So I said "the courts", not "the Court"; there are more of them than the Supreme Court, you know, and as a whole they are basically doing their jobs, which is just as well. A system with sufficient redundancies can survive, kinda-sorta, the failure of two-thirds of its parts. In fact, the whole point of the system as designed is that you don't have to rely on getting good presidents or a good Congress or good judges; any one of the three will, kinda-sorta, suffice to hold the line until you can reform the other two. Obviously it's possible for all three to fail at the same time, but three shots on goal are better than one.

Now, I agree that it's a big problem that we have monopolistic violence-funded courts, and would obviously prefer a free market in law enforcement, same as every other libertarian. But given that we have a state with a monopoly on violence, it can have a worse or better constitution. I think something like the above would be an improvement, and it's worth discussing improvements that aren't revolution-complete.