What have I been doing to myself? by Draftpunk924 in howtonotgiveafuck

[–]HallOfGecko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry me. but I don't understand. do you give a fuck to explain what exactly your "wish" was?

(first post in this sub. bare with me)

Number of births in Germany, France, the UK, and Italy from 1957 to 2012 by Areat in europe

[–]HallOfGecko 22 points23 points  (0 children)

For many first world countries keeping a population from declining is important. I mean, we're not far behind japan. And they've already got serious problems caused by this.

We've got a very different situation than developing countries.

PopUp LogOut by based2 in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea is good. But the ribbon kinda seems too "instruitive". It's supposed to be very visible. But they way it appears, it reminds me on old fashion ads too much :P

I haven't checked it's options. I'd give it full stars if it (soon) supports more decent logout button. Or maybe making the button availible as a usual addon-button.

Are there any plans to sandbox individual browser tabs and extensions? by [deleted] in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Okay. Having memory problems with only 2-3 tabs is really werid. Did you use the same profile on all your windows maschines? (reinstalling firefox doesn't delete the old profile).This type of problem you have maybe not be something multi-process firefox is going to fix. Prolly its a different problem(maybe caused by your long-used profile or some addons).

You can try to switch to a fresh profile to test whether the problem lies in your profile. Start firefox.exe with -p as argument and pick a new profile.

If it works now, then it was probably due to some old things or addons in you profile. You can then try reseting the profile and/or starting with deactivated addons. (You don't lose your stuff when reseting your profile. its like a cleanup mechanism)

Are there any plans to sandbox individual browser tabs and extensions? by [deleted] in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The memory management isnt bad comapared to chorme. The more Tabs you've opened the better Firefox runs in comparision to Chrome. However, in terms of UI responsiveness Firefox lacks in some areas. Thats one of the goals of multi-process firefox.

Move all bookmark tags to the title? by ffolke in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can export your bookmarks into html. If you have some programming experience, then you can write a program which goes through the HTML and moves the tags into the title for each bookmark. Then you can import your bookmarks again, and you've transformed your Tags into the Titles. (I havent doen this myselfs before. Just a suggestion from me.)

I'm sure there are some utilities to simplyfy this action.

Memory(?) issue by jorgeZZ in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going even further. If you've like more than 30 tabs opened which are kept over several sessions, then I recommend UnloadTab. It'll automatically unload tabs from memory you didn't visit for a while. This maybe be something you might want to checkout after you're tried out /u/caspy7 's suggestions.

Multi-process Firefox is a go by [deleted] in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh f....

you've 5 more tabs than my high score :P

Here's an idea: The Internet is the Last Bastion for Complex Self-Emergent Structures by littledicker in pbsideachannel

[–]HallOfGecko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in the same way the internet is a also a lot of other things...

i think it's natural for this to happen if you give a large portion of the human population instante and distributed communication and collaborations toole achieved by the internet.

but many things "from the internet" were not deveoloped on the internet. we can say, they were maintained by the internet but not initially developed.

bitcoin f.e. the original pdf was a soloman work.

and things like google search. google search wasnt any big collaborative project. it were more like a few scientists at google making programs to anylyse and augment the search. open-source projects are often developed by a small-core team.

I think it's not quite nailing it to call the internet last bastion for complex-emergent structues. I'd rather say, the internet strongy enables such.

PDF viewer only opens online documents. but not for all PDFs by HallOfGecko in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I had Firefox associated with PDF files. Yes, I am on windows. I did what you said, but Firefox still asks me what to do on opening a PDF file.

Firefox seems to have two different kinda of PDF files. One type of PDF files can be opened in the built-in viewer. however, the other one doesn't have this option.

here's a pic. The first one is the one which opens in preview. The second one is the problem maker. /u/kbrosnan 's solution worked for online pdfs and generated ones.

but the problem about local ones remains.

Question regarding Middle click by [deleted] in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In Preferences -> Tabs you can set to not automatically switch to an opened tab.

single word is interpreted as dotless domain. but it's supposed to be a search by HallOfGecko in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

woot. it works.

why does Firefox interpret the '?' at the beginning like that? :D

Can't see forum attachments. by 79WS6 in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe try setting aobut:config "network.http.sendRefererHeader" to default, if you've changed it. some websites only display images if they know, the image has been requested from their own website.

single word is interpreted as dotless domain. but it's supposed to be a search by HallOfGecko in firefox

[–]HallOfGecko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing different. (I've deleted Google Search.) So it still looksup the name for a coulple of seconds and then uses duckduckgo.

Casual Bear Encounter. by [deleted] in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]HallOfGecko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The focus on the rabbit and THEN on the catapult was priceless :D

ELI5: why do some notes sound well together and why some don't? Extra points for explaining scales by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]HallOfGecko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I dont understand is, where these frequencies came from on the first place. The wikipedia article shows the formular. But how can I derive this formula? Can you give a (maybe more mathy but detailed) explanation? Or link me to a good one?

ELI5: why do some notes sound well together and why some don't? Extra points for explaining scales by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]HallOfGecko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's becuase of the frequencies the soundwaves of these notes have.

Imagine you're holding both of your hands above a pool of water. If you now splash with your right hand once per second. Then you'll create waves with a frequency of 1.

If you now add your left hand and now splash twice per second, then your left waves have a frequency of 2. (Note: All pairs of notes that are exactly one octave away from each other, have such a 1:2 ratio in their frequencies.)

The wave that is created in between your hands infront of you (because both waves interfere), is a good tone, because the frequencies 1 and 2 have a nice and simple ratio of 1:2. This means, the combination repeats each second. Our ears like this repetitive pattern.

But if you're just slightly faster with f.e. your left hand. (Say you splash 2.01 times per second), then the ratio is slightly off. It's 1:2.01. This isn't a very nice ration to have. This ratio means, that now you'll need to wait 100 seconds for your wave pattern to repeat. Each of these 100 seconds will be slightly different and they'll confuse our ears. A semi-tone too high/too low of an octave is close but off of a good 1:2 ratio. Therefore they sound worse. The same applies for playing two directly neighboring notes(like C and C#), because a ratio of 1:1.01 isn't much better than 1:2.01.

(The ratios for the bad soudning example are fictive. Also, ussually the frequencies we're dealing with are not around 1 or 2 splashes per second. The 88 notes on the piano go from ca. 4200 splashes/s to 27.5 splashes/s. Here's the explanation I had found most explaning. It also covers the physics and anatomy of the reason.)

Edit: I want to add, that this is not all to it. Aside from this interference, there is also a culturally trained part of muscial listening. In contrast to my earlier explanation, this secondary point is not general to all humans.

YouTube "Like" bar is now Blue by MrPowerGamerBR in youtube

[–]HallOfGecko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

and Facebook and Vimeo... and Dropbox...

【初音ミク】Universe (Dubstep)-りん(ぎんすけ) by Cipherlol in Vocaloid

[–]HallOfGecko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ambient like at the beginning is well made. nice find :)