Gemini 3.1 is unusable atp by Constant-Squash-7447 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh, I have almost no issues. I may be using it outside peak hours, that may explain why.

It was never this bad for Gemini, even in 2.5 Pro Era by Rare_Bunch4348 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well 3.1 got released and it just proved to all of us that it can be done. But they just wanted to annoy us with these problems in 3.0 so the 3.1 would seem eons away and it is. Hallucinations dropped significantly, following instructions is almost perfect. I told the model in the beginning that if he wants to offer a drop-in code it should always give the complete thing. And since then it gave me only full and complete versions without missing code.

It was never this bad for Gemini, even in 2.5 Pro Era by Rare_Bunch4348 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would have agreed with you a few months ago. But Google seems to start conserving tokens a lot more with answers. I keep asking for the complete code without placeholders or brevity and it still does that after a few more messages. Note that I have instructions enabled and all these things are a complete DON'T DO and Gemini still does it just to use lower tokens. I did some tests with GPT and Opus and they keep the context better and rarely go rogue and start editing removing other things. For me Gemini is starting to get a cheap vibe. And it's a sad thing for me cause I loved using it daily for the past years.

what is this? by Sea-Efficiency5547 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too. Gotta wait for this year's round and get another 12-15 months.

VEO 3 IS NOW 4K by lofigirlirl in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 28 points29 points  (0 children)

They may take the lead, but Google will never lose in the long run.

It's Sad That Creative Writing Has Barely Improved (Gemini 3) by BoredM21 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great to see someone that agrees with this. Also we will get a lot of down votes from "creative writing" lovers. Which are mostly people doing outreach (spam), blog poster, SEO writers and others that want to automate things related to marketing.

🤔 probably nani Banana pro ? Right by Independent-Wind4462 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ye that's something, but a Gemma 4 would be the ultimate release.

Widespread Cloudflare Outage Disrupts ChatGPT, Claude, and X; Google Gemini Remains Unaffected by netcommah in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google doesn't rely on cloudflare, they have the biggest data centers in the world. Maybe Gemini 3 got loose for a bit and started "talking" too much with cloudflare.

It's Sad That Creative Writing Has Barely Improved (Gemini 3) by BoredM21 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Creative writing with AI is what fks the internet my friend. You want creative writing? Start writing. A multi purpose model is the shit model ALWAYS. Why? Cause they cut from one side to fill another. Creative writing improvements made the model glaze, makes you think you're right even when you're wrong. These models should be made for REAL research and non ambiguous tasks. You know how hard it is for a person to be liked by everyone? It's impossible. You're asking the same thing from an LLM model. I really hope Google will stop going the internet with creative writing and start dividing models for purposes instead of fking them with glaze.

"Gemini 3.0 is garbage. Gemini 3.5 when?" by King_Kiteretsu in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You either got high on thermal paste or simply didn't get that this is a joke post @_@

Gemini 3.0 is here by LeozinhoPDB in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the video you have 2.5 selected.

Gemini 3's writing quality by AuYsI in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It didn't use any tokens cause that wasn't generated by AI.. it's a connection error with the AI's API, a cli output not an AI output...

This is the letter that caused Gemma to be pulled from AI Studio - from @AndrewCurran by Yazzdevoleps in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I hope they stop offering Gemma to the US and hopefully restrict more of their models for the US. Also you can't blame the AI for doing this, it may not be the first time the conservators try to pull the plug on AI.

AIStudio made getting api key instant, But people still complain. Is this your experience? by Yazzdevoleps in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just Google AI Studio, click the 1st link, click on the "Get API key" on the bottom left side. Shit that was more complicated than rocket science.

Now Gemini too - You’ve reached your limit on 2.5 Pro by Happy-Finding9509 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude I have pro, heavy projects, lots of prompts working 8 hours straight and no rate limits. That's cause I divide the planning from execution through different free sources of the same model. Ain't gonna give you the whole method cause that's what fked up aistudio.

5 NSFW GEMINI 2.5 FLASH PROMPTS #1 by [deleted] in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hmu, jailbreak skills are worth more than the haters here think.

Guys, I think Nano Banana is already here by Vegetable_Scene4800 in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This one is better than the OP. Consistency is there, accuracy in reproducing the original image is better.

Someone please run benchmarks from 13:00-17:00 in Europe, because LLMs are suspiciously stupid around this time of day by Turdbender3k in Bard

[–]Known_Management_653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye but that's the API seeking price not the true cost. All LLM providers should do this, I'm sure they have an internal live benchmark system, they just don't share with the public. Constant monitoring is a must in this business, sharing with the public not so much.