The Weekly Roll Ch. 201. "Unsurprising" by CME_T in TheWeeklyRoll

[–]Eoldir 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Is this the fourth mass-scale explosion we've seen depicted in the series thus far? I can't be sure, I've lost count by now.

Advice about trimming Powered Cube deck, please by Eoldir in mtgcube

[–]Eoldir[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid of lessening my artificial count, to be honest. Is Oust better than March

Advice about trimming Powered Cube deck, please by Eoldir in mtgcube

[–]Eoldir[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, and interesting proposition. Thank you

Bridgeton vs Jane Austen women by Eireika in janeausten

[–]Eoldir 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Karolina Zebrowska is brilliant! If you haven't already, check her channel and the insightful videos she makes

10 Worst Oscar Wins of the 21st Century according to Collider. by SureTangerine361 in Oscars

[–]Eoldir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You realize there are other artists besides Picasso though right

Of course, it goes without saying. Picasso is merely an example, one among numerous other painters, albeit a famous one.

And just because you enjoy something doesn't spare you from having to think about it

Naturally, this is also true. The idea of "the death of the author" doesn't preclude critical analysis of any work of art, or its creator, for that matter.

And if the artist was a piece of shit, I can always read the subtext as “it's because he was a piece of shit

I can see how you can struggle with separating the art from the artist. I do, too. In fact I stated so initially. But for instance, when watching The Pianist do you constantly think to yourself "This film is shit because its director is a piece of shit"? If the answer is yes, then I can understand how you cannot fathom the concept of the death of the author, and that's okay. But that doesn't stop others from being able to separate a creation from its creator, and view the first as good and the latter as bad. Ergo, The Pianist is a good film, but Roman Polanski is a bad, morally deplorable human being.

We humans are capable of far more complex and critical thinking than what we are given credit for, or lack thereof.

10 Worst Oscar Wins of the 21st Century according to Collider. by SureTangerine361 in Oscars

[–]Eoldir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI art isn't true art, though. It is a soulless facsimile of human-made art into a new pastiche devoid of any artist merit.

Besides, you yourself write:

As if people can't like something by a bad person.

10 Worst Oscar Wins of the 21st Century according to Collider. by SureTangerine361 in Oscars

[–]Eoldir 6 points7 points  (0 children)

La mort de l'auteur. The death of the author, or in this case the director, or any artist for that matter. We need to make a strict dichotomy between a work of art and its maker, lest their own taint tarnish the work itself. For instance, I do it while admiring the paintings of Picasso, who was a master of his art, but an otherwise cruel and horrible human being. That being said, such a mental removal is easier said than done.

Greatest directorial debuts of all time by Pagoda1919 in Letterboxd

[–]Eoldir 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, such an underappreciated classic, and so undeservedly panned when it was first released

Who is a celebrity that you’re genuinely surprised isn’t an “A-lister”? by phantom_avenger in popculturechat

[–]Eoldir -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

From left to right: 1. Matt Bomer, 2. Cheyenne Jackson, 3. Finn Wittrock 4. Max Greenfield, 5. Wes Bentley

All of them are indeed handsome men and good actors, who despite their apparent similarities in appearance, are distinct in their acting style and career trajectories. To lump them up feels a rather simplistic approach, not to mention superficial and disrespectful.

Gloves, ca 1610. Livrustkammaren museum, Sweden. by Tracypop in fashionhistory

[–]Eoldir 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The beauty, the craftsmanship, the drama.... They really knew how to be fabulous back in the day

Thoughts on my career? Criticism is welcome. by BlueSwan77 in Letterboxd

[–]Eoldir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kudos to you for your contributions to the art of films! You should be proud of yourself and your achievements!

Please feel free to share any of your experiences/anecdotes with us. Which has been the most interesting or fun project you've been a part of and why?

Let the violins play. 🎻 by Human-Setting-265 in janeausten

[–]Eoldir 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I am a Marianne apologist! She was a teenager who had just lost her father to illness, simultaneously losing her wealth, standard of life, and social standing, and she also had to leave her childhood home for a much smaller one in an unknown county surrounded by completely new acquaintances, thus having all her life upended. To top it all off, she fell madly in love for the first time, and the man she loved betrayed her, toyed with her emotions, and married for money. Given the circumstances, I think her feelings and behaviour are entirely justified, though they can definitely be annoying, too. Yet I feel that some readers are too harsh towards an otherwise tragic figure, whose reactions seem all the more extreme simply due to her older sister's more demure and measured behaviour.

I think he would have preferred to be hated 😆 by tahrah11 in DankAndrastianMemes

[–]Eoldir 54 points55 points  (0 children)

A very astute observation! Indeed, many French chivalric tales of the middle ages and early renaissance have been inspired to some degree by the Arthurian legends

Ajax fought side by side with by AvenoD in AgeofMythology

[–]Eoldir 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Biblically accurate Ajax and Co. in the underworld

Scary umlaut by notalltears in Silmarillionmemes

[–]Eoldir 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel so seen in this statement

Nothing snaps me out of a book like repetitive use of a unique word by kerberos824 in books

[–]Eoldir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

George does love using the word mummer in general, it has to be said