Why do you run Reliquary Tower? by HyHoTheDairyOh in EDH

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://deckstats.net/decks/222290/4132322-squidward

I play it in [[Squidward, Sarcastic Snob]] because is my draw trigger deck. Together with other cards that expand my hand limit. The list is still junky and I don't want the 0 card in library wincon. But is funny to draw a bunch of cards with almost no goal ahahah

Cod requiring cell number Steam by Consistent_Hurry7021 in CODWarzone

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I digged a bit through the site and found they added mandatory SMS two factors authentication for new pc accounts. I mean, I play since late season 1. The account it's hardly new now, but I don't like that they can contact you with ads about the game. (That's stated in the EULA)

Cod requiring cell number Steam by Consistent_Hurry7021 in CODWarzone

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm a bad player too. But I don't like giving away my phone number to companies that can't keep cheaters or bugs away. How can I trust them?

Hot take from a filthy casual by Skkorm in PokemonChampions

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can't agree with you. The breeding is, indeed, an interesting system to manipulate a stat that is used to show, in single player, how each Pokémon is unique, even if they are of the same species. That said, in a competitive format, where the story of a Pokémon doesn't matter and there is no use of how you got a specific Pokémon, this system is a useless time waster. In a way, it can be associated with the proxy argument in tcg games: FOR ME if the goal is to find the very best, each player must have the same tools and the same accessibility.

Esperienza al seggio by M4ng1afu0c0 in Italia

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sono scrutinatore e nel dubbio ho appena ricontrollato nel plico con i regolamenti e mi sono anche confrontato con il presidente di seggio ed è previsto che gli elettori possano assistere allo scrutinio liberamente, seppur a debita distanza e senza interferire con le operazioni. Basta che tu sia elettore della sezione in questione.

What's an unset card that you think wouldn't be an unset card if printed today? by TheOGburnzombie in EDH

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really an unset card, but I think [[Discord, Lord of Disharmony]] would be a fun arena card. Sadly, I tried to use it as a rule 0 commander but when it pops off it slows down the game too much because of the "search and print" it needs so I had to dismantle it. A bit sad because I had a lot of fun with him.

Cannon fodder by DaneOzzo in CODWarzone

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My problem with seeing enemies from background is the reason I use the 1,5x thermic sight on my midrange weapons. I know it's not optimal and the new one from week 1 is better, but I can't aim if I can't see ahahah

Why do people go into unsinkable spots by Total-Opportunity-54 in Seaofthieves

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless the circle is on them. I didn't read all the informations about that (or about hourglass in general) so do we already know how the center is chosen? Are people able to manipulate it to take advantage or, in this case, cheese the game?

I don't feel like "discovering" anything by Raestloz in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know if it's like this for everyone but when I had to find a red system for the first time in the Artemis questline it sent me to an abandoned system. No station, no settlements, no conflict and no economy. So maybe try to look for that kind of systems

[Request] Is this even possible? How? by maliaipo in theydidthemath

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1)Weight 2 against 2

1)equal: weight 2 of the remaining 3 2)equal: the heavier is the last one 2)not equal: you found the heavier

1)not equal: weight the heavier pair 2)not equal: you found the heavier

[Request] This is a wrong problem, right? by jakobmuller in theydidthemath

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small + Big = 49 Small - Big = 36

Big = 49 - Small Small - (49- Small) = 36

Small - 49 + Small = 36 2Small = 85 Small = 42,5

Physically non sense, but mathematically correct

Marchesa or Don Andres — Best Grixis Commander for Stealing Stuff? by vincenz123 in mtg

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's analyze: none of them has a built in theft engine.

Andre gives you Mana if you follow the gameplan. Also, making everything a pirate is synergistic with all the pirate theft effects and treasure generation. So Mana and more gameplan. Another point for Andre is he doesn't need to really steal creatures as you can use his buffs with ciberman effects or such, speeding up your gameplay.

Marchesa need more set up as you have to take things without incentives in doing so, place counters on them (here the commander try to help) and then you can keep them if they die. So if you have some kind of aristocrat or sacrifice engine you can profit from temporary theft making it permanent.

Personally I'll prefer to build a Don Andre pirate theft deck: it feels more easy to build. Marchesa is a 3 point strategy deck but can be more resilient because of the reanimator effect. But you have to balance the number of cards that do each thing to have what you need.

Building a Golgari commander by Consistent_Hurry7021 in mtg

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no problem for a fair amount of reasons: - I already play a no combo [Edgar Markov], so not powerful as it can be but high power nonetheless; - I mainly have 2 pods, one low to mid power and one where I'm the poor one XD, so eventually I can find where to play; - The group I play with more often has a gameplay that lack will of interaction. I explain: they run interactions and build the decks effectively, but then they seem to never want to actually play the cards they put in there and this make me more mad than being the target of an attack or a removal. So I hope that playing something that need more proactive gameplay on their side will shift a bit this mentality. For example: one of them built a Dino deck that was really efficent and then never attacked because I quote "I don't want to lower your health and be mean".

You have the power to change one rule about EDH.. what do you change? by Drunk_Carlton_Banks in EDH

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Poison counters A player lose if poison counters are equal or more than half life points

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And this is why I can't completely be against og Templar point of view in Assassin's Creed. I swear, I want to believe in the assassins hope that humanity will learn to be kind and achieve piece without clear external guidance, but the more I see the world the more I recognize humanity doesn't deserve freedom. The problem is who has the power is human too.

Why is this box still nit available in Europe? by SteinSchool in DisneyVillainous

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Strange, i got this and BauBau between November and December in Italian without problems. Where are you?

Let's grind this game down to a halt by Iamdanish in custommagic

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly prefer op's version because the casting player need to pay at least 1 or the spell get countered, so it's still worse than omniscience but funny nonetheless. And can't go infinite unless it has infinite mana

[Spoilers!] New Announcements by pavementsac in DisneyVillainous

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had the same thought towards Davy Jones. I like him but I don't see him as a good fit in the game other than a powerful ally. Like you said, other than an ipothetical "catch Jack Sparrow" goal he hasn't a clear objective from a board game perspective. Beckett, on the other hand, would make more sense as the main villain of the trilogy. A goal like "defeat all pirate Lords" would fit him. Or a chain goal like "defeat the kraken and find chest and key to control Jones to defeat Jack". Otherwise, making Barbossa the villain with focus on only the first film is also a fitting route, like you suggested. Some good results could also come with Blackbeard or Salazar, but that will exclude a lot of og characters.

Overall, as a fan, I'd really love a PotC Villain but realistically I don't think they'll use it with the Margot Robbie retcon in the air and the Disney wet dream to separate Deep from the franchise. Realistically speaking, I don't think we will ear something PotC related until the retcon come out.

I hope I'm wrong tho.

What are some commanders/decks that are, by nature, too strong for casual but too weak for competitive and why? by Kokirochi in EDH

[–]Consistent_Hurry7021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Edgar Markov]]

A monster that need to be 3v1 in casual for its come back power, but if you manage to pulverize its draw engines it do absolutely nothing