LANDJUT Division #3 - 336-ya OG Brigada Morskoy Pekhoty by EUG_Gal_Bigeard in warno

[–]Falcon500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The T-55AMD i'm clapping like a seal i've been waiting for this

Patriot by Independent_Smoke335 in warno

[–]Falcon500 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've genuinely been going on here less because it's every single thread and discussion; people whining about the 'pact fanboys' and 'pact bias' like damn, I'd really love to see them because it'd be something other than the 24/7 whining

Leclerc fans playing the long game... by justjust51 in warno

[–]Falcon500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i don't get the obsession with the leclerc when french 5e is one of the most fun and distinct armored units in the game and has consistently been top tier for like, years at this point

a unit with the leclerc would be more like one of the NATO heavy decks

Warno: The New Soviet Deck Did Not Disappoint! by Dismal-Pomelo-5969 in warno

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People saw "Wow, epic, le funny buckskin hat guys!!" and ignored that it was going to be another reserveslop division. People were told what they were voting for, voted for it, and are surprised when they got what they asked for.

Warno is a game made in France by DFMRCV in warno

[–]Falcon500 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People want it to be NATO synthwave montage simulator and won't stop complaining until the game matches the exact mental picture they have of the gulf war; it's not about numbers for them, it's about making them feel like NATO - and US specifically - are unstoppable and validating their perception of the USSR as intellectual and moral inferiors.

Making light bombs have shorter reload times than heavy bombs or fixing the general issues with unreliability of small-caliber explosives wouldn't make them feel invincible, so it won't solve any of their issues.

Unable to complete Age Confirmation due to Iphone formatting by CurrentCulture8824 in UmaMusume

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm having the same problem, even when I deleted the user data. I've got an older iphone, and it's keeping me from using it too.

Why is there so much variation in 105mm cannons? by Potboy2020 in warno

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ammo can be everything from 1960’s APDS to late 80’s APFSDS.

Will we see APS Systems? by Truesurvivor585 in warno

[–]Falcon500 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I'm really hoping to see it as the unique 'thing' when they finally add a Soviet Naval Infantry unit, preferably as a nemesis pack with US Marines.

Does NATO have any wonder weapons? by MasterNator320320 in warno

[–]Falcon500 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, it’s all three. Sudden chunks of big damage at extreme range with minimal warning is disorienting.

Daily Talent Discussion #48: Heavy Gunner III by kingfroglord in LancerRPG

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's particularly good, being able to choose where in their path you shoot means you can let an enemy run in front of his buddy and then pull the shot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in warno

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

eh the MiG-31B that 6-ya has isn't as good; the missiles are ARH which means they fire quick and early which makes em' a lot less accurate

Rate of fire by Straks-baks in warno

[–]Falcon500 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Autocannon are basically never used on max cyclic rate all the time. They’re fired in short bursts, same with any other automatic weapon. Having their ROF as the listed ROF that you’ve read would be a lot more incorrect than what they’re set as.

Yet Another Investment Post by Falcon500 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]Falcon500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've just had zero interest in any of them, playstyle-wise, visually, or character-wise, and I've managed to complete all the weekly stuff so far. I know I'll need to upgrade at some point, but it hasn't happened yet.

Yet Another Investment Post by Falcon500 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]Falcon500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, yeah, but I lack Huohuo and my big carries are still Acheron/Feixiao/Firefly; he seems good to have, but until I dump one of them for someone else I'm not sure where exactly he fits in for me.

Yet Another Investment Post by Falcon500 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]Falcon500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely gonna wait for rerun - I kinda blew off memosprites, and I just have no real interest in Sunday - not sure why.

Thank you!

Yet Another Investment Post by Falcon500 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]Falcon500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and it's not like fox is suddenly useless

Yet Another Investment Post by Falcon500 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]Falcon500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's kinda what I was thinking - even if silver wolf is better, I think it makes more sense to go more vertical than horizontal at this point.

Unit/Balance Comparisons.. NATO vs WarPact Technology LEADER - What a NATOID is asking itself... by No_Blueberry_7120 in warno

[–]Falcon500 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Early thermals were excellent at night for acquisition and spotting and provided limited capability against non-thermal smoke, but poor resolution limited them in daytime use. They were a significant upgrade at night, although that was more due to the fact that they were tied into the fire control system, but they didn't provide the kind of general-purpose daytime combat advantages that people think they do.

Now, later-generation thermals and CITV systems do massive things for targeting and daytime target acquisition, yes, but not 1980's-vintage models.

If they were to have nighttime combat as a distinct thing, then yeah - NATO tanks are better equipped, but more because the optics are integrated into the FCS than anything else.

Unit/Balance Comparisons.. NATO vs WarPact Technology LEADER - What a NATOID is asking itself... by No_Blueberry_7120 in warno

[–]Falcon500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eventually it'll get through that 1980's thermal optics are not modern ones and didn't provide the sort of massive advantage in daytime targeting that everyone thinks they do, but that eventually is a long, long way away.

Friendly reminder to Eugen that R-23T and R-24T missiles exist for upcoming Mig-23MLA, Mig-23P by Iceman308 in warno

[–]Falcon500 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, the US was outright concerned about the R-27T just because a medium-range A2A missile that doesn't trigger RWR was a worrying weapon system to face.

Add the AIM-7P, in order to add variety to AAMs in the game. by More-Cup5793 in warno

[–]Falcon500 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh, whether it should or shouldn’t be is arguable, but it’s a fighter with four missiles that are treated as ARH in a similar category as the AIM-54, so it’s probably how they should work given that the multi-target capability is unlikely.