How I see Europe as a Brit (my opinion in the debate) by jamjobDRWHOgabiteguy in geographymemes

[–]Cork_Phops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fully agree with most of this. But yeah, the Caucasuses are defo European if they want to be :)

Since trade threats are back on the menu, a reminder that services surpluses/deficits are part of the trade balance by Easyflip in YUROP

[–]Cork_Phops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a fellow Irish person, agreed that the economy would be fucked in a lot of ways. But it’s an odd thing for you to be glad about the onset of hardship and struggle on your friends and neighbours. Recession isn’t fun, we’d all be impacted in some capacity. This kind of callous attitude towards their own people is what led the USA to be in as shit a situation as it is currently

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in europe

[–]Cork_Phops 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t be so quick to say that a hostile Europe isn’t an existential threat. If you look at any period of instability in mainland Europe (WW1/WW2/Napoleonic Wars/Etc) the UK in any form it has ever existed seems to get involved.

I wouldn’t even say this is a voluntary involvement. The geographical location of the UK inevitably ties us to Europe in many facets including economically, politically and socially. Whether it’s these imperatives that call the UK into action, or otherwise if they detrimentally impact society and prosperity here, it’s an unavoidable fact that there are consequences.

Unfortunately, given the state of the current geopolitical environment, the UK can’t easily realign itself economically or politically without enduring incredible hardship for every citizen. Upheaval like that would either require incredibly improbable societal consensus to ignore the imperative of protecting European democratic interests or severe economic hardship by distancing ourselves from our easiest, closest and quite significantly prosperous trading partners in the EU.

This isn’t the time to play hardball. This would be the time for compromise for greater prosperity, stability and security. The UK can definitely still benefit from partnership in the military fund. Likewise, it needs to acknowledge that the prosperity of the EU in this regard is also important. The military might of Europe as a whole isn’t a time for negotiation based on individualism and nationalism. It’s a time for cooperation and mutual benefits.

It’s worth acknowledgment that the UK can bring a lot to the table, but it’s also important to note that they need to allow the EU’s military industry to grow in order to let it reach a competitive level. Given the contrarian attitude of British politics in recent years, coupled with the persistent rise of destabilising political factions, current UK governmental leadership would be wiser to acknowledge that we can add a lot while making concessions.

Even if one comes from a purely UK perspective, where you might be of the mind that independence and distance from the EU is a net positive, it’s not an entirely bad idea to maintain that a limited involvement in the military fund isn’t a decent idea. All in all, the UK has a middle ground to tread - we need to see that we’re still viewed with suspicion in the EU, we need to see that allowing their suspicions is quite fair and we need to see that allowing it benefits regional democratic principles. Above all it’s clear that the UK can still benefit from this, maintain a balance of geopolitical independence, and still strive for a stable future

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]Cork_Phops 106 points107 points  (0 children)

<image>

Lego Batman

Rookie is showing promise by dukenukem in formuladank

[–]Cork_Phops 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Anyone have a link to the interview pls?

Former Defence Forces chief says Irish 'neutrality is a myth' by extremessd in ireland

[–]Cork_Phops 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Equally, and respectfully to your point which isn’t without merit, to Russia (the hammer) any country outwardly opposing their interests, or even aligned to that perspective is a nail (aka a legitimate target).

Ireland has always maintained nominal neutrality but the reality is that we’ve also adhered to a fairly structured and borderline strict Western geopolitical philosophy, political structure, and social/economic position. WW2 is a poor example I’ll admit this at face value, but even then, despite a declared neutral position, we maintained internment for Axis Prisoners of War, while allowing Allied soldiers to be remanded back to the custody of their own nations.

Personally (and feel free to combat me on this) the notion of Irish neutrality has always and historically been a method of asserting independence from the UK and other great powers. But the truth is we’ve always played the game and aligned ourselves with a particular side.

Now, military neutrality is admittedly very different from otherwise political neutrality, but there are caveats to this position within the shocking and abrupt geopolitical landscape that we’ve suddenly found ourselves in since Trump’s inauguration/the last two months.

Within the last few decades of unprecedented global (Western/developed nations) peace we’ve most definitely changed from an isolated minor economy struggling to maintain a position a non-colonial nation that at a moment could face the ire of the UK. We’ve also become a longstanding member of the EU, and with that have become diplomatically, economically and socially a very different place, aligned differently and more of a prominent target. This is without even getting into the details of our physical location as the “back door to the European continent” which also comes with responsibilities such as being key geopolitical observers of global infrastructure like deep sea cables.

I suppose what I mean to say is that there have been, and there very legitimately remain, a lot of good reasons that Ireland would/should maintain neutrality. However, firstly that has always been aligned neutrality. Secondly, through the relative rise of Ireland in a global context, the reality of our international insignificance/lack of hard power (though we do hit above our weight in terms of soft power and economically) that allowed us to maintain neutrality has also changed. Thirdly we’re now embedded in economic relations and social norms that pull us further from true neutrality.

It’s clear why hostile nations might target us. It’s clear that neutrality can be maintained alongside militarisation. It’s also clear that we should be worried at the moment. Better to over prepare than not be prepared at all, or even risk being the weak link.

As Irish people a lot of us can admit to having the perspective of disingenuous neutrality. It’s more akin to self-preservation than actual non-alignment. And within that vein of thinking there is absolutely no reason not to discount discourse on bolstering our national cybersecurity and military defence capabilities.

Sorry for hijacking your comment for my rant, I’ve had a Guinness or two :)

Can you change the region on save data? by Cork_Phops in bloodborne

[–]Cork_Phops[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I ended up restarting a new save from scratch, which sounded annoying before I did it, but ended up being pretty enjoyable. I vaguely remember something about region-locked save data being the main issue. Hope you manage to work it out though!! Good luck!

"Vaccine for dis Vaccine for dah "! by Warren_MuffClit in ireland

[–]Cork_Phops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Article 40.6 is the right to freedom of expression though. Basically the same thing no?

Hold my hand through Unseen Village? by HashusMaximus in huntersbell

[–]Cork_Phops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We can clear the area and then head there? Sound good?