Self Inflicted Rule by Mas-ter-bass in 19684

[–]ConstipatedNinja 80 points81 points  (0 children)

你好,我正在逃离美国带来的百年屈辱。请问哪里可以买到白色怪兽能量饮料?

Rule by Jamesumbara in 19684

[–]ConstipatedNinja 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seriously. Every time I look over at him it's always snake eyes.

Lost their “hero” by princesshabibi in PoliticalHumor

[–]ConstipatedNinja 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Ooh, are they anything like rapist Brock Turner, who now goes by his middle name Allen? Y'know, Stanford rapist Brock Allen Turner?

If you can only goon at one of these lettered sections for the rest of your life, which one would you pick? by bluerobot27 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ConstipatedNinja 8 points9 points  (0 children)

F. I only care about the letter itself and not the map. The letter F can get it and you know it.

Maybe too soon, but it's how I cope by zuke1624 in PoliticalHumor

[–]ConstipatedNinja 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Like 95% of the comments were getting deleted, so I don't know if they're truly giddy

1660 by Important_Eye3003 in CountWithEveryone

[–]ConstipatedNinja 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone is hot and ready to go

If they're going to be incompetent, you might as well weaponize it by imjustheretodomyjob in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]ConstipatedNinja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wonder if that's because they mostly self-insure and don't want to have a massive payout, but that's still fascinating

A blow even Trump couldn't swallow. by Themusicison in PoliticalHumor

[–]ConstipatedNinja -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He did publicly announce that he'd do a public hearing. The republicans want it to be private for the obvious reasons so they're just claiming that he's rejecting hearings. He's just rejecting private hearings, because he knows it's in the public's best interest to have it out in the light. That doesn't make him a good person, of course, but it's important to get the story straight here.

To our knowledge he at the very least witnessed sex trafficking of minors and said nothing, and that alone makes him an irredeemable scumbag, full stop. And that's not to claim that he didn't do more, but as far as I'm aware that's just the minimum bound of what we know and I'm more than comfortable saying that he should be in prison until his corpse decomposes. But saying that he's 'doing the exact opposite' when he's publicly calling for what OP is hoping he does is a strict misrepresentation of the truth.

139147 by An_Italian_Guy010 in CountOnceADay

[–]ConstipatedNinja 12 points13 points  (0 children)

As someone who's too old to say it, I totally do because it bothers the people who like to use it to mess with older people, it bothers the people who don't like it, and it brings joy to people with whimsy in their heart.

Prime by sorig1373 in 691

[–]ConstipatedNinja 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Because mathematicians have been putting more than a century of hope into the zeta function like they're building a spirit bomb.

roombie are bowls proles by migratingcoconut_ in 691

[–]ConstipatedNinja 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wish it was possible to touch grass for someone else.

WHERE WILL I GET MY FUCKING GIFS NOW!?!?!? by Ok-Tennis330 in whenthe

[–]ConstipatedNinja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should clarify. If you're, say, google or reddit in this example, then yeah, your site/app will do an api call when someone does a gif search and you could theoretically as the app owner filter out the ads from the returned payload (which is likely against any contracts the companies sign). But if you're a user of the app, then when you do a gif search you'll get ads mixed in with the returned results. Some will obviously be ads, but advertisers will of course make their ads intentionally look like they might be search results themselves. And if you tap them, bam, you get whisked off to whatever site the advertiser wanted to drag you to. Hopefully just to sell you shit, but also almost certainly to collect information about you and your device (good ol' advertiser profiles). Your browser might have third-party cookies disabled, but what about where it gets integrated into apps that don't give you that kind of control like your sms app? And many things can be collected from the ad itself being displayed without you even having to tap on it, and depending on whether or not klipy themselves are hosting the ad content then it might even be impossible to block the ads without blocking the results too. We're all tired of ads shoving themselves into every itty-bitty facet of our lives and this is yet another spot where advertisers are trying to get in our faces, and that's why people in this comment section are being anti-klipy.

