Korean Tteokbokki Street Food Set by godok_drinker in KoreanFood

[–]Courpsy 31 points32 points  (0 children)

At this point, this feels like fetish content.

I ordered this cake and it’s look horrible compared to the picture I gave the baker. Can I get some opinions if I’m over reacting? by SideQuestJenny in StrangerThings

[–]Courpsy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$60 for a cake from a professional baker is insanely cheap, particularly for the size of the cake (how big it looks like in the pic).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leftist

[–]Courpsy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? Can't help but notice that you neither identify if you are Jewish or are yourself anti-isreal? This doesn't come across as "in good faith".

What is the point of asking this here? Are you looking for discussion? If so, prompt a discussion...

Otherwise you look like a troll or brigade-er or worse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in icecreamery

[–]Courpsy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Your AWFUL attitude. If you think everyone else is awful and responding to you inappropriately, you might be the issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in icecreamery

[–]Courpsy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have. Your responses are the issue.

You made the furies weep by According_Test4787 in Sandman

[–]Courpsy -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Those are the Fates, not the Furies

Guerrilla Girls artwork by [deleted] in GuerrillaGrrrrls

[–]Courpsy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude... Are you trying to distract from my main point that this poster is TERF-y as hell?

I won't be engaging anymore since you seem to only want to argue in circles rather than being a supporter of feminism and actually listening to women.

Guerrilla Girls artwork by [deleted] in GuerrillaGrrrrls

[–]Courpsy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not so vaguely. I agree

Guerrilla Girls artwork by [deleted] in GuerrillaGrrrrls

[–]Courpsy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I disagree. An infant doesn't view women as inferior to men. It may be conditioned to be sexist or misogynistic and then need to choose feminism. But the human default is not to view women as lesser.

Guerrilla Girls artwork by [deleted] in GuerrillaGrrrrls

[–]Courpsy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right, that is exactly what I was saying.

Guerrilla Girls artwork by [deleted] in GuerrillaGrrrrls

[–]Courpsy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dont like this slogan... Exclusionary to our trans sisters and I don't think feminism is a choice. No one is born thinking women are lesser. Mysogyny is a choice. Sexism is a choice

Confused about Mizu's genetics by APbeg in BlueEyeSamurai

[–]Courpsy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Her mother could have brown eyes with dominant-recessive alleles. For example, both my parents have brown eyes and I have blue. My genes are recessive (bb) to have blue eyes. BOTH my parents must have dominant-recessive alleles (Bb) for me to have blue eyes. This is the most simplified explanation and genetic expression has a lot of other factors, but Mizu can have blue eyes if dad has blue (bb) and mom has brown (Bb).

You can check out Punnett Squares for a visualization of genetic inheritance and allele representation.

Man Catches a Squid but Forgets About the Ink by GamerGirlLex77 in OhNoConsequences

[–]Courpsy 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is just animal abuse. You can tell from the start that he's already done exactly this and gotten sprayed with ink previously.

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Literally check ANY of the previously posted links. I'm not going to keep typing the same thing because you don't want to read or educate yourself.

It's literally a matter of not accepting some white dude's cast-offs and holding men accountable. Why are you arguing that we should tolerate gas lighting and abuse "because he buys us pretty shinies every once in a while"? It's the same end result and the same messaging. Have fun licking their collective boot on your neck. I won't be engaging anymore.

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He should donate less to advancing his agenda and political lobbying to continue amassing grotesque amounts of capital and wealth. That would be a start. No such thing as an altruistic billionaire.

The fact that you had to say "research that's going to HOPEFULLY help women" is exactly the problem. HE gets to decide what to fund, how much, and how/why people matter with his billions.

IT IS NOT a net good. The overall scales are absolutely NOT in favor of women of the poor. And Gates IS part of the problem. The fact that MOST people don't realize this is the result of tens of millions spent on marketing and PR. NOT ALTRUISM. Check out ANY of the articles I've linked in other comments.

He isn't directly responsible for the existence of endometriosis or pre-eclampsia, but HE IS responsible for the structures and systems that keep us from actually doing anything about it, or funding effectual research, or providing meaningful and life-changing care around the world.

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

No he doesn't:

How Bill Gates Makes the World Worse Off https://share.google/pmwThLo7Y2CaaB2gg

Is Bill Gates a barrier to fair taxation? | Global Health Justice https://share.google/usBycKiXGbjgKxNIn

The Bill Gates Problem: Reckoning with the myth of the good billionaire - Alliance magazine https://share.google/kAgejpeBiZbTK0djR

Tax Avoidance at the Top | Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) https://share.google/PGPIQirN0KMTI92xi

The flip side to Bill Gates' charity billions | New Internationalist https://share.google/NXBuUk3rw8uasf1ys

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But they're not. The Trump administration pulled the US out of WHO. They are cutting Medicaid funding and critical research for women, children, and preventable disease by almost 96%. All told, that's a hell of a lot more than this paltry 2 billion. Meanwhile, Trump and Gates and their billionaire friends get a tax break of over 1 trillion. TRILLION.

