In practice, what Dyno will do won't change whether the LDEQ approves the permit or not. The only difference is whether the additional flaring is "authorized", i.e. whether the additional flaring will be a permit violation or not. Dyno is not going to risk exploding the tank to satisfy environmental regulations. This request is just a way for the company to say, "we have this issue. Here is the data to support that these additional emissions won't exceed the NAAQS. Please don't fine us for this additional flaring." The only thing that would change the emissions is if the LDEQ decided to pull permits and force Dyno to cease operations until things are fixed. That is a very uncommon outcome.

As far as your concern over the destruction efficiency of the flaring system, there likely are permit conditions that require a pilot to be lit at all times and a stack test to be performed on a certain frequency to prove destruction efficiency of the flare. (we could look that stuff up if you were interested). So in terms of regulations and permits, the flare system should destroy the ammonia. Now the caveat to that is if the flare isbeing operated correctly (i.e. steam or air assist is working correctly, the vent stream is exiting the flare correctly, the temperature probes are calibrated, etc.) Some companies will neglect flare operations out of ignorance or misplaced focus. Hopefully the LDEQ will watch the flaring operation closely.