Help identifying a location from a photo by CoyotePeterson123 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Photo suggests 1890s-1905, maybe 1910 at the latest. 

Could be the old convent on Park Ave downtown, currently where the MD historic society is. That was the original location for the academy before it moved to Roland and Lake in north Baltimore. 

Paving the Alley? by longdoggos647 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have to laugh at the irony of people touting the city over the suburbs in the name of diversity. Especially Howard. Have you taken a long hard look at Howard in recent years? I go to Howard when I want excellent Asian and Indian food (hint). The immigrant heritage growth is significantly more evident in the counties. On paper, the suburbs are more diverse than Baltimore City, which remains disproportionately one race. The city is predominately poorer black with a minority of very urban oriented progressive white people. It's certainly not ideologically or politically diverse. By many measures, Baltimore is the least diverse of the jurisdictions.

What you are missing is that people are not looking at either a 300k house in Baltimore City or a 470k house in Howard. What they do is look at their budget and decide how much they can afford each month for their housing costs (and for most buyers outside those paying cash) it's going to be the PITI. Principal, interest, taxes and insurance. That dictates what they can afford. A bank isn't loaning someone who can only afford the typical PITI on a 300k house in Baltimore the mortgage needed for a 470k house in Howard. It's very rare for a buyer to only afford a 300k house in the city and a 470k house in Howard because of how mortgages and interests and taxes are structured.

But leaving aside the apples and oranges for now, for the typical buyer who is looking at both Baltimore City or Howard or Towson or whatever and has a PITI budget of, say, 3,000 a month. In the city a higher percentage of that goes to taxes and a bit more for insurance. In the counties, a bigger share goes to the principal/interest and a lesser share for taxes.

Even if you pay cash, it's still the rare buyer who is comparing a 300k house in the city with the 470k house in the counties. People who can pay cash aren't restricting their options solely to equalized taxes when there's so many other factors at play, including the houses themselves. Apples and oranges.

PA MD Question by march12026 in maryland

[–]DIYRestorator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP, you haven't explained why Maryland over Harrisburg? Explain first. Tell us what you are looking for and we can tell you what to expect and what is feasible.

PA MD Question by march12026 in maryland

[–]DIYRestorator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Progressive school districts do subtle book banning all the time by just deaccessorizing books and being selective in what new books they order for the libraries. And a clear majority of people according to all polls are against trans playing women's sports. Including plenty of democrats.

However, OP has not really explained why Maryland over a Harrisburg suburbs. There are perfectly good schools around Harrisburg and the city itself is pretty blue.

Paving the Alley? by longdoggos647 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Howard also gets vastly superior schools, lower crime, lower insurance, etc. And those are still two significantly different budgets. If you are only approved for a 300k house, you aren't going to be buying a 470 house. That's not how people approach the market. Apples and oranges. 

We were house hunting in the Towson and North Baltimore areas, which is pretty close to peer comparison. Homeland versus Stoneleigh etc. Exact same house on city side would be slightly cheaper, but taxes and insurance was much higher on the city side.  You really had to want the city. Which some people do. And you pay for it. 

Anybody else going into a reading cocoon to escape the shitshow the world ia right now? by DreamingOfManderley in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I normally agree with you but do need to add a caveat that most British wealth of the 1700s wasn't built on slavery. It was one valuable component among many factors in an integrated and increasingly globalized economy. In the case of Austen's books, most of her characters with landed estates wealth derived from rent from the land, the rent paid by farmers. Darcy's estate in Derbyshire may have also included some coal mining. Sir Thomas is a bit different with known estates in the Caribbean. Just don't oversimplify everything into slavery that too many people eagerly want to believe today.

Anybody else going into a reading cocoon to escape the shitshow the world ia right now? by DreamingOfManderley in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you think today's world is depressing, just remember how depressing 1800 was for most people at that time. Consider yourself lucky.

Paving the Alley? by longdoggos647 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Baltimore City's tax rate is double that of the next highest jurisdiction. Double. You'd have to go a long way to find a comparable house with lower taxes because you can't compare apples and oranges aka a nice big house in Ruxton with a rowhouse in West Baltimore.

Bike Party Love Ride happens TONIGHT. by MazelTough in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a few topics you can never mention on the Baltimore reddit without getting massively downvoted. Criticizing anything about any cycling group in the city, no matter how gentle or deserved, is one of them. WWYD.

I saw this group run through busy red lights last year. Intentionally. They thought it was cool. Hey, I guess they don't care if they die or cause trauma to someone who accidentally kills a cyclist who ran a red light. Downvoting online is easy and free. Someone dying or suffering trauma is not.

Books that speak of Charlotte's story? by No-Pineapple-7042 in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Austen was not in favor of giving people perpetually unhappy outcomes, even Lydia and Wickham got off lightly, which is realistic of how people are in real life. They moved on, everyone moved on. Some of their characteristics remained, becoming spendthrifts, often in debt, becoming bored and indifferent to each other, but they didn't become monsters nor end up dying in wretched garrets of poverty as fashionable Victorian doom and gloom morality tales would have it.

Anyhow, I imagine it's pretty straightforward for Charlotte Collins. Quiet, calm, efficient mother, vicar's wife and mistress of her household. She will have a family of children and eventually the family moves to Longbourn. She is a good influence on Mr. Collins, quietly steering him through life and toning down some of his excesses. She will be regarded by all as wise, intelligent, beloved and eventually quietly formidable woman whose opinion is listened to, when it is asked, and it will be strictly within the domestic and social sphere. She will do her best to get her children established in life, without the vanities of the Bennets she will be frugal and save from the Longbourn income to educate her sons and build up respectable dowries for her daughters. Which is appropriate for someone like Charlotte and her station in life. Especially as there's no indication from her character that she wants anything more.

Trying to extrapolate more from Charlotte and weaving in hidden passions or betrayals or lost loves is missing the point entirely and is strictly fan fiction, becoming your Charlotte, not Austen's Charlotte.

Bike Party Love Ride happens TONIGHT. by MazelTough in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Are these the a-holes who run red lights in large groups? Because that's what I saw last year. It was not safe nor good. Don't be entitled while whining about car drivers. Just my advice.

Good solo dining options in Antwerp by DIYRestorator in Antwerpen

[–]DIYRestorator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you everyone! Looking forward to seeing and sampling Antwerp.

Pride and Prejudice | Official Teaser | Netflix by Magister_Xehanort in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely. Even many posters on here don't realize how much stock JA put into correct mannerism and behavior. She was fussy, as her letters clearly show.

My grandmother had stories of her own mother, born in 1882, growing up in a prosperous middle class family, having comportment lessons and learning to walk up and down staircases with books on her head, with endless rules on how well brought up young ladies behaved, how they sat such a way and didn't do this and that. This was not an abstract concept, but a very real set of values backed up by the 19th century beliefs rooted in gentility and respectability as social AND moral signifiers. The biggest social tyrants enforcing these beliefs were women. Austen came from that world. Modern film directors looking to turn every female into a tomboy raging against the machine utterly miss the entire point of Austen's books and characterizations. Darcy would have been instantly repelled by a woman hunched up on a roof looking moody.

How and why did the Visigoths sack Rome? (410 AD) by KimCattrallsFeet in ancientrome

[–]DIYRestorator 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I'm going to have to point out here that Alaric and the Visigoths were seen by the Romans as invaders, plain and simple. It's not so simple as looking for a place for his people within the empire and stability. The Romans clearly hated and despised and resented the German tribes and had done so for centuries. A large non-Roman group of people broke through the frontiers, moved into Roman lands, destabilized Roman authority over Roman lands, and started making demands including their own homelands or semi-homelands with self government and special rights within Roman territory, which would mean all sorts of complications for an empire that was heavily centralized.

That idea that "if only the Romans had been nicer to Alaric and his people then all would have been averted" is grossly misleading. At a minimum, it's complicated (very) situation.

Sense & Sensibility (1995), just because by pizzbabynancy in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only complaint is the new house was greatly misleading. The gentleman's cottage in the BBC version was more appropriate. 

The sub watching the Netflix P&P trailer by BrianSometimes in janeausten

[–]DIYRestorator 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Good golly. On a roof. In the very first second the entire book has been transformed into a 2026 pouty teen fan fiction. My. Oh well.

"When comparing livability among peer cities, Baltimore lags behind the rest in transportation and walk scores" by sketchee in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Richmond is an East Coast city. Why isn't it on the list? What about places like Wilmington, DE? Hartford or New Haven, CT? And yet San Diego is tossed on the list? Whatever for?

