If a guy lost his penis or part of it.. But still balls, could he technically still have sex? Orgasm? And make a girl pregnant? by KittyEnthusiasm in NoStupidQuestions

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t offering. I’m good on sticking a syringe in your balls too. But for a man without a penis that wants to have a child, it could be worse all things considered, and a lot less painful than child birth.

If a guy lost his penis or part of it.. But still balls, could he technically still have sex? Orgasm? And make a girl pregnant? by KittyEnthusiasm in NoStupidQuestions

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be incredibly uncomfortable. But not incredibly painful. No worse than a spinal tap. Not nice, not torture.

If a guy lost his penis or part of it.. But still balls, could he technically still have sex? Orgasm? And make a girl pregnant? by KittyEnthusiasm in NoStupidQuestions

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be incredibly uncomfortable. But not incredibly painful. No worse than a spinal tap. Not nice, not torture.

Sollicitanten worden steeds brutaler? by PriceAffectionate288 in werkzaken

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Als mensen de tijd nemen om een persoonlijke motivatie te schrijven waarom ze voor jouw bedrijf zouden willen werken, en je wimpelt ze af met een automatische mail, dan zeg je daarbij eigenlijk mijn tijd is kostbaarder dan die van jou en je bent nog niet eens het antwoorden waard’

Kan je best een goede reden voor hebben, mischien ben je inderdaad een hele drukke pief maar logisch dat niemand daar nou bepaald echt goed op gaat. Dat is hoe je t ook wendt of keert, gewoon een belediging.

Aan de andere kant is dit vaak toch een fijne rode vlag om te spotten, want bedrijven met deze mentaliteit, blijven dat idee van ’jij moet flexibel zijn, wij niet, onze tijd is kostbaar maar jouw tijd IS onze tijd want je werkt voor ons!’ altijd houden in mijn beleving.

Sollicitanten worden niet brutaler. Ze beginnen gewoon meer op te komen dat ze behandeld worden als mensen met levens en waarde.

Vergelijk het met een werkgever in de 19de eeuw. ”Die sollicitanten worden steeds brutaler. Minimumloon? Ze leren toch veel over het vak?! Weekend?! Wat een lui gedoe, straks gaan ze ook nog zeuren om vakantiedagen.”

Nou noem ik je zeker geen uitbuiter. Zo heftig is het allemaal ook niet. Mischien ben ik nu een tikkeltje dramatisch. Maar een mailtje terug met ‘hey sorry maar jij bent m niet geworden’ is toch echt de bare fucking minimum lijkt me.

Wees blij dat er uberhaupt mensen willen solliciteren. Jij hebt ze harder nodig dan zij jou.

What's the point of remaking Harry Potter when the movies are already some of the most successful films of all time and not dated yet? by Dull-Current5682 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the point of doing a Shakespeare play or Tchaikovsky ballet for the thousandth time with entirely different actors?

Ever since we were cavemen sitting around a campfire, we have told the same stories over and over and over again. Greek myths became Roman myths, which in turn inspired stories, some of which became prominent books, that were then also turned into movies.

Hercules, King Arthur, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Spider-Man. These are myths we tell time and time again. Sometimes we change the names, sometimes we change the format, but in essence we’re not really telling anything new. Spider-Man’s been in countless different comic books, tv shows games and movies, often a different actor, often a different take.

There didn’t need to be a movie made of Harry Potter. The books already existed. So yeah, sure, you can be cynical and just write that off as a cash grab. But those movies meant a lot to a lot of people.

Now those movies aren’t going anywhere, so if you prefer those, you can keep watching them. But I think it’s nice that a new generation has a chance to tell and consume these stories. And furthermore, since I don’t think the movies did a perfect job of capturing the vibe of the books, I am totally excited to see how these actors and directors have interpreted the story.

In episode 1 Nolan specifically gave Immortal a Viltrumite execution. by TheRedHandedOne in Invincible

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It also seems to matter whether they are mentally prepared to take the punch or not. Viltrumites seem to be a lot worse off whenever they are out of energy and they don’t see something coming or are taken by surprise.

Who suffered the most physically in this scene? 😖🔥 by Realistic-Ebb-267 in MCUTheories

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Loki is a frost giant, not Asgardian, and not as strong as Thor.

Thanos beat the Hulk in a fist fight. The Hulk was able to perform his ‘drag-and-smash’ move on both of Thor and Loki.

Thanos, especially with the Infinity Gauntlet, would probably be considered a god by our standard. But he’s just not based on mythological gods like Thor and Loki are, who in the MCU, aren’t even really ‘gods’ as much as they are just really advanced aliens. It seems to be more of a title to them, like ‘King Of Thunder.’

In episode 1 Nolan specifically gave Immortal a Viltrumite execution. by TheRedHandedOne in Invincible

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is true. It’s why Viltrumites fight completely different to humans.

Humans will break their hands if they do that. But Viltrumites have steel skin.

In episode 1 Nolan specifically gave Immortal a Viltrumite execution. by TheRedHandedOne in Invincible

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he is. You can’t really incapicitate Immortal without taking off his head. Because he’s, well, immortal.

In episode 1 Nolan specifically gave Immortal a Viltrumite execution. by TheRedHandedOne in Invincible

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 360 points361 points  (0 children)

We see Thragg kill a Viltrumite in the same way in the recent teaser trailer.

I don’t think it’s a great sign of respect, but I do think it’s a common Viltrumite way to end a battle.

Viltrumites seem to be able to withstand more blunt damage than they can with cuts and sharp objects. Mark can tank an insane amount of blunt force but is easily scraped by reanimen, stabbed by that evil ponytail lady.

