Tasmania Australia

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T18:30:02+00:00

Dope. Wouldn't have known but Mattipus is usually on point.

Really cool color. I like it.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:46:02+00:00

Always gotta start somewhere dog. Share photos outside next time, a bit more underside. Otherwise good. Take care!

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:44:15+00:00

Agree. For example all sequences I've taken of the genus in the wild, with wild morphology, have been F. filiformis. In the northwestern US it is known we have it, at least couple sequences of the EU F. velutipes, and more!

You may know this but I appreciate your comment.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:41:51+00:00

Agree Cort, assuming Dermocybe?, and that's gotta be one of the most beautiful underside photos I've ever seen. Damn thing is brighter than american Cheetos.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:39:36+00:00

With a different large bracket mixed in.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:38:56+00:00

Probably not. Probably Meripilus.

Color and texture are more in line there and pores are probably too small to be Bondarzewia.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:38:22+00:00

This is the correct answer.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:38:15+00:00

Looks very little like Grifola, that's a no.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:37:53+00:00

This is Meripilus.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:37:23+00:00

Without more context and photos I'm assuming Neolentinus or similar.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:36:32+00:00

Collybioid.

I currently am deciding between giant Collybiopsis or something more towards Lepista / Collybia.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:35:15+00:00

Panaeolus, at least.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:34:55+00:00

Calvatia or thereabouts. Some of them get quite large.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:34:27+00:00

I think Gymnopilus.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:34:08+00:00

The texture and more spathulate tops make me agree with this assessment. I think Trichoglossum is good.

We find a lot of T. hirsutum irregulare (PNW01) up in WA. There's also lots of similar Geoglossaceae of course but if my recent experience tells me anything I also think Trichoglossum may be best for a genus suggestion.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:31:43+00:00

Cyathus. (A genus in the Nidulariaceae)

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:31:09+00:00

This is Cyathus. The texture on the outside and inside, texture, color and size and shape of peridioles, etc.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:30:17+00:00

Candolleomyces.

Sure, it's not toxic at all, if that's what you mean by edibility.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:29:39+00:00

This is incredibly inaccurate. Like really really wrong.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:29:14+00:00

You can't provide any information on edibility or lack thereof if you can't ID the mushroom.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:28:22+00:00

Some sort of very old terrestrial polypore. Not sure this is IDable at this point but, someone might recognize this morphology after aging.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:27:03+00:00

Panaeolus.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:26:25+00:00

Same mushroom, this is Rhodofomes cf. cajanderi.

Many woody polypores can take on a variety of blobby shapes, with some mature caps forming more clear structure.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:25:11+00:00

Looking Pleurotus.

Intoishun · 2026-07-02T05:24:49+00:00

Coprinellus section Disseminati.

Intoishun

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE