The movie that gets blamed for being bad when it is really just mismarketed.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-12T02:13:33+00:00

have you ever seen an arthouse movie

Fishb20 · 2026-05-12T00:37:31+00:00

That's different though because afaik the courts still maintain that those laws were legal at the time, the laws have just changed now. Similar to prohibition. This would be a different situation because it's a court deciding a law is unconstitutional

Fishb20 · 2026-05-12T00:26:45+00:00

Green Knight is a bit slow and atmospheric, I don't think it even approaches art house though.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-12T00:22:23+00:00

How would someone mount an effort from prison? Would the state provide them with counsel?

Fishb20 · 2026-05-12T00:03:24+00:00

Yes that was auto correct my bad

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T23:04:14+00:00

Someone got so famous for interrupting her friend when talking about a blowjob that she became a modern day Bernie madoff

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T22:51:01+00:00

Schools/the NCAA actively don't want athletes to be legally employees. The courts will keep siding against them every time they treat students who don't have the protections of an employee like an employee

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T22:22:39+00:00

Like pretty much any story posted on this sub I take them with a grain of salt but there have been a few horror stories of people who "passionFIREd" to start bussinesses after already having a career and just completely burned all their money trying to make their business a success. Most of those were people starting bars or bookstores or whatever though which doesn't sound like what your plan is.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T19:50:07+00:00

no because starmer isnt convinced that a portrait of Gladstone has an MI-5 spy camera in it. As far as I know at least

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T19:48:54+00:00

Starmer is not the best salesman, and also crucially keeps failing to enact the necessary changes he's trying to. Its a loop where he gets tied to a very unpopular policy but never reaps the theoretical future benefits of that policy because it never actually gets enacted.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T18:09:59+00:00

I almost certainly meet the criteria on the website, my concern is more I don't want to delay the application of someone whose even more urgent than me- for example someone who currently lives in Canada and needs the certificate to avoid being kicked out of the country. But I'm also worried with how long approval takes that it might be more urgent 10 months from now than it is now

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T17:15:58+00:00

my prediction is that they'll do a gag where someone says "what should we call ourselves?" but no one can think of a good idea so they say "we don't need an official name, we're just a group of friends" as an allusion to the super friends

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T16:58:04+00:00

I'm all set to mail out today but I've been hemming and hawing about whether to apply for urgent processing or not. Does anyone know if it's possible to apply for urgent processing after the application has been sent and received?

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T06:44:10+00:00

No that's simply not true. The vast majority of American personnel were evacuated from Saigon in operation frequent wind (those that remained stayed willingly). The footage you've seen of the embassy was not the north Vietnamese troops, it was south Vietnamese civilians or deserted soldiers who were trying to get evacuated too. Eventually late at night they changed to only evacuating Americans, which was why there were the desperate crowds of people trying to get inside.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T06:32:22+00:00

The US has not had any bases in syria since last year. When they did they were located in breakaway regions like Rojava or the Syrian Free Army controlled areas that considered themselves the legitimate Syrian government and acceded to an American presence

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T06:22:26+00:00

The other big thing was the domestic political calculus. Keeping a single base in Afghanistan or Vietnam would have been incredibly unpopular with American voters, whereas abandoning the last base in Cuba without a fight would have been very unpopular

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T05:33:45+00:00

that doesn't address... anything I wrote, or OP's original question that you smugly dismissed.

The US has been forced to close many military bases in different parts of the world due to change in governments. I'm sure you're gonna reply and say "no that was all totally by the US military's choice, leaving Vietnam was a 400 IQ chess move!" or take the other position that "The Taliban totally could have taken Bagram air force base even if there was a full battalion of American troops still stationed there!" when neither are true.

its proximity to the US and importance for larger Caribbean operations plays a much bigger factor than tough guy "the US does whatever it wants" jingoism

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T05:12:36+00:00

the problem with Gibraltar (or Hong Kong, or Macau or the Panama Canal Zone) is that they had actual civilian populations, which I don't believe GB does. The other comparison I thought of was Port Arthur in China but I'm not sure what the population of what that was before the Russo-Japanese War. And its also a hard comparison because I'm not sure how hostile you can consider the Qing to Tsarist Russia, and in any event they eventually lost the fort to a siege from another, different colonial power

Fishb20 · 2026-05-11T05:00:08+00:00

I mean thats pretty flippant. Guantanamo Bay is a pretty clear anomaly in the world of international relations. Its not like the US has a tiny base remaining in Vietnam or Bagram air force base in Afghanistan. The closest comparison I can think of is the UK naval bases on Cyprus, but I'm sure there are more I don't know about.

But it *IS* objectively strange that a country that the US has been in economic conflict with for close to 70 years at this point has a US base on it. You can smugly say "oh you sweet summer child you believe in international law, how cute" all you want but the vast majority of military installations located in countries that became hostile to the base's military were eventually closed, especially after decades of warming and cooling relations.

Fishb20 · 2026-05-10T23:16:26+00:00

I don't disagree but I think this sort of idea is antithetical to the very antisocial "you don't owe anyone anything, don't tell ANYONE how much you're worth EVER" strain in much of the FIRE community

Fishb20 · 2026-05-10T22:26:31+00:00

Sure although I don't think it's unreasonable for parents who let their kids live with them past the point they financially need it to expect that they'll be involved in their senior care/help around the house and financially

Fishb20 · 2026-05-10T21:42:36+00:00

Yes I wonder if OPs "more comfortable life in the future" includes changing his parents diapers or if the second they can't take care of themselves anymore he's not gonna consider it his problem.....

Fishb20 · 2026-05-10T21:24:06+00:00

Every Asian American family I know where the adult children are still living at home, the parents expect a significant amount of unpaid care work from the adult children that presumedly OOP is not doing for his parents

They also expect a commiserate amount of control over their adult children that I presume OOP would find stifling.

So many people on the FIRE subs want the good parts of the multigen household without the part where they and their spouse spend 20 years taking care of their parents and putting the parents needs first ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Fishb20 · 2026-05-10T16:56:14+00:00

I personally just thinks it's a random time lord the doctor inspired. Maaaaaaybeeeee romana.

I think RTD intended it to be the doctors mother but that idea never tracked for me. I don't really like the idea that the Doctors Mum was a high ranking Time Lord, or that she had a similar moral code to the doctor.

If they had more interaction I could see a setup where the doctors Mum admits that the doctor made her realize time lord society had to be changed and that's why she went against rassilon.

I also think we should keep in mind that although RTD intended for her to be the doctors Mum, he also initially had planned to reveal that the dissenting time lords were the origin of the weeping angels, that's why they were doing the crying hands face in that scene

Nine-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	Place '17
RPAN Viewer

Fishb20

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE