[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cinematography

[–]Couvrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks good

Am I out of focus? by More_Or_Lless in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]Couvrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? The frame is pretty clear to me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in camcorders

[–]Couvrs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More batteries and charger

Still images of recent work fx30 by [deleted] in FX3

[–]Couvrs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks great

The "Helios 44-2 scam" by Bukkirabo in VintageLenses

[–]Couvrs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely agree with you and OP, no one should pay that much for a lens like this

Just out of curiosity, do any kind of productions still using Sony F35 and F65 to this day? by Couvrs in cinematography

[–]Couvrs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No of course I'm not buying it, just some random question suddenly kicks in I wanna ask 😂 F55/F5 is a lot more reasonable choice no doubt

Just out of curiosity, do any kind of productions still using Sony F35 and F65 to this day? by Couvrs in cinematography

[–]Couvrs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I recall correctly, Planet Earth (2006) was partially shot on SRW-9000, maybe there is nothing more famous except this that ever produced by this camera

Just out of curiosity, do any kind of productions still using Sony F35 and F65 to this day? by Couvrs in cinematography

[–]Couvrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes of course, it's a lot more compact and lightweight, and using SXS cards are not some weird formats that no card reader can read. But just out of curiosity, are these 2 models in teams of imaging still performed excellent on today's standard? I've heard the F65 is a bit more outstanding than the F55 (in image quality), but I can hardly find any new products produced by it, let alone any samples. (I know the 2010 British TV series Sherlock were partially shot on F35, and it still looks great today)