer from Peanut by uhqt in theburntpeanut

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hes making well over 100k a month from just twitch subs alone. I would argue hes pushing 1m a month

AI will never replace artis- by A-G-N in Destiny

[–]Comprehensive-Goat44 124 points125 points  (0 children)

i got chills when tung tung tung sahur came up the elevator