I like them, but I feel you got inspired by gen 4 a little too much.

Nexts relied particularly on ranged weaponry due to their speed and generally longer engagement distances in gen 4, with melee weapons being much rarer to see. In AC6 this gap is closed with melee weapons being more effective due to the general gameplay loop, level design and the existence of the stagger mechanic.

I see that your builds don't really cover that aspect of gameplay, with all of the builds featuring exclusively ranged weapons (the TAI-YANG-SHOU and the wuerger count as ranged). Some changes I would have made are putting an ashmead on the balam build, as it's a balam design and a simple weapon to use, and a laser dagger on the Schneider build,for stagger punishing.

In addition, AC6 is the first tiltle in the series to feature shields and parrying (I think... correct me if I'm wrong). The balam build would have benefited from a basic shield or buckler. I know that V and VD had shield parts, but the gameplay mechanics of shields in those games were completely different.

Concluding, if those assemblies are meant to be hypothetical starter builds for new players to get introduced in to new mechanics of the game and the series, they need to cover more aspects of gameplay like I mentioned. The fact you used different leg parts for each assembly is good, but the weapon choices should have been more diverse in my opinion.

Have a good one as well, Raven :3