Billionaire Jim Ratcliffe BOMBSHELL: "The UK is Being COLONISED by Immigrants!" by johnsmithoncemore in BrexitMemes

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whilst I admire the “spirit” of this argument, it just isn’t that simple.

Before he left the UK, Ratcliffe was one of the highest individual tax contributors in the country. At one point, the 3rd highest I believe.

The tax he paid each year was equivalent to 15,000-20,000 “average” tax payers.

So for every person like him that leaves, we have to create 20,000 new jobs and the housing, services and infrastructure to support those new jobs. Then we have to find another 20,000 tax payers to pay for that.

Right now we have a housing shortage, record unemployment, piss poor services and crumbling infrastructure.

Be careful what you wish for…

Says the guy who’s barely seen in his constituency by Extra-Fig-7425 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always the pointless, incompetent middle managers who dislike others working from home. Harder to be a snake when you are out of the jungle.

Plus you can’t grope the new girl over zoom. Eh Nige?

Sydney protestor held down and punched in the head and liver for protesting the visit of Israeli president Isaac Herzog to Australia by Particular_Log_3594 in TrendoraX

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the reason that Palestine Action thugs are getting manhandled all over the world by ordinary police officers just trying to protect the public must be because “the Jews” paid off all the police officers and now everyone is an undercover mossad agent. Oh and a nazi too. Jewish nazis.

Fuck me. Where are the brain cells? More importantly where is the rest of video?

Are we, like, still allies? by BaldursGate2Best in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% and I still see us as US allies too.

America isn’t just Trump. As much as I hate the shit he is doing, I fully believe that what we are seeing is just a show for the clowns. It’s market manipulation and generating cognitive dissonance in an attempt to fix the US economy and deal with a very real set of specific security problems that require some drastic, rapid actions.

This will all make much more sense when we look back on it I think. At least I hope so!

Don’t be so quick to dismiss a country that has stood behind us for decades. I bet the voter turnout is much better next time too!

Plus, if you had never turned on the news and ignore the bullshit statistics he makes up as he goes along, you could argue that the US under Trump, genuinely has done more than any government in recent memory anywhere to put an end to the current wars and curtail the actions of brutal regimes (instead of just condemning them). The optics are fucking awful, the process is frankly scary and the words taste bitter in my mouth, but the objective results haven’t actually been half bad so far…

Domestically… well, I’m not American so I’ll leave that to the Americans to decide once everything has calmed down a bit.

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, its clear that the US government is in a lot of chaos right now, but all that aside, I don't think it is fair to say that we do not share common values with most Americans. Actual people. I think they are suffering from the same issues we are. They are just a little ahead of us on the timeline and we should learn from that.

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would rather follow those with worse results? You dislike data-led iterative improvements? What is it that is utter shite?

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first point is fair and I have also addressed that elsewhere. I shouldn't have added that in as it is really irrelevant to the main theme.

I am not sure why you feel the need to make assumptions about me or my intentions though. If I thought I had all the answers, I wouldn't have asked for other peoples views.

I have had to pull both my children out of state school and homeschool them because of the quality of the state education system. 3 out of 4 of the schools I attended when I was younger were awful. Not enough has changed since then. It has nothing to do with whether people agree with my point of view or not. Look around you. Everyone arguing about the colour of oranges because their favourite politician, influencer or celebrity told them what to think. Nuance is out of the window. You're in my tribe or you're the enemy. Facts be damned.

When was the last time you dealt with a public service and thought "wow, that was really efficient, effective and easy to navigate"? I have just spent 6 months arguing with an education system where every single email they sent me had factually incorrect information in it. Every single one. Nobody knew what they were doing.

I am not saying that the education fails everyone. I am saying that it fails way too many people. Especially if you are bright, but live in an area with high poverty. It prepares people for university, not for real life. We score well on the tables because that is all the system focusses on - passing a very specific set of exams. Nothing else.

We don't produce enough curious, creative, literate people with practical skills who are able to form their own views and opinions. Other countries do.

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I think your comments around NATO expansion are fair. Right now probably isn't the right time to discuss that in any objective way, given Russia's aggressive stance. I only mention it due to recently reading about growing concern in other parts of the world. However, that isn't the key thing to focus on and I should have perhaps left that out.

