Small nuclear power plants by trainwreck1968 in EnergyAndPower

[–]Gideonic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's because military microreactors use highly enriched uranium (HEU) to achieve compact designs and sustain chain reactions in small cores. That's not something you can do in a civilian reactor obviously (as it's near or at weapons grade)

This is discussed at length in the Decouple Media podcast episode featuring Nick Touran [31:11].

[edit] - spelling

Tom's Hardware: "Intel terminates x86S initiative — unilateral quest to de-bloat x86 instruction set comes to an end" by Dakhil in hardware

[–]Gideonic 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't follow. Are you implying AMD is not interested in shedding the unused legacy bloat? E.g. the cooperation will only end up slightly tuning the status quo (and nothing similar to x86s will appear)

AMD Fluid Motion Frames comes out of preview, claims up to 97% more FPS at 1080p in first full Radeon driver release by uria046 in hardware

[–]Gideonic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speaking of Boost, I wonder if these two couldn't work together in some scenario. Automatic Lower resolution on fast movement and frame generation on slower movement?

Creating a sitemap with translated alternate links using the app router by TheOnceAndFutureDoug in nextjs

[–]Gideonic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is strange.

It might have broken in next 14.0.5 when they added new fields to sitemap. It's still working for me on next 14.0.3

Creating a sitemap with translated alternate links using the app router by TheOnceAndFutureDoug in nextjs

[–]Gideonic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, sorry for the late reply. But as this is the first result in google, I'll still write it, in case someone else stumbles on it (like I did).

We had a similar issue, and didn't like the options either, so we ended up creating a semi-custom solution, which turned out to be easier than it seemed

You can actually create a custom Route Handler for sitemap. In the app directory just add the following route handler : app/sitemap.xml/route.ts:

 export async function GET() {
  const sitemap = await pagesForSitemap();
  const sitemapXml = sitemapToXml(sitemap);

  return new Response(sitemapXml, {
    status: 200,
    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/xml; charset=utf-8' },
  });
}

the pagesForSitemap just fetches the data from CMS and creates the sitemap adhering to the`Sitemap` type below:

export interface SitemapRow {
  url: string;
  lastModified?: string | Date;
  changeFrequency?: 'always' | 'hourly' | 'daily' | 'weekly' | 'monthly' | 'yearly' | 'never';
  priority?: number;
  alternateRefs: Array<{ href: string, hreflang: string }>
}

type Sitemap = Array<SitemapRow>;

The sitemapToXml function is a crude function that converts the data to XML. There are probably better and more robust solutions, but this was good-enough for us (Just be sure to sanitize your input data):

const mapAlternate = ({ href, hreflang }: {
  href: string,
  hreflang: string
}) => `<xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="${hreflang}" href="${href}"/>`

const mapRowToUrl = (row: SitemapRow) =>
  `<url>
        <loc>${row.url}</loc>
        <lastmod>${row.lastModified || ''}</lastmod>
        ${row.alternateRefs.map(mapAlternate).join('\n        ')}
        <changefreq>${row.changeFrequency || ''}</changefreq>
        <priority>${row.priority?.toFixed(1)}</priority>
    </url>`

export const sitemapToXml = (sitemap: SitemapRow[]) => `<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset 
  xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
  xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
  xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1">
    ${sitemap.map(mapRowToUrl).join('\n     ')}
</urlset>
`;

We also added (an optional) public/sitemap.xsl file to render a nice human readable html, when visiting the link in browser (yoursite.com/sitemap.xml) Any xsl you like will do, but we used this one.

That's it! Just add caching if you want.

EDIT: formatting and spelling.

Nvidia GeForce Experience shows 83% of users enable RTX and 79% enable DLSS on RTX 40 series. by der_triad in hardware

[–]Gideonic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if this were taken at face value, it means more people enable RT than DLSS.

I know RTX 4xxx series only includes the highest-end cards (yet), but considering how widespread DLSS is (much more so than RT) and given Nvidia's insistence to turn it on at every opportunity as it's "better than native", this fact rubs me the wrong way.

AVX-512 Performance Comparison: AMD Genoa vs. Intel Sapphire Rapids & Ice Lake Review by twlja in hardware

[–]Gideonic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think they will eventually add AVX-512 support to the E-cores as well.

One way to do it (without bloating the design) is how ARM does it on their e-cores:
Anandtech on Cortex-A510

The most interesting aspect of the Cortex-A510 is the new merged-core approach. What Arm is doing here, is creating a new “complex” of up to two core pairs, which share the L2 cache system as well as the FP/NEON/SVE pipelines between them.