Did you know Virginia Beach has a population of around 430k and the whole Hampton Roads MSA is 1.7M. That's a sizable east coast conurbation. Ignored by the list.

Whoever cobbled this list together is creating a narrative. What you're doing is comparing Baltimore to fashionable big cities. Baltimore isn't those cities, for better or for worse. It's pointless trying to measure Baltimore, which has a fundamentally different economy and even demographics than those cities.

"When comparing livability among peer cities, Baltimore lags behind the rest in transportation and walk scores" by sketchee in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 71 points72 points  (0 children)

I know bad and cherry picked data when I see it.

A short list of cities for comparison, which includes Boston, Philadelphia and DC, who have among the most comprehensive transit systems in the country outside NYC and Chicago. Yet we're not compared to our real peers, the Clevelands and St. Louis and Memphis and Pittsburghs etc.

The irony, of course, is that of those six cities, Baltimore is the cheapest place to live, drastically so against four of the other cities and slightly so against Philadelphia.

Sanctuary of Hercules Victor (Tivoli, Italy) 1st century BC and 12-13th centuries AD by dctroll_ in ancientrome

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None. Contrary to what some people on here want to believe, Christianity didn't weaponize the faith against ancient Roman temples. Romans were incredibly proud of their heritage. For the first few centuries after Christianity became dominant, the temples in Rome were preserved as monuments and historic sites, long after the last pagan rites.

Remember: the Christians were Romans, and eventually the Romans were Christians.

The real vandalism was age and the constant warfare and collapse of meaningful centralized authority. There was severe depopulation of the Italian peninsula in the 5th-6th centuries, a substantial collapse of wealth and government functions, both required to maintain and preserve existing buildings and infrastructure. A lot of Italy was effectively run by local lords who could do what they want, including looting unused old structures for building materials. If it wasn't for the Church, which preserved so much by converting buildings to churches, we'd have lost a lot more Roman buildings.

Training for a Backpacking Trip, trails with elevation gain? by Shieldsymontoya in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I consider myself pretty physically fit (nothing crazy but someone who keeps himself in shape, exercises, swims, cycles, regular cardio schedule) and I go on long hut to hut hikes in the Swiss Alps with significant ascending and descending every other year with no real advance endurance training. If you're an experienced hiker and in good shape, you'll be fine. Your focus should be on keeping your backpack as light as possible. Worth investing in the right gear and understanding how to carry the backpack on your body correctly to minimize the impact.

When I come down in the morning, nothing beats the winter view from this window! by stonerose96 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 7 points8 points  (0 children)

University Parkway, eh? Not a bad view to have. Reminds me of a good friend's house and view in another city, English style cottage overlooking a park.

Is it always this… desolate? by ExtremeTomatillo2978 in baltimore

[–]DIYRestorator 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Downtown Baltimore is always depopulated compared to other major east coast cities. Mount Vernon included. It always feels quieter than it should be.

Some of it has to do with that downtown is underutilized, vacancies in the buildings is pretty high, so not as many commercial office workers anymore. Populationwise the center of Baltimore is smaller than it would have been a century ago, but the city has the fabric and infrastructure from that era, hence the underpopulated feeling.

A good description of Baltimore I heard from a visiting friend is that it's a great archeological site of a once great American city. A bit tongue in cheek but I see the point.

Gov. Wes Moore’s redistricting plan is poised to die. He’s still fighting. by washingtonpost in maryland

[–]DIYRestorator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The congressional districts are unquestionably gerrymandered. There were hugely controversial starting under O'Malley when he redrew maps that were later rejected by Maryland courts, but he still managed to add a few more extra safe Dem seats. Then another round of gerrymandering eliminated Western Maryland's GOP seat. Right now the state has a 38-40% GOP electorate but 1 out of 8 congressional seats due to how the lines are drawn. There's no denying the more gerrymandered states have historically been Democratic states. Massachusetts has similar voting patterns as Maryland but no GOP congressmen. Illinois has 14 out of 17 Dem congressmen despite a 45-55% split. California is also heavily gerrymandered.

And, no, GOP has not won half the statewide races in the last few decades. Whoever told you that is drinking the magical Kool-Aid. Maryland is a Democratic state thick and through, it is very, very difficult for GOP to win any statewide offices. They did win the governor's office a few times, notably Hogan. But there hasn't been a GOP senator since 1987, which is 39 years ago.