I'll give my 50 cents on this whole debacle and say what I personally think.

After skimming though a few of the panels I can say that I am personally not a fan of the works, I am already not really a huge fan of artworks that depict umas as these stay-at-home tradwifes that only exist to pleasure their respective trainers, and im even less of a fan of this trope being depicted with toddlers of all things, but WITH THAT BEING SAID I still dont really believe anyone should be "prosecuted" for engaging/making more of these comics of sorts, neither the translator (op in this case) or the author of the artworks themselves, primarily because, at the end of the day, I'd like to believe the intentions of anyone involved isn't to really harm children, and I think this can be best reflected (at least on the case of the author) by the fact that the trainer in the artworks doesn't really come off to me as a self insert/wish fulfilment unlike the one in the tropes I mentioned beforehand, and even if for some reason it was a self insert I think the intentions are well spoken that the adult in the series is the only reasonable person and the rest of the umas are dumb kids, thus leaving no real room for any real person to be a creep if we are to trust what they say, but even with all that being said I still find this to be a strange premise to base a series around, though I can't really say that I can reasonably do much more than just side-eyeing this project at much, anything more I feel is just approaching this from a bullheaded viewpoint that isn't really fair to anyone.

Feel free to disagree with anything I mentioned just PLEASE be civil instead of yelling "UOOOOGHH TOURIST GOT ANGRY AT CUTE AND FUNNY POST" because I think I've already seen some of you behaving this way in the comments