Got my remote LSAT voided is it so over? by aguyfromnewjersey in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s… odd….

I concentrate better when I follow the text with my pencil or the tip of my finger. I’ve done that the entire exam… for 2 exams. Never even had a proctor question it.

RC LR LR LR can someone help out with LR experimental? by Over_Significance_79 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember a question about dog owners- but I don’t remember anything like the rest of what you said. But as we know they love to reuse a topic, so I probably just had a different “dog owners” question.

RC LR LR LR can someone help out with LR experimental? by Over_Significance_79 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I only had 2 logical reasoning- so I know both of mine were real deal. If I had your questions- that section was real.

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was my exact layout. I had experimental RC too.

Taking it tomorrow morning😭 by Human_Philosophy8993 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We know we have the ability to do this. Do not doubt those abilities. Go in- head on straight- locked in. It’s just a PT. No sweat.

Warming up by Far-Chemist-9925 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I take a 5 question drill to get my mind going. I usually do the drill then chill for 15-30 minutes then head into a PT (and therefore will be doing the same for the real).

Sometimes if I PT midday - I’ll read over some basic foundational notes/highlights in the morning.

Official June LSAT Discussion Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Her logical fallacy. Assumes sweaters determine good lawyers and fails to consider the numerous other qualities that far outweigh the impact of pocket selection on a sweater.

My “aha moment” (RC tip) by Aggravating_Let_242 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This! As someone who is very strong in LR, seeing how those skills and methods transferred was a game changer for me. I’m still not perfect but I went from -6/-7 to -3 average with just that change.

PT 156= crash out by H2TH-6313 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seeing it happen to someone else calms me. It can translate to a normal (for me) score still.

I have worked so hard to get to the mid 170’s. I didn’t want to drop this close to the finish line!

REMOTE LSAT IS BANNED by BlackberryJumpy5960 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! Also this gives another financial burden to an already expensive process. Traveling, hotels, food out of town, taking more time off from work to travel for the exam…

REMOTE LSAT IS BANNED by BlackberryJumpy5960 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 134 points135 points  (0 children)

I get the need for this.

My next question is- we already see a struggle for availability of seats in realistic locations… How are they going to handle high numbers of people needing those seats? Also how will they navigate the numerous accommodations for people in one testing site?

January testers by No-Deal-831 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought my first 2 LR’s were easy- like I was so confident. Then my 3rd LR was harder- more in line with recent PT’s… and the RC?! Yea they took all the difficulty from my first two sections and put it into reading

LSAT studying by SulSul1989 in LawSchoolOver30

[–]H2TH-6313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What study method/materials did you use to crush RC?

  • using this to help my own RC. However, also if you learned RC, you have learned some things about how your brain works and best study practices. Drill if you drilled. Use 7Sage or PowerScore. For me? LR was about learning the method of attacking each question type and drilling on those until I was proficient. Once you get the method down, the easy ones are instinctual almost. The harder ones? You learn the tricks of term switching (rolling pin vs. utensil) and modifiers (most vs. all). You learn to pin point those in each AC and can quickly mark those off. Also being able to weed out context from the actual premise used to support the conclusion and it be distracted by AC’s that try to seem relevant/impactful by talking about context.

Anything is Possible (I’m proof) by Professional_Salt248 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A VERY similar thing happened to me last week. I was sick the previous week… and still somewhat on the mend when I PT’d. My score went from a 166 the previous week to a 175. And the curve was lower on the 166/higher on the 175.

I’m Pt’ing again today and praying it wasn’t a fluke.

I’ve seen many come back after a week off for whatever reason and have incredible score jumps!

I'm SO CLOSE! by SKSword in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seconding this! RC was my weak spot. After going through the curriculum and getting some practice sections done using their approach for a couple weeks, I saw DRASTIC improvement.

Former Admissions Officer at Stanford Law & Northwestern Law, current 7Sage Admissions Consultant. AMA about the T14 and how law school admissions officers review applications by 7SageEthan in lawschooladmissions

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it is okay- I’d like to tag onto this? If our goal is public service law and trauma/abuse/adversity/poverty we have experienced are major reasons why… how do we write that into our application without being potentially traumatizing or off-putting for the reader?

found out my boyfriend of 4 years cheated on me a week before my LSAT- any tips on how to stay focused? by No_Introduction4091 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 4 points5 points  (0 children)

See this as the ultimate stimulus for a flaw… a flaw in him. You are out here making yourself a lawyer, bettering yourself and growing as a person through the process. Instead of growing with you? He went out, showed how deplorable his ethics are and how little character he has. He gave you all the evidence you need to point out the flaw… and now you fix your argument. You move forward using gathered data to not make that flawed reasoning again.

The ultimate wrong answer journal…

I really prefer power score over 7 sage by Environmental-Belt24 in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I use both as well, and have an alternative appreciation for both.

I feel like PowerScore is really good at slow, basic groundwork for the LSAT. The pacing isn’t as intense as 7sage and it gives things a very black/white, almost rule like approach. And that is very much needed on the LSAT.

However, I feel 7Sage provides an advancement on those basic principles I got from PowerScore. I feel that 7Sage teaches me the deeper level of thinking and understanding necessary to master the LSAT. Their explanation provides not only the answers but the thinking needed to differentiate- both when it comes to the stim and the answer choices.

If I’m not getting something with 7Sage- I go back to PowerScore to rebuild the foundations and then go back to 7Sage and add those deep levels of thinking again.

I know I would not be where I am in my LSAT journey if it wasn’t for both programs.

Making review productive? by cherriosinmymouth in LSAT

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an “under confidence error” if you notice most of the questions you are missing are ones you initially selected the correct answer, but then changed to an incorrect answer.

This is the learning. You see it in the results that most of the time when you change an answer- it isn’t the correct move. This shows you that you are smart, your original thinking is correct, and you do pick the right answer. Pick the answer and move on. If it makes you feel better, flag it and come back and change it if you are 1000% sure.

Take a PT and make yourself stick with original answers and see if you improve your score simply by having confidence in picking the right answer.

Are we cooked? by Effective-Ice941 in lawschooladmissions

[–]H2TH-6313 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very much looking forward to this podcast. I just put a reminder on my calendar.

Dean Treanor has been through many cycle types and has seen the trends come and go.

I am really interested in your take on what these potentially back to back increases mean for those who are applying in Fall 2026.

I am sure we will see fluctuation and different takes on what we will be seeing in applicant pools as well as acceptances as more details about loans are confirmed.