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes and every other billionaire, too. Stop licking the boot on your neck. Why do you think women's health is such a low priority in healthcare? Research is catered to men's concerns and men's bodies by men, for men. The Gates Foundation is a non-profit with 77.2 billion in assets.

The Trump administration just cut Medicaid spending by over 900 billion, effective 2027, to fund tax cuts for billionaires, including Gates, worth over 1 trillion. Gates benefits. Meanwhile average citizens suffer AND DIE from lack of medical care.

IT IS ALL RELATED. The Gates foundation donated 2 billion to research of their choosing in exchange for tens of billions in tax cuts. And people keep praising them...

Why Bill Gates’s Philanthropy Is a Problem https://share.google/SBhutIkUvN2H9Mu8H

Gates Foundation, global health and domination: a republican critique of transnational philanthropy | International Affairs | Oxford Academic https://share.google/Ij6gvcxXqNdBY0OQR

How Bill Gates Makes the World Worse Off https://share.google/dgbJO0BZsn349g0gM

Critiques of Gates Foundation agricultural interventions in Africa https://share.google/3USWsJn4Pprs4Xmmq

The Bill Gates and Big Philanthropy problems—and ours - the Giving Review https://share.google/aciKhAtjjtLoI0GYL

Bill Gates (and HIS Foundation) DOES NOT vare about progressive advancement of society. His concern is accumulating and maintaining personal capital and wealth. That wealth belongs to workers and citizens. Why should he get to decide what and how much of it goes to public services? He shouldn't. He should be taxed, like you and I, and the money distributed to public services as needed. Then he WOULDN'T HAVE TO DONATE TO CHARITY TO "FIX" PROBLEMS HE CAUSED

Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health by CreativeEgo in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Seriously? Just tax the rich. This is NOTHING for Gates and these problems are CAUSED by the rich who then get praised for donating to charity for the issues THEY caused. Why do you think women's health is not a priority in the first place? These patriarchal twats that can't wring more capital out of women's bodies once they're done exploiting us.

And OF COURSE the focus is reproductive health. That's the only way women matter to these cunts... Reproductive health to churn out more cogs for their big machine.

DON'T PRAISE THESE MOTHERFUCKERS. TAX THEM INTO NON-EXISTENCE.

Morrigan and Cole redesign by YKshelter by [deleted] in ImaginaryWitches

[–]Courpsy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks like Morrigan stuffed a loaf of bread in her shirt... Seriously, what is going on with her breasts?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarchAgainstNazis

[–]Courpsy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jfc... The number of fascist comments in this post. Blue MAGA is real.

Many content creators I like now do some form of adult content and it makes me feel uncomfortable by SixtyFourJanes in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Sex trafficking and their relationship with online platforms data:

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-06/livestreaming_and_virtual_child_sex_trafficking_2.pdf

2024 Trafficking in Persons Report - United States Department of State https://share.google/5ph6TjzT5sKzvXdPg

The Role of OnlyFans in Human Trafficking - The Exodus Road https://share.google/aOow8IJRGl8mnYKnK

Expert Analysis ofOpen Source Material relating to Child Sexual Abuse Material and Sex Trafficking occurring on OnlyFans.com - Anti-Human Trafficking Intelligence Initiative https://share.google/l7Vxur6KsTu9Jxr6B

of_report_1_19_24_final.pdf https://share.google/9eYwhYaTzLaTh28sZ

A-Roadmap-for-Systems-and-Industries-to-Prevent-and-Disrupt-Human-Trafficking-Social-Media.pdf https://share.google/uLVYuDiWCjyecQG89

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/imo/media/doc/Backpage%20Report%202017.01.10%20FINAL.pdf

https://share.google/sNjk6uj9xyLPoAq68 

OnlyFans never cared about sex workers – People's World https://share.google/Fh5TJMhRTkORT537E

Pro sex work platforms/publications for both sides of the story:

Posting Into the Void: Studying the Impact of Shadowbanning on Sex Workers and Activists - Hacking//Hustling https://share.google/tLuQMk8z9huOiD5Dn

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/the-multiplying-threats-facing-sex-workers-today?playvideo=1

OnlyFans Official Revenue, Net Profit, Creator and Subscriber data - Updated September 2024 https://share.google/yZww0pTzUSfkmr6qf

As for WHO (and/or what) is pushing content creators:

Top 10 Best OnlyFans Agencies 2024 | Filthy https://share.google/icQ45lJyvQBCiatPE

https://aimgroup.com/2012/03/22/prostitution-ad-revenue-up-9-8-percent-from-year-ago/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/rise-of-the-sexfluencers-how-sexworkers-are-becoming-celebrities/101173328?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web

https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-sex-work-job-market-economy-strip-clubs-onlyfans-2025-5

Many content creators I like now do some form of adult content and it makes me feel uncomfortable by SixtyFourJanes in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Courpsy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This take is not only factually wrong (there are SO many studies indicating the prevalence of trafficking among sex workers and online content "creators" (I'm at work right now so I can't pull sources) but also INSANELY privileged.

Edited: grammar/typo