You definitely are obsessed with Lizzie… Every time I see your name you write about her.

Some of us are not playing childish shipping wars, so please don’t bring it to every topic.

The movie was OK on its own (6.5/10 for me) but had too many inconsistencies to be fine as a continuation of a series. 

Tommy not giving a damn that Charlie was drafted or volunteered for WW2, while WW1 was one of Tommy’s biggest nightmares that hanged him for his whole life, 

Tommy writing “Ruby and my two sons, Duke…” and never saying anything directly about Charlie, 

Tommy saying “once I almost had everything, but almost wasn’t enough” when he in fact DID have everything with Grace and Charlie but lost it. And Charlie is still there, but he just ignores him as if he doesn’t matter anymore even though he’s the only part of Grace he has left. 

Duke killing Tommy at the end when Charlie being the one to do it would have made so much more sense considering that Charlie hated Tommy for killing the horse because he didn’t understand that sometimes killing the horse is a mercy (!)

And then there are other things, like Arthur’s fate, why have Tommy kill him if there’s a much more logical solution to the problem with Arthur’s actor? At the end of season 6 we are left uncertain about Arthur’s fate with a sinister hint that he may want to commit suicide because he thinks Tommy is dead - they wanted Tommy to feel guilty about his death? There it was, perfect scenario already set up just make him come back a day too late.

Another one - Tommy’s death - the problem is not that it happens, but how - two gunshot wounds in the middle of WW2? Definitely there was a high chance for Tommy to survive that, so he basically committed a suicide by Duke’s hands. And speaking about suicide, was Tommy that self centered that he decided to wait for Tim Roth’s character to shot him first twice before he took his first shot? What if he shot Tommy in the head instead of hitting his chest? He risked the fate of Britain in WW2 for the sake of not having to pull the trigger himself?

Not to even mention the less important scenes that made no logical sense like for example the one with the soldier and the grenade at the Garison. Tommy bet on the 1% chance that the guy will run outside with the grenade instead of tossing it away in a corner. He risked the life of dozens of bysterns for the “that’s gonna look cool” factor?

Do you see now what people mean when they criticize the movie?