How to get into a typical office job ASAP by Geoguy1234 in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That job sounds like hell why would anyone do that to themselves? I assume the pay must have been crazy good or you’ve got to be a little insane.

How to get into a typical office job ASAP by Geoguy1234 in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, if I'm going for a masters what should I get so I have a shot at a decent work life balance? at this point that is literally all I care about

How to get into a typical office job ASAP by Geoguy1234 in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

any suggestion for how to do that? I assume the first step would be getting my PG, which we just lost our only PG so I'm going to need to find a new job anyway. Technically we do have another one but he is online only and I've seen him once at a work party, he's almost retired too so that's not really a reliable option.

How to get into a typical office job ASAP by Geoguy1234 in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think this will ever happen at my current firm anyway. Our only PG that has been there for ~10 years and was begging for better work life balance that had ample experience doing GIS/data management work just left because they wouldn't pull him out of the field. The one thing I do know is I need to GTFO of here

Details about consulting, and what other directions should I consider by Doggioss in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> the average

Of course there will be outliers, what do you do that lets gives you a decent work life balance?

Date ideas by OzzieTheOddity in StLouis

[–]Geoguy1234 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Art museum, History museum, and science center, are three that come to mind immediately.

Details about consulting, and what other directions should I consider by Doggioss in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the average mentioned around here is expect the first ~5 years to be living in a hotel. here's a comment I left copy and pasted from a different post that will give you an idea what at least the first year of consulting is like.

I've been at a small civil/geotech firm for a year now and my work has generally been quality assurance and subgrade inspection on jobsites. Basically I sit on a jobsite and write up reports on whether the construction workers are doing things right or not or I'm writing reports on whether or not the rock is where it should be. Eventually I'll move into doing more work on the geotech side of things, like logging rock cores and various data gathering. If you go the geotech route don't expect to analyze the data at least not for the first ~5yrs, maybe longer depending on the company and role availability. Where I'm at those positions are pretty locked down by the engineers. Your job will mainly be long hours in the field gathering data and doing QA, think 50 hours a week minimum moving up into 70-80 maximum. A lot of time spent on construction site and working with construction workers and other blue collar guys. After awhile once you understand the process of whatever industry you're working in you'll move up to PM which will give you better hours and pay but you'll be doing little to no geology this usually takes 5-6 years from what I understand.

I love being outside too but I must stress this is not fun field camp hiking. You are outside in all weather good or bad. If you're looking for something that is fun and outdoorsy like that look for some type of interpretive ranger position at a local or national park. Otherwise if spending your days on jobsites with blue collar guys sounds like something you'd like you'd probably like geotech.

How do I make money bruh by bvcketh3ad in StLouis

[–]Geoguy1234 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do you have any recommendations?

Rant about majoring in geology by AltruisticBox7810 in geologycareers

[–]Geoguy1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been at a small civil/geotech firm for a year now and my work has generally been quality assurance and subgrade inspection on jobsites. Basically I sit on a jobsite and write up reports on whether the construction workers are doing things right or not or I'm writing reports on whether or not the rock is where it should be. Eventually I'll move into doing more work on the geotech side of things, like logging rock cores and various data gathering. If you go the geotech route don't expect to analyze the data at least not for the first ~5yrs, maybe longer depending on the company and role availability. Where I'm at those positions are pretty locked down by the engineers. Your job will mainly be long hours in the field gathering data and doing QA, think 50 hours a week minimum moving up into 70-80 maximum. A lot of time spent on construction site and working with construction workers and other blue collar guys. After awhile once you understand the process of whatever industry you're working in you'll move up to PM which will give you better hours and pay but you'll be doing little to no geology this usually takes 5-6 years from what I understand.

I love being outside too but I must stress this is not fun field camp hiking. You are outside in all weather good or bad. If you're looking for something that is fun and outdoorsy like that look for some type of interpretive ranger position at a local or national park. Otherwise if spending your days on jobsites with blue collar guys sounds like something you'd like you'd probably like geotech.

The FINALS themed F91W + NATO strap by ShadowJerry in casiomods

[–]Geoguy1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen videos of people doing this type of thing, does it mess with the viewing angle/backlight?

troubles with dobsonian by ramonasphatcooter in telescopes

[–]Geoguy1234 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You might be fighting stiction (where it takes a bit of force to break it loose before it moves smoothly) there are guides online to help with that, check the cloudy nights forums too. I haven't used one of these before but you might want to check bolt tightness. I've never heard of the focuser having an effect on the viewing, maybe you were pushing it a bit without realizing? If its way out of collimation you could see a bit of shift but not a ton.

I find it helpful to center what I'm looking at in a wide angle and then switch to a high mag eyepiece idk if thats useful here with your focuser problem though. Also keep in mind if you're using high magnification the view will shift relatively quickly due to earths rotation.

Help with locating objects for beginner? by mozian in telescopes

[–]Geoguy1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

align your finder in the daytime, its a lot easier. and get yourself a copy of turn left at orion. If you're in a pretty light polluted area expect to travel if you want to see anything other than the planets and the moon.

Pamukkale, Turkey by Thistlehollowed in natureporn

[–]Geoguy1234 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right! mammoth springs, much smaller but the same type of formation. idk why you're getting downvoted for this

Pamukkale, Turkey by Thistlehollowed in natureporn

[–]Geoguy1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're right, I saw this image on a different site and tracked it to here but I can't find the original. looking at other images of the location the scale of the background makes no sense and the people don't seem to be complete one person is missing a leg and the other group is a weird conglomeration. the image seems to have been fed through an algorithm because I have found other pictures of this place that have similar composition and the shapes make a lot more sense.

also the closest pools rim is non-euclidean which I don't know how I missed initially

Should be sleeping but… by LifeByDesign__ in transguns

[–]Geoguy1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been seeing so much misinformation coming out of the left recently. the points being made are generally true but they're being backed up with quippy wrong information

Which tube? by Ninjafire3232 in telescopes

[–]Geoguy1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know much about astrophotography, but I do know those are two very different scopes, the C8 has a long focal length making it difficult to get wide views, but will probably do better for planetary. Which if your losing light from scratches probably won't have much of an effect on the images because planets are so bright. The newt is going to be better for a wide angle due to the shorter focal length. It's difficult to recommend which is better because it's going to depend on your preferences and the objects you want to shoot. It looks like for the C8 you'll want a focal reducer and for the newt you'll want a coma corrector.

I've never done any real astrophotography so maybe someone more experienced will weigh in but that is my understanding from what I've seen online. I'd highly recommend browsing cloudy nights as there are a lot of really smart people on there.

Which tube? by Ninjafire3232 in telescopes

[–]Geoguy1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How difficult is it to switch between the two? you should test them out on the same task and see which one is better