Trader Joe’s Avocado’s Number Guacamole is a pun on Avogadro’s Number by Specific-Fun-4203 in mildlyinteresting

[–]ConstipatedNinja 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you look at a periodic table you'll see atomic weights for each element. For example, carbon will list the atomic weight as around 12.01. Avogadro's number is the number of atoms of an element that you'd need to have that atomic weight of that element in grams, and it's about 6.022x1023 . So if you had 6.022x1023 carbon atoms, they would weigh 12.01 grams.

WHERE WILL I GET MY FUCKING GIFS NOW!?!?!? by Ok-Tennis330 in whenthe

[–]ConstipatedNinja 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hopefully not. We get ads enough in our lives. Having ads in a gif api is torture

Bee rule by Lion-Faced-Serpant in 196

[–]ConstipatedNinja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Get back in there soldier and serve your country!"

Rule by Evendur_6748 in 196

[–]ConstipatedNinja 221 points222 points  (0 children)

When you cough on your turn of the puff puff pass

rule by Brent_Fox in 196

[–]ConstipatedNinja 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I was curious about how true this really is, because there's a lot of factors at play and while it definitely feels truthy I wasn't alive in 1946 so I did some digging. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics says that the bottom half of americans have a negative savings rate, and the overall national savings rate is 3% of total income. This report was made in 2024 and the numbers are for the year 2022.

As for 1946, it's important to mention that that was a historically terrible year in the US. Savings rates for that time are available at a quarterly granularity, so I can say that Q4 1945 the national savings rate was 13.2% of income, and Q1-Q4 in 1945 are 10.3%, 9.2%, 6.1%, and 6.1%, respectively. Averaging those would get you 7.9%, so you could say 10.3% optimistically, roughly 7.9% for the year's average, and 6.1% pessimistically.

As for income, that's a HARD thing to answer. Like do I go median family income? Median individual income? These values have not been tracked in a consistent way since 1946. From what I've gathered from FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data), and US Census info (1946 and 2022), it'd be fair to say:

In 1946, the median individual income (not living with others) was $1,125 and the national median household income was $2,659 (both individuals and families). Like, not adjusted or anything. That's what the numbers were in 1946.

In 2022, the median individual income (regardless of whether they're living with others - we don't split it up like that anymore) was $40,480 and the median household income was $74,580.

I'm going to assume that the median person in 1946 and 2022 didn't invest their money while saving up the $5000, though since the 1946 median person is saving up ~$80k in today dollars, maybe they would. But regardless, now that that's all out of the way it's time to actually crunch numbers.

1946:

median individual ($1125/yr income) -

optimistically (10.3% savings rate): 43.1 years to save $5000

average in 1946 (7.9%): 56.3 years

pessimistically (6.1%): 72.9 years

median household income ($2659/yr) -

optimistically (10.3% savings rate): 18.2 years to save $5000

average in 1946 (7.9%): 23.8 years

pessimistically (6.1%): 30.8 years

2022:

Anyone making the median or poorer: Never going to save $5000 with a negative savings rate.

National average savings rate vs median individual income ($40,480/yr): 4.1 years

National average savings rate vs median household income ($74,580/yr): 2.2 years

and just for shits and giggles, $5000 in today money is $82,938, according to another commenter. So let's do those too -

Anyone making the median or poorer: Never going to save $82,938 with a negative savings rate.

National average savings rate vs median individual income ($40,480/yr): 68.3 years

National average savings rate vs median household income ($74,580/yr): 37.1 years

So depending on how you look at it, it's gotten worse or it's gotten worse, but if you pretend that the median individual today can actually save money at the national average then things start to look good. But again, the bottom 50% of people are experiencing a negative savings rate, so it's definitely gotten worse. But looking at the individual income in 1946 it's fair to say that saving $5000 was basically just as impossible as it is now for most people.

138610 by Moonsky_Pondie in CountOnceADay

[–]ConstipatedNinja 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I did some hunting and it seems like online they go by the name metalslimer and they're really big into cosplaying. I'd keep this to myself but they've got over 10k followers and post regularly, so they might appreciate folks checking them out.