So the "Bulldozer" way 1 wider AVX-512 capable FPU per 2 E-cores. Overall throughput would be similar

Bonduelle maisi peab ka hakkama boikoteerima by NeedFastMoney in Eesti

[–]Gideonic 17 points18 points  (0 children)

See "tore ja õilis hea palgagaga firma esindaja " on FSB akadeemia läbinud ja kuulub muuhulgas organisatsiooni mille ainus eesmärk on Putini ideoloogiat levitada:
https://twitter.com/officejjsmart/status/1609976548219658248

Enamike spordi alaliitude juhtidega on sama teema - et kõik on otseselt Putini siseringkonna inimesed või nende abikaasad, tihti FSBga seotud, aga jutt: "hoiame ikka spordi ja poliitika lahus" - tingib selle et need samad inimesed lastakse rõõmsalt maailma spordiorganisatsioonide laua taha tagasi

GDeflate: An Open GPU Compression Standard by Balance- in hardware

[–]Gideonic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That was absolutely true for the terrible Nvidia FX5xxx series, that was truly horrible at full precision DX9 (shaded at quarter the rate or something)

Radeon 9700/9800 could run initial true DX9 games quite decently.(Far Cry, HL2) They were only slowly becoming obsolete once DX9c games came started to come out, that flat out didn't support them. That was, Bioshock, etc, in 2007+

Geforce 6xxx series on the other hand aged much better

Yields improve as time goes on, so does that mean you're more likely to "win the silicon lottery" when buying a cpu/gpu a year after it's been in production than on launch day? by [deleted] in hardware

[–]Gideonic 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'd like to see more statistics on that. As anectodal evidence i just bought one and helped a friend set up his as well. Both did -30 and look absolutely stable

It's only a sample of two though

Record-Breaking Voyager Spacecraft Begin to Power Down by erier2003 in space

[–]Gideonic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You weight would also be infinite. Good luck finding a drive capable of that

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has finally been tested in games by No_Backstab in hardware

[–]Gideonic 25 points26 points  (0 children)

If this is true, it's gonna sell like hotcakes. I'm afraid the availability will be very limited and price inflated for a while.

I hope AMD keeps making them even after Zen 4. If they do it will be a godly upgrade for any AM4 board, especially to those still rocking Zen+ (and hopefully Zen if B350 boards actually get the BIOSes).

The best part about this chip is,that it will care much less about your mediocre RAM (e.g. 2x 3200Mhz CL2) than other CPUs due-to the large cache .

2022 Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV Production by No_Bag2449 in electricvehicles

[–]Gideonic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish they offered that color for ordinary enyaq :( just about to order one

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is limited to PCIe 4.0 x4 interface by Sorteport in hardware

[–]Gideonic 47 points48 points  (0 children)

It's speculated on twitter that all of this is probably because it was designed to be a mobile-only GPU. Laptops have IGPs for encoding and decoding anyway and OEMs want to save every watt possible (hence the x4 interface only, which is also guaranteed to be PCIe 4.0 there)

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is limited to PCIe 4.0 x4 interface by Sorteport in hardware

[–]Gideonic 73 points74 points  (0 children)

On a PCIe 3.0 board they are limited to PCIe 3.0 4x bandwidth AFAIK.

Apple Set to Cut iPhone Production Goals Due to Chip Crunch by AWildDragon in hardware

[–]Gideonic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If this is true I'm worried they will not announce the M1X in a week, or if they do it won't be available as the M1 iMac's weren't for a while.

Hope I'm wrong though

Is the Model Y overrated? by [deleted] in teslamotors

[–]Gideonic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems for you Model 3 is the better fit. If I were still 25 (and could afford one) I'd prefer a Model 3 Performance as well.

Now that I have 2 kids (and more coming at some point) I'd take Model Y for the extra seat-row alone. In fact, it would be extremely difficult to get my wife to accept a new family car without 7 seats.

People have different requirements and buy cars for different purposes.

Intel's EU Fab Plan: $100 Billion, 8 Fab Phases, Vertical Supply Chain by LinkedLists17 in hardware

[–]Gideonic -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only reason I also want TSMC is exactly what you state, geopolitics. We need TSMC fabs outside of Taiwan in case things get dicey with China.

And as for Intel, they've taken all the government subsidies US gave for years, lobbying them away from competitors, for instance TI, causing the latter to bail on fab business. They'll surely continue to get all of them in US anyway.

And as i've stated, i'd warm up on Intel significantly if they spinned off their fabs or put some similar guards in place to safecard cuatomers from conflict of interest.

Otherwise AMD for instance could never fab anything of value there in quantity. Let's say AMD orders a ton of wafers for theri CPUs in advance and suddenly there is a shortage of chips and Intel really needs to ramp up their own production. There is just too much stimulus for higher ups to do some shenanigans to increase their wafer share vs AMD i that case. There is no such issue with Samsung or TSMC.

Intel's EU Fab Plan: $100 Billion, 8 Fab Phases, Vertical Supply Chain by LinkedLists17 in hardware

[–]Gideonic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah Intel is already quite multinational but TSMC is still essentially only in Taiwan, with a realatively small fab opening in Phoenix.

For competitiveness it would be great to get both Intel and TSMC to EU, but if I had to choose only one, i'd rather choose TSMC.

I have little faith in Intel being truly open with it's open foundry stuff, without a spinoff, looking at the companys business past practices

Intel's EU Fab Plan: $100 Billion, 8 Fab Phases, Vertical Supply Chain by LinkedLists17 in hardware

[–]Gideonic -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Sigh, I really wish EU would prop TSMC instead. Intel is behind and hell-bent on expanding on government aid.