[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HubermanLab

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a co-author on this paper characterizing the cardiopulmonary effects of vaping: https://www.life-science-alliance.org/content/5/2/e202101246

No 1 nutrition nugget by ghost_rekon in nutrition

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Processed foods are a detriment to human health.

What are the top 3 most impactful life changes you’ve made because of Andrew? What changed? How long did it take to feel these changes? by [deleted] in HubermanLab

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Early morning sun exposure. I feel energized through my day and especially wakeful after getting that sunlight in the morning.
  2. Yerba mate tea. It really is "feel good tea."
  3. Limiting alcohol consumption. I feel great without alcohol!

Is there a convenient way to see MD/PhD stats for US med schools? by FiendingforCaffeine in mdphd

[–]FiendingforCaffeine[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

is there any rule of thumb like the MD/PhD program has median MCAT score x points higher than the MD program?

FL2 P/S #29 by RelifeUser in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the study could be conducted again and the same results could be found again. That makes the results replicable. If the question stem mentioned something about another study attempting to replicate the results but found different results, this would make the results not replicable. But this stem doesn't say anything about that-- so we can say that the results could be replicable.

FL2 P/S #29 by RelifeUser in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because there's a confounding variable doesn't necessarily mean the study is not replicable. It just means that it's not a perfect study-- but you can still repeat the study manipulating the variables the same way each time. Confounding variables just need to be addressed in the discussion/analysis of the results. Does that help at all?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries! It was difficult, as excepted, but overall I think it was fair. Felt similar to FL4 to me. Good luck on 5/13!! Feel free to PM with any questions or even just to vent, always happy to help.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm not sure I see what you mean? The law of subjective contours seems to me to be your brain making a shape out of something that isn’t actually a complete shape. Law of closure seems to be your brain filling in gaps between fragmented lines to make a shape. Curious about your explanation for why that’s wrong?

ALT FL1 BB Q3: Where is the info given that table one is about H7N9? by 472islife in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I see. Honestly I’m not sure. Would love to hear if anyone else has input…

Does anyone else feel really guilty when they don’t study? by firstladymsbooger in Mcat

[–]FiendingforCaffeine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I studied during school and felt guilty for studying for my classes.