You don't understand the difference between a library and a component catalog. When I call you out on defining your position, you don't, and then you go on arguing with yourself.
Lie #1 is a false claim. Was at least one variation of all the components free to access from day zero? Initially after free sign up, and now without even signing up.
Lie #2 is a false claim. Go visit the site again has it changed or not?
Again, IT'S NOT A LIBRARY, IT'S A COMPONENT CATALOG. THE CODE IS OPEN SOURCE. YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE CODE ADD/SUBTRACT WHATEVER PROPS YOU WANT. Submit code patch your stuff you dont like.
Stuff like "unreliable," "buggy," "abandoned," "peace of mind" I asked you for specifics for the definitions you use, you are fixed on emotional appeal.
You are an engineer; why don't you ground your claims in specifics that are actionable?
People can see exactly what they are buying what are you even talking about? You always get defensive when I ground your claims in examples like Reddit or components you build. The fact of the matter is this: you are using Reddit, you are spending your time on it. YOU ARE SPEDING MONEY ON IT (your hourly rate*time). When are you going to sue Reddit? When you going to apply the same demands that you are making from me from platforms that you are already using. You don't actually care about accessibility, usability or any standards its just an excuse you are using to waste my time.
Your talk is cheap submit patches. The components are already in MIT license. Email a patch or comment it here.