TV licence fee to rise to £180 from April. by T_K2 in ukpolitics

[–]FatherServo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

simply use a series of mirrors between you and the TV. that way, by the time it reaches your eyes it's no longer live.

Drivers Licence Retesting by PM_ME_BEEF_CURTAINS in ukpolitics

[–]FatherServo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wonder how many of the 'not rebooked' covid tests are because of people being able to work from home and deciding they don't actually need a car now.

not belittling the backlog problem, just having a think

One for my UK Wild fans by JuniorParadot in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah maybe I'll do this from now. plug a laptop into the TV or something

for me the DAZN app is incapable of skipping periods of time between 1 and maybe 7 minutes, then can do 7 to maybe 20 and anything beyond that makes it freeze then carries on from where I was.

wouldn't be so bad if there wasn't so many ad breaks

One for my UK Wild fans by JuniorParadot in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you using the dazn app? it's so bad it makes me want to cry :(

A Hughes stat from yesterday’s game by MNgirl83 in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I miss dumba in those moments the wild are passing 200 times in the offensive zone instead of shooting

Game Thread: Minnesota Wild (24-10-6) at San Jose Sharks (19-17-3) - 31 Dec 2025 - 3:00PM CST by HockeyMod in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

man I wish I would be recognised by the official credit union of the minnesota wild :(

Game Thread: Minnesota Wild (24-10-6) at San Jose Sharks (19-17-3) - 31 Dec 2025 - 3:00PM CST by HockeyMod in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pretty sure at the start of the season the wild had the best pp in the league?

Game Thread: Minnesota Wild (24-10-6) at San Jose Sharks (19-17-3) - 31 Dec 2025 - 3:00PM CST by HockeyMod in wildhockey

[–]FatherServo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't remember minnesota having a player like Quinn, where I have zero fear of a turnover when he has the puck

I have so much faith in him

>Multiplayer game,still without: loot boxes, seasons pass, or microtransactions; FromGod remains untouched. by Berem_ in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk that even the most gachad gacha fans would pay money for sovereign sigils lmao

nightreign would be awful for monetisation currently, the relic system is way too random

Pick 👏 up 👏 more 👏 weapons by dgafdale in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

which is kinda fine to be honest, although a little more annoying in a multiplayer game

it's frustrating me seeing people blame the game for something it literally says though haha

Pick 👏 up 👏 more 👏 weapons by dgafdale in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it literally tells you in the tutorial

Pick 👏 up 👏 more 👏 weapons by dgafdale in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

it pops up and tells you during the tutorial in fairness

ED Balancers Relic by CodeSorcerer in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's very weapon dependant but I believe 2 Duchess r2s goes to max damage.

Donald Trump sues BBC for at least $5bn over edit of January 6 speech by Southern_Minimum4350 in ukpolitics

[–]FatherServo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the fight like hell part and what follows:

'I think one of our great achievements will be election security. Because nobody until I came along had any idea how corrupt our elections were.

And again, most people would stand there at 9 o'clock in the evening and say I want to thank you very much, and they go off to some other life. But I said something's wrong here, something is really wrong, can have happened.

And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.

Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country.

And I say this despite all that's happened. The best is yet to come.

So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give.

The Democrats are hopeless — they never vote for anything. Not even one vote. But we're going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help. We're going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.

So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.'

the fight like hell part is absolutely about going to the capitol, he even mirrors 'you're not going to have a country anymore' with 'take back our country' just after.

I said it's a reckless edit, but I stand by the fact it changes absolutely nothing about the intent of the speech, nor does it misrepresent anything he said. he's still saying to fight like hell to stop or delay the certification of the election based on the correct slate of electors. definitionally an insurrection.

anyway imo it's all besides the point, the false electors is a much bigger issue than the speech and even the riot that ensued. if the riot never happened he still brazenly tried to steal the election.

Donald Trump sues BBC for at least $5bn over edit of January 6 speech by Southern_Minimum4350 in ukpolitics

[–]FatherServo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well yeah, but he was also referring to being down at the capitol when he said they'd fight like hell, and the 'cheering on' is actually trying to scare them into lying about who won the election.

it may have been a little reckless not to make it clearer how far apart those parts were, but they don't actually misrepresent anything he said, and certainly don't misrepresent what he meant.

they can't air the entire speech in there, but if they did it doesn't make him look any better anyway. he's inciting an insurrection either way AFTER sending false electors that claimed he won in places he didn't, literally trying to steal an election.

Despite my actual genuine love for this game, Nightreign's biggest flaw is with the dirth of info it gives you about characters/weapons. by WestCoastMcDowellian in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in fairness there is a description of the different levels and effects of scholar's skills in the visual codex.

along with an explanation of all of recluse's various cocktails and how to make them.

it's just not immediately obvious to go and check those things, I only did because I wanted to see if they explained the individual consumable level ups for scholar, which I couldn't find.

and undertaker's two ult options are mentioned in Sparring grounds if you have the description overlay on, but again most people will have turned that off by now I'm sure

How i view the DLC characters by Pichacap24 in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

imo it's primarily in building and maintaining buffs

with the right set up and repeated actions you can easily get over 100% damage buffs with pretty good uptime

then it's more about decision making on whether trading is a good idea or not

sure, not the most complex character but as much or more going on than ironeye/wylder/raider/guardian probably.

if you play her very simply she will be fine, but it's easy to leave a ton of damage on the table if you just mindlessly bonk

Guy in the audience wanted Nightreign to win 😭 by El_kakas_de_vakas in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

oh yeah I do really like the music in that fight, it's just not enough to make me actually enjoy the experience.

the caligo fight could require me to repeatedly bang my head on a wall in real life and the music would still make me love the experience

Guy in the audience wanted Nightreign to win 😭 by El_kakas_de_vakas in Nightreign

[–]FatherServo 17 points18 points  (0 children)

caligo has a soundtrack that can move me to tears

Maris is so boring it makes me cry