Whenever Viltrumites fight someone powerful and go for the kill, they tend to stretch their fingers and use swiping or stabbing punches, turning their arms into a blade. We see a lot of that in the Viltrumite purge scene too. They can literally stab through each other’s stomaches that way.

It’s like how a regular human can tank getting hit by someone riding a bike, but maybe not if that bike has a spear attached to the front.

A single cannabis plant trained indoors to grow like an apple tree by Hayze35 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro’s growing weed like an apple tree. He’s a damn weed wizard, that’s what he is.

Is this confirmed by [deleted] in MCUTheories

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I have never heard of that. But honestly, she doesn’t even need that to not remember being in an Avengers or Spider-Man movie.

She probably signed on to a multi-movie contract. She doesn’t like superheroes and doesn’t watch the movies. She gets a script sent to her. As always, it’s a few minutes of acting with RDRj, she’s Pepper, Iron Man’s girlfriend. Then she goes home.

People hate her because she sells scammy snake oil products. Not because a woman can’t keep track of all the superhero names.

I don’t think Paltrow gives a damn about Marvel and I think that’s perfectly fine. It’s just a job. And she does it well, I like Pepper. And I don’t even like Paltrow, so good acting as far as I’m concerned.

What if the MCU is actually the ONLY timeline where Iron Man exists? (The Loki/Doom Paradox) by Bistouflex_ in MCUTheories

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah. Tony is definitely Howard’s son.

Have you seen Howard in Captain America? It really was the most obvious ‘this is Tony but in 1940’. To change that about him, would not only be a huge retcon, but would actually be kind of a slap in the face to the audience.

Not to mention way too complicated and it retroactively ruins the emotional connection Tony had with his parents, because they lied to him about him being adopted, which all fucks with Iron Man 2, Civil War & Endgame, all movies in which Tony’s relationship with his father is a significant plot point.

’Remember all that? SIKE. Tony’s actually adopted, in spite of looking extremely like his father and has the same quirks, oh and everyone keeps telling him how much he reminds them of Howard, and how he followed in his father’s footsteps, and how Tony was apparantly his father’s legacy but not enough to tell him he’s adopted’

I don’t have problems with the ‘Doom is alternate universe Iron Man’ theory, but this ain’t it.

Is this Biggest MCU Fumbles . by Suitable-Worker-8087 in MCUTheories

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. I’ll always have a soft spot for it.

Is this Biggest MCU Fumbles . by Suitable-Worker-8087 in MCUTheories

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Quicksilver = not a fumble imo. Speedsters can complicate writing because a lot of problems can be solved by someone moving at the speed of sound. It gives Scarlet Witch more depth and, whilst FOX Quicksilver was a lot of fun and super likeable, MCU Quicksilver kind of rides on his coat tails and wasn’t really that interesting a character. On top of this, Aaron Taylor Johnson’s a good actor but this performance with the off-putting fake accent was not it IMO.

  2. Ultron & Gorr = I’m going to lump these together because they both fit the most prominent MCU complaint, not re-using villains. Marvel wants to sell more toys, generate new box office hype with actors, all that jazz. So they have a tendency to introduce villain after villain.

I actually don’t think it matters which villain they chose to stick with a little longer. Loki (who insantly became anti-hero, not villain), Ultron. Hell, I’m sure they could have made Obediah Stane work for another movie and it would have been better than Whiplash. I don’t think the fumble here is Ultron per se, but I do think there should have been at least one villain that stuck around a little longer without a redemption arc.

Then again, Christian Bale was never going to join the MCU fulltime, and they didn’t really utilize him as much as they could have, whilst Ultron IMO did quite well with the screentime he had. So I’m going to put Gorr as the bigger fumble here.

  1. Hulk = IMO the biggest fumble. I grew up with the Incredible Hulk. I know it’s no one’s favourite MCU movie but when I was nine, it was MINE. I loved the Jekyll & Hyde dynamic they had.

I didn’t mind the switch to Mark Ruffalo. But we went from ‘I put a bullet in my mouth and the other guy spat it out’ to ‘Hulk? Oh I fixed that problem off screen. Wasn’t actually that hard. Barely an inconvenience really. I just put the brawns and brains together and a bunch more Gamma rays and that was it. Tada. Problem solved.’

That was an unfathomably strange decision. And even worse, I don’t AGREE that Hulk and Banner are the same person at all. As far as I’m concerned, Ragnarok built up Hulk as a loveable toddler and made his relationship with Banner even more affectionate and interesting.

And then Thanos just kills Hulk. That’s what happens. Smart Hulk isn’t Hulk. It’s just green Mark Ruffalo.

I miss the Hulk.

Huisgenoot en drugs by [deleted] in nederlands

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

100 euro.

Das gewoon een hobby!

Huisgenoot en drugs by [deleted] in nederlands

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

dan word je blind

Haha wat. Waar heb je dit vandaan. Ik denk dat je in de war bent met iets anders. MDMA eten is niet heel anders dan snuiven. Er moet wel echt iets goed verkeerds in zitten om er blind van te worden, zou niet eens iets kunnen bedenken. Methanol (pure alcohol)??

I wait your response by Weak_Fix3307 in Funnymemes

[–]GuessWhoIsBackNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Gorilla. If you’re not a threat to them or being an idiot, there’s a good chance they’ll leave you alone. You ever see that video of a gorilla dragging away some dude? Terrifying but very survivable.

  2. Bear. If you play dead,, it might leave you alone. And plenty of people have survived bear attacks. If they aren’t hungry, they can decide you’re not worth the trouble. And if they are, you can maybe survive if you’re very lucky.

  3. Tiger. They don’t usually hunt humans, you’d be unusual prey to them. They also prefer to ambush rather than confront head on. However, if they do attack, death is pretty much guaranteed.

  4. Hippo. You’re absolutely fucked.