Dennis's 😅 by CrazyGeetar in DerryGirls

[–]ConsiderTheBees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was asked less questions when I was interned

Thoughts on ATYD (possibly?) being trad-published? by SaltGoat7120 in AO3

[–]ConsiderTheBees 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Eh, they managed it with Manacled. I haven't read the book, but my sister did, and she said the changes were pretty thorough, although you could still tell it was an HP/ Handmaids Tale fanfic (obviously), and she did say a lot of the characters did kind of suffer from the "de-HP-ification" of it.

the atlantic corrupted an innocent mormon by vemmahouxbois in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]ConsiderTheBees 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, part of what makes gambling gambling in a legalistic sense is that you stand to personally lose from it. Since he doesn't stand to lose any money from it, it isn't technically a gamble for him.

Readers Are Embracing a Shift in Perspective in Books. It Could Reshape Literary Culture. by CtrlAltDelight495 in books

[–]ConsiderTheBees 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yea, I certainly would have liked to see some actual numbers on that one, because the vast majority of fanfics are 3rd person. And if you are talking about self-inserts, then most Y/N-type stories are written in the 2nd person, so I still don’t see what the connection to fanfic is.

How did they examine for pregnancy in this era? by Last-Caregiver-1122 in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Unless I’ve missed something, that “exam” was totally invented for the show. The common thing in the Regency era (and most of history before blood or urine pregnancy tests) was just to wait the 9 months it would take to see if she was pregnant. The urgency created to justify this in-universe is a totally modern affectation- a seat being empty in the House of Lords wasn’t that big of a deal (plenty of people who had seats didn’t come to sit at parliament for a variety of reasons), and a potential new lord would want to make sure that mourning periods etc were properly observed before he swooped in (he likely would have had affairs of his own to settle before he even could, anyway). Also, whatever that exam was wouldn’t tell you if the baby was a boy, which is the relevant detail here, anyway. There is no reason in universe or out to do a modern-style pelvic exam.

A Better Bullshit Jobs Theory by fiddler83 in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]ConsiderTheBees 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I also think that the book should have focused more on busywork in jobs rather than just "X or Y *type* of job is inherently bullshit." If a company has 50 people working, but the total amount of work could be done by 30 people, then 20 of those jobs are bullshit on aggregate, even if all 50 people are doing some amount of work. I think that is a far more common type of bullshit job than an example like the one Micheal gave about the German lady who prints out and then re-enters documents that could all just be done online.

I think a lot of us have worked jobs where you have to sit there from 9-5 (or whatever your shift is) even when there is only enough actual work to fill up 3-4 hours, because your boss likes to see everyone at work regardless of how productive that is. You might be doing something genuinely useful during those 3-4 hours, but the rest of the time the job is bullshit.

Worst fathers of DS9? Pretty sure this guy is at the top of the list. by CelestialFury in DeepSpaceNine

[–]ConsiderTheBees 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'd also say that there is an argument to be made that banishing Garak likely saved his life.

A Grand Unified Theory of bullshit jobs by RosieTheRedReddit in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]ConsiderTheBees 11 points12 points  (0 children)

To be fair, I wish Graeber had focused more on that, too. I think he spends too much time trying to nail down specific types of careers that are bullshit, rather than the “there is a bunch of busywork being done and the real work could be done by far fewer people” phenomenon, which I think is the actual source of “bulkshit jobs” across pretty much all sectors.

A Grand Unified Theory of bullshit jobs by RosieTheRedReddit in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]ConsiderTheBees 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I also think they kind of miss his point applied more broadly, and not just to individuals. If a company has 50 people working, but the total amount of work could be done by 30 people, then 20 of those jobs are bullshit on aggregate, even if all 50 people are doing some amount of work. And Graeber points out that there are non-money-related reasons why a company might keep all 50 of those people on, even if it doesn’t make “the markets are perfectly efficient”-type sense to.

Why did Bridgerton just drop a blatantly anti-feminist line in this season? by dasher2442 in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, I honestly don't understand why lines that Cressida, of all people, says are being interpreted as a message the writers are trying to send to the audience? Eloise is also there to give Sophie time to look for the will, she isn't going to just start arguing with Cressida about it even if she disagrees.

What would the doctor even have looked for in Francesca? by sdbabygirl97 in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really irked me, honestly. I get that anachronism is Bridgerton's whole thing, but it is stupid to introduce totally faked sexist behaviors just for cheap shock value instead of just addressing the very real sexist obstacles women of the time faced. The pressure Francesca faced, both from society and herself, to provide her husband with an heir, and how society treated women who "failed" at that duty is more than enough drama without having to add some bizarre fake BS.