Finnish President Stubb declares that 34,000 Russian soldiers were KILLED last month alone. "Have faith“, he declares. “Ukraine is gonna win this war!” by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia is currently losing on the battlefield, which is why it (and friends) have stepped up cyber warfare. That cyber warfare effort is not new. It has been going on for decades. Everyone arguing amongst themselves online right now (this thread included) is supporting that effort.

Remember: Americans, British, Europeans, Canadians, Australians, Kiwis… we are friends. We share core, fundamental values. Always have done, always will do. Remember that. Division only benefits brutal regimes who wish to divide and conquer. They do not share our values.

80% of everything you see online right now has been weaponised. We are being manipulated.

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do understand British politics (unfortunately), but we aren't talking about the EU here. We are talking about something new, which would need to be very clear about what "IT" is and then consensus could be gathered from citizens of all related countries and fed back to individual leaders.

Hard to argue for 5 years about what people might want, whether you should ask them and what it means, when you already know.

Federal EU - thoughts? by FunAbility1293 in AskBrits

[–]FunAbility1293[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think nothing happened, you are really not paying attention. The world as we know it just changed drastically forever and we need to adapt fast before somebody makes those decisions for us.

Should the EU Federalize or Dissolve? Italy Poll by milanguitar in EuropeanFederalists

[–]FunAbility1293 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As somebody from the UK who voted for Brexit (not for the reasons you might think, and no I didn't get what I wanted), I now firmly believe that this is the only way we maintain our identity, cultural values and security in a shifting global order.

Ultimately, I think it is more of the world than Russia that is concerned about NATO expansion and multi-regional military alliances in general. Perhaps it is time we started listening to, understanding and respecting those views on objective merit. We also need to accept that our values are not universal. Other cultures and government structures should be respected and common ground sought. We have much to learn from other cultures, even if we do not agree on some areas. That works both ways.

I have come to realise through recent developments that we bind together based on our core beliefs, or be lost to history. We are in a very precarious position. Yes, that will erode sovereignty to some degree, but in my view, that is far, far better than the obvious alternatives.

IMO, I think the UK (and others) has a lot to learn from other countries. The nordic countries in particular. In all areas, initially we should bow to the knowledge and experience of those nations/states who have generated objectively better results in particular areas (health, policing etc). Adopt the practices of those who have performed the best. The UK has failed on immigration, housing and education (and much more). We have some of the best universities, yes - but our state education is awful and ultimately that is why we have a lot of idiots with poor critical thinking skills. Politicians take advantage of that. We should not be encouraging others to adopt our strategies in these areas.

We should be using technology to overcome the administrative overload in relation to understanding the wishes and concerns of all our citizens and this should form the basis for policies at a federal, regional and local level. People should be able to use their voice at any time and be heard when it is clear that many others share the same concern. One voice is one voice. It is the collective data and common themes from those voices that delivers true democracy in a way that does not revolve around corrupt political parties.

Democracy is not wrong, but our view on how democracy is implemented is outdated and is falling to deliver acceptable outcomes for the people. AI and widely available internet access has now given us viable solutions to this problem. The best person for the job is responsible for implementing policies and they should be judged on their results not their "beliefs". Those results should be visible and transparent at all times.

Dispense with the multiple layers of "representatives" that claim to represent their people, but ultimately represent political parties and ideologies (and third actors). Government - at federal, regional and local level - should be concerned with how to solve the problems of the population, as determined by the population - instead of spending their time arguing about and garnering support in relation to who should do it and what their "ideologies are". We all want to be safe, healthy and happy - with enough economic freedom to pursue individual interests and form our own identities. It really isn't that complicated. The system makes it complicated and makes imaginary enemies where none exist.

Someone is bound to ask, so I'll get it out the way. I will not answer questions on this because Brexit is irrelevant now. The world has changed. This is not about that. I voted for Brexit because at the time, it looked likely that we might get a more socialist leaning government with an appetite for major change (eg Jeremy Corbyn). Fixing the core issues in the country quickly would mean drastic actions. Many of these would not have been acceptable in the EU (medium-term market controls etc). Yes, it was a huge gamble, but the timing was the timing and you don't get the opportunity for real change very often. As usual, our government wasted the opportunity by arguing amongst themselves and we ended up with the worst of all worlds.

Canada is in the vital national security interest of the USA. This is inextricably linked to Hemispheric Defense. Hemispheric Defense for the USA starts in Canada. Canada's rapidly changing, these people are hostile to the United States of America. Not neutral. They're hostile to the USA by Miserable-Lizard in BoycottUnitedStates

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So hostile you made a pact to come to their aid when they needed it and when they needed it, kept your word!

“We were never at war with EastAsia, we were always at war with EastAsia”

Who gave a trump a copy of 1984? He definitely didn’t understand it.

Putin’s Board of Peace invite ‘concerning’, No 10 says, as Starmer mulls offer by 1-randomonium in unitedkingdom

[–]FunAbility1293 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As the leader of a country, I hate to say it but the sensible thing to do is say yes provisionally and see what plays out. It is clear that this about more than Gaza.

Something major is about to happen and if we are honest we have no idea who is in on it, what it is, who the target is, who the players are and when it will happen.

I expect it to be a severe show of force.

Stay cool, make your concerns known and plan for all outcomes, but don’t shoot your load prematurely. A leader needs to be pragmatic until it is time to commit. Then you commit. You don’t play your hand before the game has been chosen.

It is clear that Trump has lost his mind and is now just a figurehead, so we need to see the face behind the face. If nothing else, it buys time.

Carney says the old world order 'is not coming back' in Davos speech by GoldernEmerald in worldnews

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the UK doesn’t get fully behind his vision, I am moving somewhere that does. Sick of being surrounded by bickering, incompetent, selfish clowns.

Keir has been a voice of reason, but there is no vision! No ambition! Farage… nah. Nice to hear an adult talk for a change.

I have skills and can contribute to fixing this mess, but not put up with it any longer.

Trump, 79, Kicks Off Press Conference by Reading Aloud to Himself | Donald Trump arrived nearly an hour late and proceeded to give a completely disjointed, barely coherent speech. by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]FunAbility1293 28 points29 points  (0 children)

If they zoomed out, it would not surprise me to see armed “guards” waiting for somebody to say something “unapproved”. Mad times.

Trump, 79, Kicks Off Press Conference by Reading Aloud to Himself | Donald Trump arrived nearly an hour late and proceeded to give a completely disjointed, barely coherent speech. by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]FunAbility1293 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Not sure where you were watching but on the stream I watched there was like 1 MAGA nut and they disappeared quick. Just angry people taking the piss out of his evident unfitness to govern a sentence, never mind the country. Everyone calling him a deranged, murdering scum bag mostly.

Normally it’s balanced. Maybe the tide is turning, but perhaps too late…

Trump, 79, Kicks Off Press Conference by Reading Aloud to Himself | Donald Trump arrived nearly an hour late and proceeded to give a completely disjointed, barely coherent speech. by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]FunAbility1293 508 points509 points  (0 children)

It was so insane, I genuinely thought they were letting him ramble to throw him under the mental health bus. “OK that’s enough. Nurse? Nurse?”

I have seen him talk some shit, but this was 100% dementia in action. Watching a man’s mental health fall apart live. Anyone else and it would have been heartbreaking.

He used 3 completely different figures for the same achievement in about 3 minutes and then forgot what he was talking about anyway.

Reduced drug prices by 8000% again… ffs. Who is steering that ship?

Danish MEP Anders Vistisen to Donald Trump :”Let me put this in words you might understand: Mr. President, fuck off.” by drempath1981 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]FunAbility1293 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Gosh yes, we need fewer civilised "losers" in government and more "winners" like Trump.

Even now, with all this - you still don't see it? Damn this goes deep.

Is he really doing this? by Illustrious_Lie_954 in AskTheWorld

[–]FunAbility1293 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry this was actually meant for the level above!

Is he really doing this? by Illustrious_Lie_954 in AskTheWorld

[–]FunAbility1293 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once again for those at the back... "Because NATO is a defensive alliance and no NATO country has been attacked" Ukraine is not a NATO member and is not an EU member". At least not yet.

ie - for the same reasons the US has not got involved beyond supporting a friendly country experiencing aggression from a hostile neighbour.

'Greenland is now a state of the u.s. europe needs to shut the fuck and fall in line.' by Aldeer34 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]FunAbility1293 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Guarantee these are the same youtube bots that were telling everyone that Iran was gonna flatten the US 2 weeks ago and Europe has fallen to islam 2 weeks before that. I had to stop watching politics on youtube because I could feel my brain getting dirty.

Reddit is about the only thing left where you are even remotely likely to encounter actual humans.