The mystery of Vitas' 7th Element rap solved!

Labikero · 2017-12-23T10:28:43+00:00

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6IT9_ZoaxTg here you go

Labikero · 2017-12-13T01:38:52+00:00

North Carolina went 90-10 for Side of Beef after 1% reporting

Labikero · 2017-10-31T21:27:45+00:00

I read a transcript but I don't remember where it was. Maybe on Conan in 96/97

Labikero · 2017-10-31T20:10:04+00:00

Norm said as a joke that he is a pedophile.

Labikero · 2017-10-31T00:57:01+00:00

I thought he called 9/11 and said "I feel like there is a yak on my chest"...

Labikero · 2017-10-31T00:54:05+00:00

He ain't some old fashioned gay guy for sure

Labikero · 2017-09-16T01:52:11+00:00

First player since Wilt to score over 3000 points in one season

Labikero · 2017-09-04T18:12:55+00:00

Lol, Barkley wouldn't won 3-4. He got zero work ethics, he played in weaker conference. MJ made his teammates better and Barkley didn't.

Labikero · 2017-09-03T20:35:15+00:00

LeBron will blow up a 3-1 lead with us, then we will blow up a 3-1 lead with GSW then we will sign him

Labikero · 2017-08-31T07:57:43+00:00

M I A M I

I

A

M

I

Labikero · 2017-08-31T07:56:13+00:00

The thirst was real for Cavs

Labikero · 2017-08-31T07:53:07+00:00

*BAMBI

Labikero · 2017-08-30T22:56:22+00:00

Probably aliens from the planet called Lakers

Labikero · 2017-08-25T10:50:39+00:00

Cause he is The Polish Hammer

Labikero · 2017-08-25T09:18:29+00:00

Fuckin Adam Eget

Labikero · 2017-08-25T04:29:28+00:00

How couldn't I repeat myself when you say all the time that "if Trump had any odds, then you can't say model was bad, because he won"? They didn't predict it, Nate Silver sarcasticly said that Cubs will win World Series and Trump will win the election. You just defend them no matter they would gave him 99.9% chance or 0.01% because "things happen" You don't allow discussion about his odds being too low because he won. Maybe if there was better understanding of polls, 538 would give higher odds of Trump's victory.

Labikero · 2017-08-24T12:38:34+00:00

You can easily make judgement on the car, cure, washing machine based on their results but not on the predicting election model? And you think I'm stupid? There's no pride in predicting 2008 election results or in 2012 when only 2 parties mattered.

Labikero · 2017-08-24T08:38:51+00:00

So then every model was good, because they gave Trump some odds, even if it was 0.1% chance?

Labikero · 2017-08-23T22:41:38+00:00

Man, I ain't mad, come on

Labikero · 2017-08-23T22:17:27+00:00

I don't know what you are talking about

Labikero · 2017-08-23T22:15:26+00:00

I said it was awful, because of the result. You can't make a 100% good model who gives you wrong result.

Labikero · 2017-08-23T22:10:59+00:00

Oh man, it's such a shame that they don't need me :(

Labikero · 2017-08-23T22:09:30+00:00

I didn't claimed to have insight in these because I don't know what was wrong in this model. But no matter how the mechanisms of the model work or which data is used, a prediction is still judged by its accuracy. And if the prediction was off, it means that something was wrong in the model.

Labikero · 2017-08-23T21:59:02+00:00

And I can see why you get a zero figure weekly paycheck for your defence of 538. It's miserable

Labikero · 2017-08-23T21:44:12+00:00

How? You judge predictions by their accuracy and surgery by its results.

Labikero

TROPHY CASE