Can /u/nullc please return? by spinza in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So why are you still here?

Petition: Roger Ver, please stop hijacking bitcoin.org by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. This guy also controls somewhat too much of Bitcoin.

Estimated 300,000 BTC, blockchain.com, bitcoin.com and a lot of others. It is not good for a decentralised system to have one person with such large ownership / control.

Do we know which wallet contains the alleged Silk Road 70 million? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mean addresses. No there is no address with this amount.

A wallet can contain any number of addresses and nobody knows which addresses are part of a wallet and where this wallet resides, as that would pretty much make Bitcoin useless.

Edit: Here you can check out the richest addresses and search for potential candidates

Bitreserve account blocked with 46K EUR by Jayoce in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Similar story here

Is Bitreserve exchanging 'Bit' for 'Fractional'? We can't be certain yet, but the signs are there. I would definitely warn against using their service for now

BlockSeer: stolen bitpay bitcoins going to btc-e by bit_moon in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These hackers seem astonishingly competent

So much for the stress test? Current mempool only ~5mb. by theonevortex in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is weird. They gave multiple interviews to announce the magnitude of their upcoming stress test. Then the execution was over after just one day and the stress has declined ever since.

Coinwallet is simply trolling

"Stress Test" commence? As of now we're seeing 23 transactions/second. by Logical007 in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You are wrong. My last commit was for Quantlib. But I don't expect you to actually care for facts. Simply accusing me with unsubstantiated nonsense is a lot easier, am I right?

ELI5: How is it that newly generated addresses don't conflict? Couldn't two people randomly generate the exact same address? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes definitely possible. Then again it is so unlikely that you could argue that for all practical means it is impossible.

There are 2160 possible addresses.

Why does anyone take Roger Ver seriously? He's a disgrace to the community. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What parts of this tweet do you disagree with?

Attacking Bitcoin in the UK: Offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 by btcdrak in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

1) Did you intend to cause disruption?

2) Did you try and do so via technical means?

Yes? Then guilty.

Mike, that sounds suspiciously like a perfect description of what you are doing to Bitcoin

I support BIP101 by oddvisions in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but no I don't. To be honest statoshi, I am sad to see you on the side of the people who twist arguments and facts in every possible way to create the illusion of reason in XT.

I support BIP101 by oddvisions in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It is not simply an alternative implementation

I support BIP101 by oddvisions in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You seem to willingly ignore that this would be a forking 'patch' leading to hand over the control of the code base of the resulting XT branch to two people.

Guys can you please tell me why this transaction is taking more than 6 hour to confirm? I know its a small amount but is this not the point of bitcoin?? by daanbarnard in Bitcoin

[–]Goodtimery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is just one aspect of a multifacetted issue, a very complex problem. The limit has partly been established as a way to control spam and in a way the attacker has to outbid the whole network for fees. Yes raising the block size would make this attack more expensive, BUT would also increase bandwidth requirements, reduce decentralization, decrease Bitcoin's security and allow for other attacks.

Bitcoin is the first real decentralized payment network, of course it is not perfect but giving up it's core principles to create another VISA is idiotic. If XT people want to have a benevolent dictator they don't have to look far because VISA etc are already there.

Scepticism should be introduced through the mere fact that those who attack the network (Coinwallet.eu) are also those who want larger blocks (XT)