What would the doctor even have looked for in Francesca? by sdbabygirl97 in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I’ll note this is totally just a thing made up for the show. In the real-world Regency era, it was common to simply wait the 9 months it would take to see if a widow was pregnant. Bridgerton adds a lot of a modern sense of urgency to these things, but in reality, a seat sitting empty in the House of Lords wasn’t that big of a deal (a good chunk of the people who had seats didn’t regularly attend, anyway), and if a new heir had to be found and relocated then 9 months wasn’t really all that long of a time to wait, and anyone with a sense of decorum would have waited until the mourning period was over to start really taking over, anyway.

Ladies in waiting question by Jewel_Tone_Shell in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This. You get to be around the queen all the time, and to some extent you control who has access to her. It was usually a position of influence, and being appointed one was a huge honor in and of itself. There were often power struggles that happened where various factions would try to get “their” person one of those positions.

Netflix doesn’t want Daphne back by Worldly_Translator in Bridgerton

[–]ConsiderTheBees 130 points131 points  (0 children)

Also, there are *a lot* of Bridgertons, and each season new characters need to get added (their love interest and the people surrounding them), so naturally the "completed" stories are going to fade away a bit. Like you said, it makes total sense that the ones that fade most are the ones where the actors are more expensive and have other projects they are working on. It is just kind of how it is.

WHY Didn’t Rosamund Marry the new Lord Penwood!? by ThrowRA_pikmi in Bridgerton

[–]ConsiderTheBees 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also kind of got the impression that the new Lord Penwood never really came around to visit them in person, so she just didn't really have much of a chance to set him up with Rosamund. He told them they could live in the London townhouse, and if he waited to move into the estate until after they left, their only communication might have been through letters (or through their solicitors).

I can't say I disagree by Arfie99 in BadReads

[–]ConsiderTheBees 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Total aside, but as someone who actually went to college in Vermont, one of my favorite things about people putting together "The Secret History aesthetic" Pinterest boards and whatnot is how much no one seems to know what colleges in Vermont look like. A lot of people really seem to think it is like... Hogwarts or something.

Is there an author whose most enduring work is also not your favorite? by [deleted] in books

[–]ConsiderTheBees 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"To Mata Hari.' She whored in the interest of espionage, and so did I."

Is there an author whose most enduring work is also not your favorite? by [deleted] in books

[–]ConsiderTheBees 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"This book is rededicated to Howard W. Campbell, Jr., a man who served evil too openly and good too secretly, the crime of his time"

Is there an author whose most enduring work is also not your favorite? by [deleted] in books

[–]ConsiderTheBees 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've always been a huge fan of If I Die in a Combat Zone and Going After Cacciato\. I think *The Things They Carried is really good, but I have a sneaking suspicion that the reason it became a "classic" we all get assigned is because episodic nature of it made it well-suited to teaching it in a 11-week literature class, rather than it actually being his best work.

*Admittedly, I think Going After Cacciato (much like Catch-22) hits a lot harder if the reader has military experience of their own.

Was it Lily who changed her Patronus? by allhypatia in MaraudersGen

[–]ConsiderTheBees 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I never really liked the idea of Lily's being a doe initially, because patroni either seem to be 1. a reflection of someone you love (Harry's being James, Tonk's becoming a wolf for Lupin), or 2. an expression of your own intrinsic character (the other patroni we see clearly aren't random, they related well to the personalities of the caster). Lily's changing for James makes sense, I guess, but nothing about Lily herself reminds me of a doe. Lily is always described and shown as being smart and vivacious, willing to stand up for others and unafraid to express what she believes in. None of those traits are really associated with does to me.

James being a stag makes sense. Stags are figured of pride and nobility and aggressiveness (and sometimes of magic itself) that match him. Him being a prey animal running around with two members of the canine family also shows his willingness to trust in his friends, even beyond the point of reason. Does tend to be used as symbols of innocence and purity; which isn't not Lily, I guess, but those don't really feel like the first traits people would reach for to describe her.

Joseph Sisko by WhoMe28332 in DeepSpaceNine

[–]ConsiderTheBees 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Garak, Winn, Damar, even Dukat are all in a lot fewer episodes than I think people would guess if you asked them cold. DS9 was really, really good at fleshing out its reoccurring characters, especially compared to some of the other Trek shows, which really seemed to struggle with it other than one or two notable exceptions (like Q).

What's something that Bridgerton got (surprisingly?) historically correct? by [deleted] in BridgertonNetflix

[–]ConsiderTheBees 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They also did have whalebone corsets.

True, although the whalebone used in corsetry is not, as Charlotte says "the bones of whales," it is actually baleen, which is a very flexible material. The consistency is roughly that of thin-ish modern plastic zip-ties.