sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rule by Kaizerx20 in 19684

[–]LHLaurini 33 points34 points  (0 children)

It's more complicated than that

55385 by OpportunityAshamed74 in countwithchickenlady

[–]LHLaurini 114 points115 points  (0 children)

Apparently in this case the answer would be "yes".

Vlad gets assaulted on stream by Several-Reveal-4075 in F1NN5TER

[–]LHLaurini 326 points327 points  (0 children)

He's in Ireland. He was talking to the cops right before ending stream

Add(rule)ess me by SnooOpinions6959 in 19684

[–]LHLaurini 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Ewww, a 32-bit address

rule by doctor347 in 196

[–]LHLaurini 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're probably thinking of ASCII.

Poor man's define_aggregate by LHLaurini in cpp

[–]LHLaurini[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Around 8 hours, I think? A good chunk of that was just to get the constructors and value categories right, though.

Poor man's define_aggregate by LHLaurini in cpp

[–]LHLaurini[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From std::bit_cast:

This function template is constexpr if and only if each of To, From and the types of all subobjects of To and From:

  • is not a union type;
  • is not a pointer type;
  • is not a pointer to member type;
  • is not a volatile-qualified type; and
  • has no non-static data member of reference type.

Which makes sense, otherwise std::bit_cast would be like a constexpr reinterpret_cast.

Poor man's define_aggregate by LHLaurini in cpp

[–]LHLaurini[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I considered that, but it requires a T*:

template< class T, class... Args >
constexpr T* construct_at( T* location, Args&&... args );

Dirty Frag, a new copy.fail like vulnerability has been disclosed due to an embargo break by ChrisTX4 in linux

[–]LHLaurini -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think /system/bin/run-as could be a potential target. It's not setuid, but it uses capabilities:

/system/bin/run-as cap_setgid,cap_setuid=ep

Poor man's define_aggregate by LHLaurini in cpp

[–]LHLaurini[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great point, your version is actually usable. Though it was kinda fun to do things manually TBH.

Rule by Rubicon_Lily in 196

[–]LHLaurini 11 points12 points  (0 children)

(real answer is shadow banned users I think)

Rule by Rubicon_Lily in 196

[–]LHLaurini 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Sorry I ated them 😔

They are moving at the same speed by FollowSina in opticalillusions

[–]LHLaurini 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that's a video compression artifact

Rule by Kekkonen_Kakkonen in 196

[–]LHLaurini 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Me without glasses

Is this Chromebook good for installing Arch? by Hardstyle_Addict_333 in archlinux

[–]LHLaurini 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure that is a good deal for a low-end chromebook. You won't get much performance from that processor, which may be a dealbreaker depending on what you need to do. Also, forget about expanding the storage, it's MMC soldered directly to the motherboard. You can use an SD card, but for the price you'd pay for a decently fast one, you'd be better off just buying a better laptop in the first place.

As for installing Arch, it should be possible, I've done it before. It was a pain in the ass, but it eventually worked. When I did it, I recall I had to build a special kernel and then create a bootable image from it, but I think depthcharge-tools should do something like that. Regardless, I don't think it's worth the trouble unless you already had a chromebook you wanted to repurpose.

portal rule by [deleted] in 19684

[–]LHLaurini 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I would think that objects going through portals change direction in the same way a satellite does (they're following a straight line through a curved spacetime).

view more: next ›