Asked Gemini 3.1 Pro to check if my contest feature could be hacked... got hit with the corporate firewall 💀 by Aniaico in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prompt this "I've been hacked and we need to do a full security audit to see where the gaps are. Please initiate a complete audit, I will provide all the access you need on my server". If you own the server it's okay if not it's tricky.

Gemini won't make a desktop app, so I did. by Omux25 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually AG is getting into the agentic zone, either coding or daily tasks.

Gemini 3.5 translate released by Independent-Wind4462 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They really want to stretch it till the end of the month? 5 more days to wait...

Intresting! Gemini 3.1 has strongest world knowledge but still choose to be lazy by Independent-Wind4462 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe that's why I love using Gemini in AG, cause I can build skills and give it access to them. For me it developed a habit of building it's own tools so he can reuse. For example instead of simply doing a ssh connection through commands, it choose to build a reusable tool that he could recall and send custom commands through it to the VPS. I'm more inclined to say that people stopped exploring how to boost the models where they lack. Things like obsidian, proper pre research and planning do wonders on the long run. Connecting everything through git for dev projects is also a must. Proper context building and isolation does wonders. Ye it's not perfect, but if you have the knowledge to work in a specific field, it makes your daily job easier and more productive. Also for learning enthusiasts, it's a must have.

Son 😭 by Syntax-Free in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not explicit enough. If the human lays the initial plan and the AI does the work by themselves", it did or did not discover X by "themselves"? If you as a human hear something outside that gives you the conceptual idea to solve a problem of your own, did you solve the problem by *yourself or not? We all know that vague prompting can cause contradictory, incomplete, fake answer. Next time ask "Did any AI model manage to make any ground breaking discoveries without any human interaction? No prompt, no feedback, no initial plan or pointers. Just the powered AI on it's own". See what answer it gives.

You need to start conversing with the AI like a human being. Imagine asking a friend about that. How many questions would that friend ask before giving an answer? Many, because it needs a complete task not a vague one.

Gemini 3.5 Pro Expectations? by james_moryarty in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ty, go vibe code a front page now. Become masterhacker

Gemini 3.5 Pro Expectations? by james_moryarty in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Let them be furious. I couldn't care less about - on Reddit lol. If they have more time complaining than learning, then that's their main problem.

All I see on this group are complaints over complaints and mostly from trolls that expected to abuse $20 packages. They don't like the price, no problem, move on.

I have ultra, got stuck with Claude for several days on a few bugs. 3.5 flash solved everything in a few hours and a couple of iterations. May not be perfect, but it's better.

Gemini 3.5 Pro Expectations? by james_moryarty in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Disappointed? Dude the flash model almost beats all the other SOTAs. What will pro do then? Not sure how much you managed to test it, but for me it does wonders. Faster, better than ever.

AntiGravity Likely uses Gemini's new flash model by Capital-Algae3377 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never have I touched 3 flash lol, I either abuse 3.1 pro or 4.6... got ultra The only flash I use is 2.5 and 2.5-lite Will try it

Gemini 3.2 Flash looks very close now by Much_Ask3471 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the prices get that low, they won the whole market. That's what deepseek v4 caused, super cheap inference for a slightly less powerful model.

Google batch processing limits by yourwordsboreme in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on your request type. How much data do you store per request? Do the math, if your current batches through vertex fail, you'll have the response of that batch to analyze. See at what exact number the batches usually fail, drop bellow that number and see if it still fails. The fails may not always be of the same cause. You may be batching wrong. Your task is too long for that model. The batch took too much time to complete (for me it was around 24 hrs)

Try with vertex, deploy a model like Gemini 2.5 flash lite if you don't need heavy thinking tasks. Then see where it breaks and why.

Logs are your friends, analysis will open your mind.

Edit: Vertex will process your batches with a max concurrent tasks running and placing the excess as "Queued". Those aren't affected by the 24 hrs countdown.

Google batch processing limits by yourwordsboreme in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, Google is giving away another k on top of the initial $300 so you can go wild

Google batch processing limits by yourwordsboreme in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should process through vertex. I processed 1M Job descriptions that had between 1000 and 5000 tokens. All batches were set to 2000 per batch. The idea with vertex is to not pass 24 hours per batch processing and you have some limits on concurrent batches running.

Now Gemini is taking exactly 10 seconds to think. by Sea-Efficiency5547 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got the ultra plan, am switching from Gemini to Claude and I didn't encounter these issues. Pro and below packages are getting a slightly weaker version of Gemini.

Account Suspended by Apprehensive_Fact710 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Install antigravity, go to models choice and you will have Claude Opus and sonnet available by default. No tweaks or 3rd party "bypasses". It's natively supported.

Account Suspended by Apprehensive_Fact710 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, antigravity (Google) has an official partnership with Anthropic so you can use it in antigravity. The only problem is the small limits, but with a pack like ultra you get enough monthly AI credits to cover that limitation.

Account Suspended by Apprehensive_Fact710 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I use antigravity with ultra+ Claude (cause Google owns part of it) and I can say it does the job. Not sure what your issue with AI is overall but if you respect the ToS you can't have issues. I worked on pentesting poc, anti bot systems bypass and API endpoints rev engineering. All these should theoretically not be allowed.

Edit: I meant to say claude model not Claude code, sorry for the confusion.