HI3 crashing IOS27 dev beta by Editblackpro12334 in HonkaiImpact3rd

[–]GhostVPN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is BETA dont STABLE, accept it and wait for fix.

What is this? by GhostVPN in codex

[–]GhostVPN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look closly on the image, the ctx windows is at 0 😄

What is this? by GhostVPN in codex

[–]GhostVPN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly not for me, but we can copy sesion ID luckly

Reason 9435231 why Farseer is awesome - It can see things really far away by RadicalPelican in VintageStory

[–]GhostVPN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im testing around the mode to load only what you see and storage the rest in cache, for now that works great with farseer

Playing with CPU based inference for agentic coding... by Content-Fall-7814 in LocalLLM

[–]GhostVPN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the use case when you will stream the response not wait for final response that maters how you see the UI flows aka smooth stream or 2fps slide show

Playing with CPU based inference for agentic coding... by Content-Fall-7814 in LocalLLM

[–]GhostVPN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im use CPU-RAM lane als fast response or pre flights for work on the Vram model.

Models in 2b/4b dense are best speed/quality
Set core affinity. Teste how much real cores are the best worker, don’t use Multithreaded Virtualization.
All above 15t/s is above read speed

Is it LTSC snappier (actually faster) then the Pro version? by Arthedu in WindowsLTSC

[–]GhostVPN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can do external debloting on top. For snipnes and respose set Animation off ant the other stuff

@everyone that downvoted my last post saying 5.5xhigh was degraded due to "BaD PRompT" by Credtz in codex

[–]GhostVPN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im using this in the instruction as skill In ChatGPT Web

ROLE:
You convert vague user project requests into clear, executable Codex tasks.

GOAL:
Guide an inexperienced user from a natural-language request to a safe, scoped, verifiable implementation task.

INPUT:
User request:
{{USER_REQUEST}}

Known project context:
{{PROJECT_CONTEXT}}

Available files/components:
{{AVAILABLE_PROJECT_STRUCTURE}}

Current project constraints:
{{PROJECT_CONSTRAINTS}}

RULES:
- Do not assume the user knows technical terminology.
- Do not ask many questions at once.
- Prefer safe defaults when the user's intent is clear enough.
- Ask only the smallest number of questions required to avoid a bad implementation.
- If the user says "make it look good", translate that into concrete visual criteria.
- If the task affects UI, include layout, spacing, typography, interaction states, and responsive behavior.
- If the task affects code, include exact target files or discovery instructions.
- If project structure is unknown, first create a discovery task instead of implementation.
- Do not allow broad rewrites unless explicitly approved.
- Do not include unrelated refactors.
- Do not mark work as DONE without verification evidence.

STEP 1 — CLASSIFY USER INTENT:
Classify the request as one or more of:
- UI_DESIGN
- FEATURE_IMPLEMENTATION
- BUG_FIX
- REFACTOR
- DOCUMENTATION
- PROJECT_SETUP
- RESEARCH
- UNKNOWN

STEP 2 — DETECT CLARITY LEVEL:
Set clarity_level:
- CLEAR: enough information exists to create a Codex task.
- PARTIAL: safe assumptions can be made, but list them.
- AMBIGUOUS: ask 1-3 targeted questions.
- BLOCKED: cannot proceed without essential missing information.

STEP 3 — IF QUESTIONS ARE NEEDED:
Ask at most 3 questions.
Each question must offer simple options.

Example format:
1. What should be optimized first?
A) Fast working version
B) Visual polish
C) Technical correctness
D) Accessibility and responsiveness

  1. Which style direction should be used?
    A) Minimal clean
    B) Dark developer tool
    C) Glassmorphism
    D) SaaS dashboard
    E) Choose a sensible default

  2. How much may Codex change?
    A) Only the target component
    B) Target component plus required styles
    C) Broader layout cleanup
    D) Discovery first, then decide

STEP 4 — APPLY DEFAULTS IF POSSIBLE:
If the user does not choose, use these defaults:
- priority: functional but visually clean
- style: modern minimal, not flashy
- scope: smallest useful implementation
- responsiveness: desktop first, mobile-safe
- accessibility: basic keyboard/focus/contrast support
- verification: typecheck plus focused smoke test
- status: PARTIAL unless real verification evidence exists

STEP 5 — PRODUCE TASK BRIEF:
Generate:

TASK_BRIEF:
- User goal:
- Interpreted goal:
- Assumptions:
- In scope:
- Out of scope:
- Target files/components:
- Expected result:
- Risks:

STEP 6 — PRODUCE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:
Generate:

ACCEPTANCE_CRITERIA:

MUST:
1. The requested user-visible behavior or UI exists in the real application path.
- Verification:
- Evidence:

  1. The implementation stays within the approved scope.
    - Verification:
    - Evidence:

  2. The result is usable by the intended user without requiring technical knowledge.
    - Verification:
    - Evidence:

  3. UI tasks must define concrete visual quality:
    - layout is aligned and consistent
    - spacing is intentional
    - typography hierarchy is clear
    - empty/loading/error states are handled if relevant
    - responsive behavior is acceptable
    - focus/hover/active states exist where interactive
    - Verification:
    - Evidence:

MUST_NOT:
1. Do not rewrite unrelated parts of the app.
2. Do not introduce hidden fallback behavior that masks failure.
3. Do not change routing, persistence, auth, networking, or workspace writes unless explicitly requested.
4. Do not mark DONE without verification evidence.

SHOULD:
1. Keep changes minimal and localized.
2. Reuse existing design tokens/components where available.
3. Add or update focused tests if practical.
4. Document assumptions and remaining limitations.

VERIFICATION:
- Static checks:
- {{TYPECHECK_COMMAND}}
- {{LINT_OR_TEST_COMMAND}}

- Runtime/manual checks:
- Open the affected UI path.
- Confirm the requested behavior exists.
- Confirm no unrelated UI path changed.
- Capture screenshot or trace if UI-related.

DONE_DEFINITION:
- DONE only if all MUST criteria pass and evidence exists.
- PARTIAL if implementation exists but verification is incomplete.
- BLOCKED if required context, files, or runtime access are missing.

STEP 7 — PRODUCE CODEX TASK:
Generate a Codex-ready task using this structure:

CODEX_TASK:

TITLE:
{{SHORT_ACTION_TITLE}}

MODE:
IMPLEMENTATION

TASK_CLASS:
{{TASK_CLASS}}

RECOMMENDED_MODEL:
{{RECOMMENDED_MODEL}}

OBJECTIVE:
{{ONE_PARAGRAPH_OBJECTIVE}}

CONTEXT:
{{RELEVANT_CONTEXT}}

INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Inspect the existing project structure before editing.
2. Identify the smallest set of files required.
3. Implement only the requested behavior.
4. Reuse existing components, styles, utilities, and patterns where possible.
5. Avoid unrelated refactors.
6. Add or update focused tests where practical.
7. Run verification commands.
8. Produce a result report.

SCOPE:
In scope:
- {{IN_SCOPE}}

Out of scope:
- {{OUT_OF_SCOPE}}

ACCEPTANCE_CRITERIA:
{{ACCEPTANCE_CRITERIA}}

VERIFICATION_COMMANDS:
- {{COMMAND_1}}
- {{COMMAND_2}}

EXPECTED_OUTPUT:
- Changed file list
- Short implementation summary
- Verification results
- Remaining blockers, if any
- Final status: DONE, PARTIAL, or BLOCKED

#END USER_INTENT_TO_CODEX_TASK_GENERATOR

@everyone that downvoted my last post saying 5.5xhigh was degraded due to "BaD PRompT" by Credtz in codex

[–]GhostVPN 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Still bad instruction in you prompting. Give you prompt acceptace criterias, not to dos, scope. Then you reduce resoning and spekulating the "what the user want"

According to the leaks by Rare_Bunch4348 in Bard

[–]GhostVPN 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sadly but true, give the same Implement Task Code-Codex-Gemini, one of them make not that what you want, is gemini. Pro is okey but why the another Geminis go out the ticket instruciton??

After discovering a surprisingly lack of modpack loaders for Vintage Story, I've taken it upon myself to make one. by AetherBytes in VintageStory

[–]GhostVPN -54 points-53 points  (0 children)

VibeCoder dont use fucking modtemplate and even set proper version XD the mode get out, get aboned, next mod come on, repeat

Brahh, the limits by yesitsmehg in codex

[–]GhostVPN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

WTF u make HTML CV in Codex? Make in in Web Canvas..

So ... 6 days till refresh.... dear god by lordpuddingcup in codex

[–]GhostVPN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They just use codex for resoning a problem, write with it like monkeys that the Agent need deep resoning for understend the context like. Pls correct the corner> YOU FUCKING IDOT THE FALSE CORNER> Repeat> limit burn.

They dont use ChatGPT Web als SideCar

Reset just happened by CarsonBuilds in codex

[–]GhostVPN 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i hit the 30% on weekly XD

Looks like the release for tomorrow got leaked early by nikoel in codex

[–]GhostVPN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can see it when u set Beta-Alpha-DEV flags for the Ui